nattelyst.dk Nattelyst.dk

   
Nattelyst | Bedre nattesøvn → mere hverdagsenergi

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Nattelyst.dk?

1.26E-5% of global Internet users visit Nattelyst.dk

How many people visit Nattelyst.dk each day?

• Nattelyst.dk receives approximately 619 visitors and 3,311 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Nattelyst.dk receive most of its visitors from?

• Nattelyst.dk is mostly visited by people located in Denmark.

How much Nattelyst.dk can earn?

• Nattelyst.dk should earn about $4.97/day from advertising revenue.

What is Nattelyst.dk estimated value?

• Estimated value of Nattelyst.dk is $4,857.34.

What IP addresses does Nattelyst.dk resolve to?

• Nattelyst.dk resolves to the IP addresses 93.191.156.160.

Where are Nattelyst.dk servers located in?

• Nattelyst.dk has servers located in Denmark.

nattelyst.dk Profile

Title:Nattelyst | Bedre nattesøvn → mere hverdagsenergi Description:Hos Nattelyst hjælper vi dig med, at optimere din nattesøvn ⭐. Døjer du med dårlig søvn eller generelle søvnproblemer, så se vores hjemmeside.
Category:Sports / Other Sports

What technologies does nattelyst.dk use?

These are the technologies used at nattelyst.dk. nattelyst.dk has a total of 23 technologies installed in 18 different categories.

nattelyst.dk Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 619 visitors daily, generating a total of 3.3K pageviews. This equates to about 18.8K monthly visitors. Nattelyst.dk traffic has increased by 156.87% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors619
17.31%
Monthly Visits18.8K
156.87%
Pages per Visit5.34
40.05%
Visit duration02:28
777.68%
Bounce Rate49.23%
215.8%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
619
Monthly Visits:
18,756
Pages per Visit:
5.34
Daily Pageviews:
3,311
Avg. visit duration:
02:28
Bounce rate:
49.23%
Global Reach:
1.26E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
46,105
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
13,488
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
18,770
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
10,405,996
SimilarWeb Rank:
970,119
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
71.40%
Referral:
1.36%
Search:
5.33%
Social:
0%
Paid:
21.91%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
16.26%
Mobile:
83.74%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

41.2K
MAY
7.3K
JUN
18.8K
JUL

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Denmark 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to nattelyst.dk?

Websites similar to nattelyst.dk are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 30 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with nattelyst.dk in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  nattelyst.dk
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  10,405,996
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  26
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  3
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $5.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $5 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $149.1 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.8K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $4.9K.

How much would nattelyst.dk make?

Daily Revenue:
$4.97
Monthly Revenue:
$149.10
Yearly Revenue:
$1,814.05
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Denmark 3,311$4.97

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$1.24
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$37.25
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$453.19
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
828
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
24,833
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
302,129

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Denmark 828$1.24

How much is nattelyst.dk worth?

Website Value:
$4.9K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
nattelyst.dk
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
nattelyst.dk
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
nattelyst.dk
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is nattelyst.dk hosted?

Nattelyst.dk may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
93.191.156.160
ASN:
AS48854 
ISP:
Zitcom A/S 
Server Location:

Denmark, DK
 

Other sites hosted on 93.191.156.160

How fast does nattelyst.dk load?

The average loading time of nattelyst.dk is 141 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
141 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 93% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.6s 46% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 46% 34% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 34% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 65% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 65% 26% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 26% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)70ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 78% 15% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 15% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)3ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 88% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.7s 51% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 51% 26% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 26% 22% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 22%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 62% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 62% 29% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 29% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)62ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.7s 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 70% 20% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 20% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 1.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
INP breakdown  
Start investigating with the longest subpart. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 0.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Largest Contentful Paint 1.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.6s 46% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 43% 39% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 39% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 17%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.2s 65% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 58% 32% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 32% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)117ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.6s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 70% 25% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 25% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.9s 40% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 40% 30% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 30% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.4s 45% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 45% 44% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 44% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)145ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 86% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 12% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.4s 52% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 52% 33% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 33% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13%

Lab Data

Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 1.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 1.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP breakdown  
Start investigating with the longest subpart. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 1.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Does nattelyst.dk use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on nattelyst.dk are reduced by 84%.
nattelyst.dk use gzip compression.
Original size: 766 KB
Compressed size: 119.53 KB
File reduced by: 646.47 KB (84%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. nattelyst.dk has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. nattelyst.dk supports HTTPS.
 nattelyst.dk supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: nattelyst.dk
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R13
Valid from: Sep 1 06:09:20 2025 GMT
Valid until: Nov 30 06:09:19 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R13
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 nattelyst.dk supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 13:03:03 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
content-length: 122398
server: Apache
content-encoding: gzip
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, max-age=0
pragma: no-cache
expires: Wed, 11 Jan 1984 05:00:00 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
etag: "70800f086ea6b31fe446e17ad582c8c7"
last-modified: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 11:08:55 GMT
x-content-type-options: nosniff
simplycom-server: Apache
simplycom-server: nginx
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400, h3-29=":443"

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 93.191.156.160 2655