kontaktbar.ru Kontaktbar.ru

   
Сеть молодёжных баров – КОНТАКТ БАР

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Kontaktbar.ru?

3.84E-5% of global Internet users visit Kontaktbar.ru

How many people visit Kontaktbar.ru each day?

• Kontaktbar.ru receives approximately 1.9K visitors and 5,110 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Kontaktbar.ru receive most of its visitors from?

• Kontaktbar.ru is mostly visited by people located in Russian Federation.

How much Kontaktbar.ru can earn?

• Kontaktbar.ru should earn about $2.09/day from advertising revenue.

What is Kontaktbar.ru estimated value?

• Estimated value of Kontaktbar.ru is $2,040.24.

What IP addresses does Kontaktbar.ru resolve to?

• Kontaktbar.ru resolves to the IP addresses 77.222.57.72.

Where are Kontaktbar.ru servers located in?

• Kontaktbar.ru has servers located in Russia.

kontaktbar.ru Profile

Title:Сеть молодёжных баров – КОНТАКТ БАР
Description:КОНТАКТ БАР - БАР ДРУЗЕЙ с убойными коктейлями, бомбической едой, демократичными ценами, бесконечным количеством акций и скидок для каждого!
Tags:
Category:Arts and Entertainment / Other Arts and Entertainment

What technologies does kontaktbar.ru use?

These are the technologies used at kontaktbar.ru. kontaktbar.ru has a total of 5 technologies installed in 7 different categories.

kontaktbar.ru Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 1.9K visitors daily, generating a total of 5.1K pageviews. This equates to about 57.4K monthly visitors. Kontaktbar.ru traffic has decreased by 70.04% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1.9K
57.08%
Monthly Visits57.4K
70.04%
Pages per Visit2.70
34.96%
Visit duration03:51
56.58%
Bounce Rate43.25%
37.25%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,893
Monthly Visits:
57,358
Pages per Visit:
2.70
Daily Pageviews:
5,110
Avg. visit duration:
03:51
Bounce rate:
43.25%
Global Reach:
3.84E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
35,089
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
31,214
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
57,960
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
13,744,631
SimilarWeb Rank:
613,405
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
85.71%
Referral:
1.56%
Search:
12.72%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
18.87%
Mobile:
81.13%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

59.7K
JAN
191.4K
FEB
57.4K
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Russian Federation 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to kontaktbar.ru?

Websites similar to kontaktbar.ru are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 1 day ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with kontaktbar.ru in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
128

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  kontaktbar.ru
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  13,744,631
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  29
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $2.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $62.7 and annual gross revenue of approximately $762.9. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $2K.

How much would kontaktbar.ru make?

Daily Revenue:
$2.09
Monthly Revenue:
$62.70
Yearly Revenue:
$762.85
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Russian Federation 5,110$2.10

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.13
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$3.77
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$45.88
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
307
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
9,198
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
111,909

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Russian Federation 307$0.13

How much is kontaktbar.ru worth?

Website Value:
$2K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
kontaktbar.ru
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
kontaktbar.ru
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
kontaktbar.ru
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is kontaktbar.ru hosted?

Kontaktbar.ru may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
77.222.57.72
ASN:
AS44112 
ISP:
SpaceWeb Ltd 
Server Location:

Russia, RU
 

Other sites hosted on 77.222.57.72

How fast does kontaktbar.ru load?

The average loading time of kontaktbar.ru is 528 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 98.
Average Load Time:
528 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)16ms 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 53% 40% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 40% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)322ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)749ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)43ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)779ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)11ms 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 67% 26% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 26% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)313ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)705ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)53ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)792ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 0.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 1.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)508ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)970ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 91% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)345ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4% 91% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 91% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.1s 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)566ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)353ms 5% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 90% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 90% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 91% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint 1.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 3.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 1.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 3.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric

Does kontaktbar.ru use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on kontaktbar.ru are reduced by 52%.
kontaktbar.ru use gzip compression.
Original size: 4.59 KB
Compressed size: 2.16 KB
File reduced by: 2.43 KB (52%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. kontaktbar.ru supports HTTPS.
 kontaktbar.ru supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: kontaktbar.ru
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Jan 27 14:25:49 2025 GMT
Valid until: Apr 27 14:25:48 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 kontaktbar.ru supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
server: nginx/1.27.4
date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 06:25:23 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-powered-by: PHP/5.3.29-pl0-gentoo
p3p: policyref="/bitrix/p3p.xml", CP="NON DSP COR CUR ADM DEV PSA PSD OUR UNR BUS UNI COM NAV INT DEM STA"
x-powered-cms: Bitrix Site Manager (d000e505f42e0cb153bb58bdcc587f64)
set-cookie: PHPSESSID=oik8mdet3s5u2cdkcfjk7ehl96; path=/; HttpOnly
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
pragma: no-cache
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
content-encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
MX mail.kontaktbar.ru 600
SOA 600
Mname ns1.spaceweb.ru
Rname dns1.sweb.ru
Serial Number 2014110707
Refresh 28800
Retry 7200
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 600
TXT _amazonses.kontaktbar.ru,TXT,gV6LXNtZ8Nr/Cr7pyyIOYZ7uEINfbekbePWCHFA86ZE= 600
TXT _globalsign-domain-verification=d-VHqrsi9cCB3nUOX-RJi8zJcTei7AIdYsT3WHeJJH 600
TXT 6zvk4h2he3achigrswjcqv5typuup4sh._domainkey.kontaktbar.ru,CNAME,6zvk4h2he3achigrswjcqv5typuup4sh.dkim.amazonses.com 600
TXT 202107230418050n3ko97jr3bib4kjk9x174fs8pt38fhu2sgz8p6lu4u52xr1be 600
TXT 201908051048073mt2dur62h7din8ufnu6lmt668ewt6pt3j7u2ak8hsnk5701u6 600
TXT 202007210734022icrq1y9osk00y9knqiflfn183npp0ebg2rjoma76uc5k2em76 600
TXT 201808100911175hj3ghnl9e9r8c9nxyezdcdg1hs0s0e92ez5nus8dmwkgd5mn6 600
TXT v=spf1 ip4:91.230.211.111 600
TXT _globalsign-domain-verification=uLEBjU1wVbhgzUjkczVSP8exIxC2XR3HaTn01P74Qd 600
TXT s2igxj2ic4her5mhtw3qnthy32geqneu._domainkey.kontaktbar.ru,CNAME,s2igxj2ic4her5mhtw3qnthy32geqneu.dkim.amazonses.com 600
TXT lp3vrk7igcwbzc2scj744lu7c3iv6km4._domainkey.kontaktbar.ru,CNAME,lp3vrk7igcwbzc2scj744lu7c3iv6km4.dkim.amazonses.com 600
A 77.222.57.72 540
NS ns3.spaceweb.pro 600
NS ns1.spaceweb.ru 600
NS ns2.spaceweb.ru 600
NS ns4.spaceweb.pro 600

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on December 6, 2021 and will expire on December 6, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar R01-RU. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on April 16, 2025.
Domain Created:
2021-12-06
Domain Expires:
2025-12-06
Domain Age:
3 years 4 months 10 days
Domain Registrar:
R01-RU
WhoIs:
 

% TCI Whois Service. Terms of use:
% https://tcinet.ru/documents/whois_ru_rf.pdf (in Russian)
% https://tcinet.ru/documents/whois_su.pdf (in Russian)

domain:        KONTAKTBAR.RU
nserver:       ns1.spaceweb.ru.
nserver:       ns2.spaceweb.ru.
nserver:       ns3.spaceweb.pro.
nserver:       ns4.spaceweb.pro.
state:         REGISTERED, DELEGATED, VERIFIED
person:        Private Person
registrar:     R01-RU
admin-contact: https://partner.r01.ru/contact_admin.khtml
created:       2021-12-06T07:47:37Z
paid-till:     2025-12-06T07:47:37Z
free-date:     2026-01-06
source:        TCI

Last updated on 2025-04-15T06:23:01Z