fenamef.asso.fr Fenamef.asso.fr

   
Accueil - Fenamef

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Fenamef.asso.fr?

• Fenamef.asso.fr ranks #8,397,460 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Fenamef.asso.fr?

• 1.0E-6% of global Internet users visit Fenamef.asso.fr

How many people visit Fenamef.asso.fr each day?

• Fenamef.asso.fr receives approximately 50 visitors and 124 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Fenamef.asso.fr receive most of its visitors from?

• Fenamef.asso.fr is mostly visited by people located in France.

How much Fenamef.asso.fr can earn?

• Fenamef.asso.fr should earn about $0.07/day from advertising revenue.

What is Fenamef.asso.fr estimated value?

• Estimated value of Fenamef.asso.fr is $66.61.

What IP addresses does Fenamef.asso.fr resolve to?

• Fenamef.asso.fr resolves to the IP addresses 109.234.164.58.

Where are Fenamef.asso.fr servers located in?

• Fenamef.asso.fr has servers located in France.

fenamef.asso.fr Profile

Title:Accueil - Fenamef Description:La FENAMEF promeut la Médiation Familiale et les Espaces Familiaux, et soutient, en les fédérant, les professionnels.
Edit Site Info

What technologies does fenamef.asso.fr use?

These are the technologies used at fenamef.asso.fr. fenamef.asso.fr has a total of 15 technologies installed in 15 different categories.
WordPress plugins
Autoptimize Autoptimize
WP Rocket WP Rocket
WooCommerce WooCommerce
wpBakery wpBakery
Performance
Autoptimize Autoptimize
Priority Hints Priority Hints
Tag Managers
Google Tag Manager Google Tag Manager
Security
HSTS HSTS
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
jQuery Migrate jQuery Migrate
CDN
jsDelivr jsDelivr
Maps
Leaflet Leaflet
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
Caching
WP Rocket WP Rocket
Ecommerce
WooCommerce WooCommerce
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Page builders
wpBakery wpBakery
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Databases
MySQL MySQL

fenamef.asso.fr Traffic Analysis

Fenamef.asso.fr is ranked #8,397,460 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 50 visitors daily, generating a total of 124 pageviews. This equates to about 1.5K monthly visitors. Fenamef.asso.fr traffic has decreased by 78.46% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors50
89.53%
Monthly Visits1.5K
78.46%
Pages per Visit2.48
56.03%
Visit duration03:03
191.94%
Bounce Rate32.07%
25.18%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
50
Monthly Visits:
1,515
Pages per Visit:
2.48
Daily Pageviews:
124
Avg. visit duration:
03:03
Bounce rate:
32.07%
Global Reach:
1.0E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
1,451
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
705
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
1,467
HypeRank:
8,397,460
SEMrush Rank:
17,744,727
SimilarWeb Rank:
8,397,460
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
36.94%
Referral:
14.47%
Search:
34.11%
Social:
14.47%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

1.2K
AUG
7K
SEP
1.5K
OCT

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
France 100.00%
Last update was 10 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 14 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with fenamef.asso.fr in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  fenamef.asso.fr
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  17,744,727
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  8
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $2.1 and annual gross revenue of approximately $25.6. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $66.6.

How much would fenamef.asso.fr make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.07
Monthly Revenue:
$2.10
Yearly Revenue:
$25.55
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
France 124$0.07

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.01
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$0.24
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$2.89
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
14
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
409
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
4,979

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
France 14$0.01

How much is fenamef.asso.fr worth?

Website Value:
$66.6

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
fenamef.asso.fr
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
fenamef.asso.fr
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
fenamef.asso.fr
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is fenamef.asso.fr hosted? ▼

Fenamef.asso.fr may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
109.234.164.58
ASN:
AS50474 
ISP:
o2switch SARL 
Server Location:

France, FR
 

Other sites hosted on 109.234.164.58

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does fenamef.asso.fr load? ▼

The average loading time of fenamef.asso.fr is 705 ms. The Desktop speed index is 85 and mobile speed index is 59.
Average Load Time:
705 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

85
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)20ms 34% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 34% 52% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 52% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 12%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.7s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 58% 22% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 22% 18% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 18%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)34ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)20ms 34% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 34% 52% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 52% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 12%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.7s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 58% 22% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 22% 18% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 18%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)34ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Max Potential First Input Delay 80 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 2.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
LCP request discovery  
by making the LCP image discoverable from the HTML immediately, and avoiding lazy-loading Optimize LCP
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Speed Index 2.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Contentful Paint 1.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP breakdown  
Start investigating by looking at the longest subpart. how to improve INP

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

59
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)18ms 34% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 37% 45% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 45% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.9s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 62% 10% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 27% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 72% 22% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)89ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 82% 14% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)18ms 37% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 37% 45% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 45% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.9s 62% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 62% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 27% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 72% 22% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)89ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 82% 14% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 80 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 10.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 7.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 100 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 6.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
by making the LCP image discoverable from the HTML immediately, and avoiding lazy-loading Optimize LCP
Speed Index 6.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP breakdown  
Start investigating by looking at the longest subpart. how to improve INP

Does fenamef.asso.fr use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on fenamef.asso.fr are reduced by 60%.
fenamef.asso.fr use br compression.
Original size: 630.09 KB
Compressed size: 245.87 KB
File reduced by: 384.22 KB (60%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. fenamef.asso.fr has 61 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  61
Safety Confidence:
  3

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. fenamef.asso.fr supports HTTPS.
 fenamef.asso.fr supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: fenamef.asso.fr
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R13
Valid from: Oct 31 13:14:12 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jan 29 13:14:11 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R13
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 fenamef.asso.fr supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Sun, 07 Dec 2025 13:31:12 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
content-length: 0
location: https://www.fenamef.asso.fr/
x-redirect-by: WordPress
cache-control: max-age=3600, public
expires: Sun, 07 Dec 2025 13:31:12 GMT
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-content-type-options: nosniff
referrer-policy: no-referrer
server: o2switch-PowerBoost-v3

HTTP/2 200 
date: Sun, 07 Dec 2025 13:31:12 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
vary: Accept-Encoding
last-modified: Sun, 07 Dec 2025 10:17:08 GMT
cache-control: max-age=3600, public
expires: Sun, 07 Dec 2025 13:31:12 GMT
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-content-type-options: nosniff
referrer-policy: no-referrer
server: o2switch-PowerBoost-v3
content-encoding: br