diomeda.ru Diomeda.ru

   
Поздравительные открытки 2025

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Diomeda.ru?

• Diomeda.ru ranks #4,299,425 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Diomeda.ru?

• 2.04E-5% of global Internet users visit Diomeda.ru

How many people visit Diomeda.ru each day?

• Diomeda.ru receives approximately 1K visitors and 1,938 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Diomeda.ru receive most of its visitors from?

• Diomeda.ru is mostly visited by people located in Russian Federation,Belarus,Germany.

How much Diomeda.ru can earn?

• Diomeda.ru should earn about $2.05/day from advertising revenue.

What is Diomeda.ru estimated value?

• Estimated value of Diomeda.ru is $1,924.02.

What IP addresses does Diomeda.ru resolve to?

• Diomeda.ru resolves to the IP addresses 195.201.9.113.

Where are Diomeda.ru servers located in?

• Diomeda.ru has servers located in Gunzenhausen, Bavaria, 91710, Germany.

diomeda.ru Profile

Title:Поздравительные открытки 2025 Description:Поздравительные открытки на все случаи жизни
Edit Site Info

What technologies does diomeda.ru use?

These are the technologies used at diomeda.ru. diomeda.ru has a total of 5 technologies installed in 6 different categories.
UI frameworks
Bootstrap Bootstrap
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
Miscellaneous
PWA PWA
Operating Systems
Ubuntu Ubuntu

diomeda.ru Traffic Analysis

Diomeda.ru is ranked #4,299,425 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 1K visitors daily, generating a total of 1.9K pageviews. This equates to about 30.4K monthly visitors. Diomeda.ru traffic has decreased by 85.22% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1K
80.62%
Monthly Visits30.4K
85.22%
Pages per Visit1.93
92.88%
Visit duration01:04
93.76%
Bounce Rate44.57%
99.17%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,003
Monthly Visits:
30,391
Pages per Visit:
1.93
Daily Pageviews:
1,938
Avg. visit duration:
01:04
Bounce rate:
44.57%
Global Reach:
2.04E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
19,178
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
19,178
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
29,508
HypeRank:
4,299,425
SEMrush Rank:
14,599,385
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,011,197
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
99.34%
Referral:
0%
Search:
0.66%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
0.66%
Mobile:
99.34%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

125.7K
DEC
205.6K
JAN
30.4K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Russian Federation 45.53%
 
Belarus 23.04%
 
Germany 11.41%
 
Ukraine 7.48%
 
United States 5.34%
Last update was 285 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with diomeda.ru in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
10,200

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  diomeda.ru
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  14,599,385
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  17
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $2.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $61.5 and annual gross revenue of approximately $748.3. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1.9K.

How much would diomeda.ru make?

Daily Revenue:
$2.05
Monthly Revenue:
$61.50
Yearly Revenue:
$748.25
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 104$0.50
 
Russian Federation 882$0.36
 
Germany 221$0.31
 
Belarus 447$0.24
 
Ukraine 145$0.07

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.23
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$7.03
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$85.53
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
199
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
5,977
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
72,717

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 19$0.09
 
Germany 64$0.09
 
Belarus 45$0.02
 
Russian Federation 53$0.02
 
Ukraine 19$0.01

How much is diomeda.ru worth?

Website Value:
$1.9K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
diomeda.ru
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
diomeda.ru
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
diomeda.ru
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is diomeda.ru hosted? ▼

Diomeda.ru may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
195.201.9.113
ASN:
AS24940 
ISP:
Hetzner Online GmbH 
Server Location:
Gunzenhausen
Bavaria, BY
91710
Germany, DE
 

Other sites hosted on 195.201.9.113

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does diomeda.ru load? ▼

The average loading time of diomeda.ru is 340 ms. The Desktop speed index is 96 and mobile speed index is 87.
Average Load Time:
340 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

96
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 1.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 80 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 30 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 1.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

87
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)26ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 56% 17% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 17% 26% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 26%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)538ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 88% 8% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 86% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)148ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 85% 10% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 10% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)26ms 56% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 56% 17% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 17% 26% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 26%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)538ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 88% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 86% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)148ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 85% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 10% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Speed Index 4.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint 2.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 3.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 2.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements

Does diomeda.ru use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on diomeda.ru are reduced by 85%.
diomeda.ru use gzip compression.
Original size: 68.72 KB
Compressed size: 9.85 KB
File reduced by: 58.88 KB (85%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  UNKNOWN

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. diomeda.ru supports HTTPS.
 diomeda.ru supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: diomeda.ru
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Jan 10 12:21:10 2025 GMT
Valid until: Apr 10 12:21:09 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 diomeda.ru does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
Server: nginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu)
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 13:19:02 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Connection: keep-alive
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Set-Cookie: fusionCqreD_visited=yes; expires=Mon, 16-Mar-2026 13:19:02 GMT; Max-Age=31536000; path=/
Set-Cookie: fusionCqreD_lastvisit=1742127542; expires=Sun, 16-Mar-2025 14:19:02 GMT; Max-Age=3600; path=/; domain=diomeda.ru; httponly
Content-Encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT yandex-verification: 340a5098913cc438 60
TXT google-site-verification=lRJcLGd6a_Z-H_prvoIVh0vQQmCdZrJM0s7zLHOuo0w 60
MX mail.diomeda.ru 3600
SOA 3600
Mname billmgr.datahata.by
Rname support.datahata.by
Serial Number 2025011009
Refresh 10800
Retry 3600
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 86400
A 195.201.9.113 60
NS ns5.datahata.by 3600
NS ns6.datahata.by 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on December 23, 2022 and will expire on December 23, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar REGRU-RU. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on December 26, 2025.
Domain Created:
2022-12-23
Domain Expires:
2025-12-23
Domain Age:
3 years 3 days
Domain Registrar:
REGRU-RU
WhoIs:
 

% TCI Whois Service. Terms of use:
% https://tcinet.ru/documents/whois_ru_rf.pdf (in Russian)
% https://tcinet.ru/documents/whois_su.pdf (in Russian)

domain:        DIOMEDA.RU
nserver:       ns5.datahata.by.
nserver:       ns6.datahata.by.
state:         REGISTERED, DELEGATED, UNVERIFIED
person:        Private Person
registrar:     REGRU-RU
admin-contact: http://www.reg.ru/whois/admin_contact
created:       2022-12-23T07:25:48Z
paid-till:     2025-12-23T07:25:48Z
free-date:     2026-01-23
source:        TCI

Last updated on 2025-03-16T13:18:01Z