Yurasko.net
Yurasko.net – William F. Yurasko's web site
Domain Summary
What is the traffic rank for Yurasko.net?
• Yurasko.net ranks #6,209,162 globally on HypeStat.
What percent of global Internet users visit Yurasko.net?
• 1.5E-6% of global Internet users visit Yurasko.net
How many people visit Yurasko.net each day?
• Yurasko.net receives approximately 74 visitors and 145 page impressions per day.
Which countries does Yurasko.net receive most of its visitors from?
• Yurasko.net is mostly visited by people located in United States.
How much Yurasko.net can earn?
• Yurasko.net should earn about $0.70/day from advertising revenue.
What is Yurasko.net estimated value?
• Estimated value of Yurasko.net is $787.74.
What IP addresses does Yurasko.net resolve to?
• Yurasko.net resolves to the IP addresses 35.212.67.129.
Where are Yurasko.net servers located in?
• Yurasko.net has servers located in Washington, District of Columbia, 56972, United States.
yurasko.net Profile

Title:yurasko.net – William F. Yurasko's web site
What technologies does yurasko.net use?
These are the technologies used at yurasko.net. yurasko.net has a total of 5 technologies installed in 7 different categories.yurasko.net Traffic Analysis
Yurasko.net is ranked #6,209,162 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 74 visitors daily, generating a total of 145 pageviews. This equates to about 2.2K monthly visitors.Daily Visitors74
Monthly Visits2.2K
Pages per Visit1.96
Visit duration00:46
Bounce Rate45.58%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
- Daily Unique Visitors:
- 74
- Monthly Visits:
- 2,242
- Pages per Visit:
- 1.96
- Daily Pageviews:
- 145
- Avg. visit duration:
- 00:46
- Bounce rate:
- 45.58%
- Global Reach:
- 1.5E-6%
- Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
- 2,182
- HypeRank:
- 6,209,162
- SEMrush Rank:
- 1,339,310
- SimilarWeb Rank:
- 6,209,162
Total Visits Last 3 Months
2.1K
JAN
2.2K
FEB
2.2K
MAR
Visitors by country
- Country
- Users%
- United States 100.00%
Backlinks Report ▼
Yurasko.net has a total of 1,327 backlinks from 144 referring domains and most of them comes from United States.- Total Backlinks:
- 1,327
- Follow Links:
- n/a
- Nofollow Links:
- n/a
- Referring Domains:
- 144
- Referring IPs:
- 151
- Authority Domain Score:
- 23
Backlinks by country
- Country
- Domains
- United States 19
- Romania 7
- Singapore 4
- Russian Federation 3
- India 3
Backlinks by TLDs
- TLD Distribution
- Domains
- .com
- 79
- .info
- 9
- .dev
- 8
- .edu
- 0
- .gov
- 0
Last update was 5 hours ago
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...
Update will be available in 19 hours
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...
Update will be available in 19 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with yurasko.net in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.
Search Engine Indexes ▼
Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.- Google Index:
- 2,330
▼
SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.- Domain:
- yurasko.net
- Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic) - 1,339,310
- Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP) - 1,615
- Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results) - 683
- Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords) - $167.00
Revenue report ▼
Google.com would generate approximately $0.7 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $21 and annual gross revenue of approximately $255.5. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $787.7.How much would yurasko.net make?
- Daily Revenue:
- $0.70
- Monthly Revenue:
- $21.00
- Yearly Revenue:
- $255.50
Daily earning by country
- CountryPageviewsEarning
- United States 145$0.70
Loss of money due to Adblock?
- Daily Revenue Loss:
- $0.13
- Monthly Revenue Loss:
- $3.78
- Yearly Revenue Loss:
- $46.01
- Daily Pageviews Blocked:
- 26
- Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
- 783
- Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
- 9,527
Daily revenue loss by country
- CountryBlockedLost Money
- United States 26$0.13
How much is yurasko.net worth?
- Website Value:
- $787.7
Ad Experience Report ▼
Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.Mobile summary
- Root domain:
- yurasko.net
- Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.) - Not reviewed
Desktop summary
- Root domain:
- yurasko.net
- Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.) - Not reviewed
Abusive Experience Report ▼
Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.- Root domain:
- yurasko.net
- Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.) - Not reviewed
Where is yurasko.net hosted? ▼
Yurasko.net may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.- Server IP:
- 35.212.67.129
- ASN:
- AS15169
- ISP:
- Google LLC
- Server Location:
- Washington
District of Columbia, DC
56972
United States, US
Other sites hosted on 35.212.67.129
How fast does yurasko.net load? ▼
The average loading time of yurasko.net is 102 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 84.- Average Load Time:
- 102 ms
Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop
Field Data
Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Origin Data
All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Lab Data
CSS Selector costs
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Lazy load third-party resources with facades
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Long critical network tree
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Forced reflow
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 0.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile
Field Data
Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Origin Data
All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Lab Data
Font display
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Long critical network tree
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint 3.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 2.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
INP by phase
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 3.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Forced reflow
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 4.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Does yurasko.net use compression? ▼
Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on yurasko.net are reduced by 84%.
yurasko.net use br compression.
Original size: 61.71 KB
Compressed size: 9.38 KB
File reduced by: 52.32 KB (84%)
Compressed size: 9.38 KB
File reduced by: 52.32 KB (84%)
Google Safe Browsing ▼
Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious
MyWot.com Reputation Ratings
MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. yurasko.net has 84 Safety Reputations.- Status:
- SAFE
- Safety Reputations:
- 84
- Safety Confidence:
- 9
SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼
An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. yurasko.net supports HTTPS. yurasko.net supports HTTPS
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.yurasko.net
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Mar 30 07:37:37 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 28 07:37:36 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Mar 30 07:37:37 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 28 07:37:36 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼
HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency. yurasko.net supports HTTP/2
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...
Http Header ▼
HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.server: nginx
date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 07:25:36 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-cache-enabled: True
link: <https://yurasko.net/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/", <https://yurasko.net/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/92>; rel="alternate"; title="JSON"; type="application/json", <https://yurasko.net/>; rel=shortlink
x-httpd: 1
host-header: 8441280b0c35cbc1147f8ba998a563a7
x-proxy-cache: HIT
content-encoding: br
DNS Lookup ▼
DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.Type | Ip | Target/Txt | TTL |
SOA | 14400 | ||
Mname | ns1.siteground.net | ||
Rname | root.giow1078.siteground.us | ||
Serial Number | 100332 | ||
Refresh | 86400 | ||
Retry | 7200 | ||
Expire | 3600000 | ||
Minimum TTL | 86400 | ||
TXT | 14400 | ||
MX | 86400 | ||
MX | 86400 | ||
MX | 86400 | ||
A | 35.212.67.129 | 86346 | |
NS | 86400 | ||
NS | 86400 |
Whois Lookup ▼
Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on September 30, 1998 and will expire on September 29, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Network Solutions, LLC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on September 29, 2024.- Domain Created:
- 1998-09-30
- Domain Expires:
- 2025-09-29
- Domain Updated:
- 2024-09-29
- Domain Age:
- 26 years 6 months 25 days
- Domain Registrar:
- Network Solutions, LLC
- Domain Owner:
- Yurasko
- WhoIs:
Domain Name: YURASKO.NET Registry Domain ID: 2074404_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.networksolutions.com Registrar URL: http://networksolutions.com Updated Date: 2024-09-29T14:44:28Z Creation Date: 1998-09-30T04:00:00Z Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-09-29T04:00:00Z Registrar: Network Solutions, LLC Registrar IANA ID: 2 Reseller: Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok Registry Registrant ID: Registrant Name: Yurasko Registrant Organization: Yurasko Registrant Street: 5329 Taney Ave Registrant City: Alexandria Registrant State/Province: VA Registrant Postal Code: 22304-2048 Registrant Country: US Registrant Phone: 7034895695 Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: +1.9999999999 Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email:Registry Admin ID: Admin Name: Yurasko, William Admin Organization: Yurasko Admin Street: 487 N PICKETT ST Admin City: ALEXANDRIA Admin State/Province: VA Admin Postal Code: 22304-2105 Admin Country: US Admin Phone: +1.7034895695 Admin Phone Ext: Admin Fax: +1.7039386638 Admin Fax Ext: Admin Email:
Registry Tech ID: Tech Name: Administrator, Domain Tech Organization: pair Networks Tech Street: 2403 Sidney St, Suite 210 Tech City: Pittsburgh Tech State/Province: PA Tech Postal Code: 15203 Tech Country: US Tech Phone: +1.4123817247 Tech Phone Ext: Tech Fax: +1.4123819997 Tech Fax Ext: Tech Email:
Name Server: NS1.GIOW1078.SITEGROUND.US Name Server: NS2.GIOW1078.SITEGROUND.US DNSSEC: unsigned Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8777228662 URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/ >>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-04-25T07:26:28Z