whowaswho-indology.info Whowaswho-indology.info

   
Persons of Indian Studies by Prof. Dr. Klaus Karttunen – भारतीय अध्ययन से संबद्ध व्यक्ति

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Whowaswho-indology.info?

• Whowaswho-indology.info ranks #6,724,823 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Whowaswho-indology.info?

• 6.0E-7% of global Internet users visit Whowaswho-indology.info

How many people visit Whowaswho-indology.info each day?

• Whowaswho-indology.info receives approximately 28 visitors and 38 page impressions per day.

How much Whowaswho-indology.info can earn?

• Whowaswho-indology.info should earn about $0.16/day from advertising revenue.

What is Whowaswho-indology.info estimated value?

• Estimated value of Whowaswho-indology.info is $158.19.

What IP addresses does Whowaswho-indology.info resolve to?

• Whowaswho-indology.info resolves to the IP addresses 134.76.9.14.

Where are Whowaswho-indology.info servers located in?

• Whowaswho-indology.info has servers located in Göttingen, Lower Saxony, 37077, Germany.

whowaswho-indology.info Profile

Title:Persons of Indian Studies by Prof. Dr. Klaus Karttunen – भारतीय अध्ययन से संबद्ध व्यक्ति
Edit Site Info

What technologies does whowaswho-indology.info use?

These are the technologies used at whowaswho-indology.info. whowaswho-indology.info has a total of 7 technologies installed in 10 different categories.
WordPress plugins
Autoptimize Autoptimize
Performance
Autoptimize Autoptimize
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
Security
reCAPTCHA reCAPTCHA
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Databases
MySQL MySQL

whowaswho-indology.info Traffic Analysis

Whowaswho-indology.info is ranked #6,724,823 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 28 visitors daily, generating a total of 38 pageviews. This equates to about 848.4 monthly visitors. Whowaswho-indology.info traffic has increased by 8.1% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors28
19.59%
Monthly Visits848.4
8.1%
Pages per Visit1.38
6.42%
Visit duration11:12
11100%
Bounce Rate80.89%
15.01%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
28
Monthly Visits:
848
Pages per Visit:
1.38
Daily Pageviews:
38
Avg. visit duration:
11:12
Bounce rate:
80.89%
Global Reach:
6.0E-7%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
827
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
353
HypeRank:
6,724,823
SEMrush Rank:
6,791,230
SimilarWeb Rank:
6,724,823
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
19.11%
Referral:
57.32%
Search:
23.58%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

1.6K
FEB
784.8
MAR
848.4
APR
Last update was 36 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with whowaswho-indology.info in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
9,540

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  whowaswho-indology.info
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  6,791,230
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  142
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  15
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $4.8 and annual gross revenue of approximately $58.4. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $158.2.

How much would whowaswho-indology.info make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.16
Monthly Revenue:
$4.80
Yearly Revenue:
$58.40
*All earnings values are estimates only.

How much is whowaswho-indology.info worth?

Website Value:
$158.2

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
whowaswho-indology.info
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
whowaswho-indology.info
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
whowaswho-indology.info
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is whowaswho-indology.info hosted? ▼

Whowaswho-indology.info may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
134.76.9.14
ASN:
AS207592 
ISP:
Gesellschaft fuer wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH, Goettingen 
Server Location:
Göttingen
Lower Saxony, NI
37077
Germany, DE
 

Other sites hosted on 134.76.9.14

How fast does whowaswho-indology.info load? ▼

The average loading time of whowaswho-indology.info is 499 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 97.
Average Load Time:
499 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 49% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 49% 39% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 39% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 67% 23% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 23% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 84% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 49% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 49% 39% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 39% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 67% 23% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 23% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 84% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Speed Index 1.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 0.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

97
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.5s 49% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 39% 44% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 44% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.2s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 63% 25% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 25% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 81% 13% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.5s 39% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 39% 44% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 44% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.2s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 63% 25% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 25% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 81% 13% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Contentful Paint 1.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Time to Interactive 4.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 4.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Max Potential First Input Delay 100 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 20 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric

Does whowaswho-indology.info use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on whowaswho-indology.info are reduced by 72%.
whowaswho-indology.info use gzip compression.
Original size: 23.24 KB
Compressed size: 6.48 KB
File reduced by: 16.76 KB (72%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SUSPICIOUS

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. whowaswho-indology.info supports HTTPS.
 whowaswho-indology.info supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: vwebfile.gwdg.de
Organization: "Gesell. f\C3\BCr wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH, G\C3\B6ttingen"
Location: Niedersachsen, DE
Issuer: Sectigo RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA
Valid from: Dec 20 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Dec 20 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Sectigo RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA
Organization: Sectigo Limited
Location: Salford, Greater Manchester, GB
Issuer: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Valid from: Nov 2 00:00:00 2018 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 23:59:59 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Organization: The USERTRUST Network
Location: Jersey City, New Jersey, US
Issuer: AAA Certificate Services
Valid from: Mar 12 00:00:00 2019 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 23:59:59 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 whowaswho-indology.info supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: nginx
date: Sat, 10 May 2025 21:28:23 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
content-length: 6637
link: <https://whowaswho-indology.info/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
link: <https://whowaswho-indology.info/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/6223>; rel="alternate"; type="application/json"
link: <https://whowaswho-indology.info/>; rel=shortlink
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 60
Mname dns1.gwdg.de
Rname hostmaster.gwdg.de
Serial Number 679233809
Refresh 21600
Retry 3600
Expire 2419200
Minimum TTL 3600
A 134.76.9.14 3521
NS dns3.gwdg.de 3521
NS dns1.gwdg.de 3521
NS dns2.gwdg.de 3521

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on April 24, 2017 and will expire on April 24, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar COREhub, S.R.L.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on April 24, 2025.
Domain Created:
2017-04-24
Domain Expires:
2026-04-24
Domain Updated:
2025-04-24
Domain Age:
8 years 1 months 22 days
Domain Registrar:
COREhub, S.R.L.
Domain Owner:
Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: whowaswho-indology.info
Registry Domain ID: 716309f4cd0c40d88088a12a615a3cc9-DONUTS
Registrar WHOIS Server: corenic.org/whois
Registrar URL: http://corenic.org
Updated Date: 2025-04-24T16:28:51Z
Creation Date: 2017-04-24T16:28:50Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-04-24T16:28:50Z
Registrar: COREhub, S.R.L.
Registrar IANA ID: 15
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +34.935275235
Domain Status: autoRenewPeriod https://icann.org/epp#autoRenewPeriod
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED
Registrant Name: REDACTED
Registrant Organization: Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen
Registrant Street: REDACTED
Registrant City: REDACTED
Registrant State/Province: 
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED
Registrant Country: DE
Registrant Phone: REDACTED
Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED
Registrant Fax: REDACTED
Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED
Registrant Email: REDACTED
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED
Admin Name: REDACTED
Admin Organization: REDACTED
Admin Street: REDACTED
Admin City: REDACTED
Admin State/Province: REDACTED
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED
Admin Country: REDACTED
Admin Phone: REDACTED
Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED
Admin Fax: REDACTED
Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED
Admin Email: REDACTED
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED
Tech Name: REDACTED
Tech Organization: REDACTED
Tech Street: REDACTED
Tech City: REDACTED
Tech State/Province: REDACTED
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED
Tech Country: REDACTED
Tech Phone: REDACTED
Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED
Tech Fax: REDACTED
Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED
Tech Email: REDACTED
Name Server: dns1.gwdg.de
Name Server: dns2.gwdg.de
Name Server: dns3.gwdg.de
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-05-10T21:29:40Z