telegra.ph Telegra.ph

   
Telegraph

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Telegra.ph?

• Telegra.ph ranks #25,992 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Telegra.ph?

• 0.0093305% of global Internet users visit Telegra.ph

How many people visit Telegra.ph each day?

• Telegra.ph receives approximately 460K visitors and 982,940 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Telegra.ph receive most of its visitors from?

• Telegra.ph is mostly visited by people located in Russian Federation,United States,Ukraine.

How much Telegra.ph can earn?

• Telegra.ph should earn about $1,713.32/day from advertising revenue.

What is Telegra.ph estimated value?

• Estimated value of Telegra.ph is $1,736,010.46.

What IP addresses does Telegra.ph resolve to?

• Telegra.ph resolves to the IP addresses 149.154.164.13.

Where are Telegra.ph servers located in?

• Telegra.ph has servers located in London, England, EC1N, United Kingdom.

telegra.ph Profile

Title:Telegraph Description:Telegra.ph is a minimalist publishing tool that allows you to create richly formatted posts and push them to the Web in just a click. Telegraph posts also get beautiful Instant View pages on Telegram.
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Other Computers Electronics and Technology
About: Telegra.ph is a minimalist publishing tool created by the team behind Telegram Messenger. It allows users to quickly create and publish articles without the need for an account or extensive formatting options. The interface is clean and straightforward, focusing purely on the content, so users can write text, insert images, and embed media easily. One of the standout features of Telegra.ph is its anonymity; you don't need to create an account to publish articles. This makes it an attractive option for users who want to share content quickly and efficiently without any barriers.
*This text is generated by artificial intelligence and may not be accurate. Edit Site Info

What technologies does telegra.ph use?

These are the technologies used at telegra.ph. telegra.ph has a total of 4 technologies installed in 5 different categories.
Security
HSTS HSTS
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph

telegra.ph Traffic Analysis

Telegra.ph is ranked #25,992 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 460K visitors daily, generating a total of 1M pageviews. This equates to about 13.9M monthly visitors. Telegra.ph traffic has decreased by 23.29% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors460K
24.95%
Monthly Visits13.9M
23.29%
Pages per Visit2.14
10.78%
Visit duration01:54
12.82%
Bounce Rate68.23%
0.63%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
459,985
Monthly Visits:
13,937,546
Pages per Visit:
2.14
Daily Pageviews:
982,940
Avg. visit duration:
01:54
Bounce rate:
68.23%
Global Reach:
0.0093305%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
21,851,993
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
12,278,765
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
13,938,932
HypeRank:
25,992
SEMrush Rank:
109,281
SimilarWeb Rank:
5,060
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
69.12%
Referral:
8.91%
Search:
18.61%
Social:
3.18%
Paid:
0.18%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
27.63%
Mobile:
72.37%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

19.8M
FEB
18.2M
MAR
13.9M
APR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Russian Federation 56.15%
 
United States 5.47%
 
Ukraine 4.00%
 
Germany 3.47%
 
Belarus 2.25%

Where do visitors go on telegra.ph?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
telegra.ph
100.00%99.98%1.9
OTHER
0%0.02%0

Which sites are competitors to telegra.ph?

Websites similar to telegra.ph are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 58 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with telegra.ph in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
6,830,000
Bing Index:
400

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  telegra.ph
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  109,281
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  55,209
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  17,513
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $1,913.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $1.7K per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $51.4K and annual gross revenue of approximately $625.4K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1.7M.

How much would telegra.ph make?

Daily Revenue:
$1,713.32
Monthly Revenue:
$51,399.60
Yearly Revenue:
$625,361.80
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 53,721$259.47
 
Russian Federation 551,906$226.28
 
Germany 34,072$47.70
 
Ukraine 39,293$18.07
 
Belarus 22,125$11.95

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$77.66
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$2,329.78
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$28,345.60
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
59,985
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
1,799,561
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
21,894,655

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 9,670$46.70
 
Germany 9,881$13.83
 
Russian Federation 33,114$13.58
 
Ukraine 5,108$2.35
 
Belarus 2,212$1.19

How much is telegra.ph worth?

Website Value:
$1.7M

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
telegra.ph
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2025-05-12 06:05:31
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Passing

Desktop summary

Root domain:
telegra.ph
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2025-05-12 06:05:31
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Passing

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
telegra.ph
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2025-05-12 06:05:31
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Passing

Where is telegra.ph hosted? ▼

Telegra.ph may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
149.154.164.13
ASN:
AS62041 
ISP:
Telegram Messenger LLP 
Server Location:
London
England, ENG
EC1N
United Kingdom, GB
 

Other sites hosted on 149.154.164.13

How fast does telegra.ph load? ▼

The average loading time of telegra.ph is 313 ms. The Desktop speed index is 98 and mobile speed index is 84.
Average Load Time:
313 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 89% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)632ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 84% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 10% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)80ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 86% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)586ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 85% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 86% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)45ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 1.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Contentful Paint 0.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Speed Index 1.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 1.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

84
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)792ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 75% 17% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 17% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 70% 16% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)554ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 53% 16% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 16% 30% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 30%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 81% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 92% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)893ms 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 71% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 76% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)112ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 81% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Lab Data

Speed Index 3.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Contentful Paint 2.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Time to Interactive 3.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint 3.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Does telegra.ph use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on telegra.ph are reduced by 68%.
telegra.ph use gzip compression.
Original size: 4.47 KB
Compressed size: 1.41 KB
File reduced by: 3.06 KB (68%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. telegra.ph has 71 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  71
Safety Confidence:
  25

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. telegra.ph supports HTTPS.
 telegra.ph supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.telegra.ph
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: Sep 13 13:00:16 2024 GMT
Valid until: Oct 15 13:00:16 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Common Name: Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2
Organization: "GoDaddy.com, Inc.", OU = http://certs.godaddy.com/repository/
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, US
Issuer: Go Daddy Root Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: May 3 07:00:00 2011 GMT
Valid until: May 3 07:00:00 2031 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Go Daddy Root Certificate Authority - G2
Organization: "GoDaddy.com, Inc."
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, US
Issuer:
Valid from: Jan 1 07:00:00 2014 GMT
Valid until: May 30 07:00:00 2031 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name:
Organization: "The Go Daddy Group, Inc.", OU = Go Daddy Class 2 Certification Authori
Location: US
Issuer:
Valid from: Jun 29 17:06:20 2004 GMT
Valid until: Jun 29 17:06:20 2034 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 telegra.ph supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: nginx/1.20.1
date: Thu, 29 May 2025 20:01:13 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
content-length: 1444
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
pragma: no-cache
cache-control: no-store
content-encoding: gzip
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 149.154.164.13 119
NS ns-cloud-c4.googledomains.com 18180
NS ns-cloud-c3.googledomains.com 18180
NS ns-cloud-c1.googledomains.com 18180
NS ns-cloud-c2.googledomains.com 18180