rutapass.cl Rutapass.cl

   
Inicio | RutaPass

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Rutapass.cl?

• Rutapass.cl ranks #212,896 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Rutapass.cl?

• 9.09E-5% of global Internet users visit Rutapass.cl

How many people visit Rutapass.cl each day?

• Rutapass.cl receives approximately 4.5K visitors and 23,777 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Rutapass.cl receive most of its visitors from?

• Rutapass.cl is mostly visited by people located in Chile,Spain,Argentina.

How much Rutapass.cl can earn?

• Rutapass.cl should earn about $16.83/day from advertising revenue.

What is Rutapass.cl estimated value?

• Estimated value of Rutapass.cl is $16,018.56.

What IP addresses does Rutapass.cl resolve to?

• Rutapass.cl resolves to the IP addresses 208.109.224.121.

Where are Rutapass.cl servers located in?

• Rutapass.cl has servers located in United States.

rutapass.cl Profile

Title: Inicio | RutaPass
Category:Finance / Financial Planning and Management
Edit Site Info

What technologies does rutapass.cl use?

These are the technologies used at rutapass.cl. rutapass.cl has a total of 11 technologies installed in 10 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server
Phusion Passenger Phusion Passenger
UI frameworks
Bootstrap Bootstrap
Web Frameworks
Django Django
Font Scripts
Font Awesome Font Awesome
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Maps
Leaflet Leaflet
Miscellaneous
PWA PWA
Security
reCAPTCHA reCAPTCHA
Programming Languages
Python Python

rutapass.cl Traffic Analysis

Rutapass.cl is ranked #212,896 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 4.5K visitors daily, generating a total of 23.8K pageviews. This equates to about 135.8K monthly visitors. Rutapass.cl traffic has increased by 65.31% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors4.5K
99.96%
Monthly Visits135.8K
65.31%
Pages per Visit5.31
6.56%
Visit duration03:08
21.56%
Bounce Rate22.49%
68.15%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
4,482
Monthly Visits:
135,805
Pages per Visit:
5.31
Daily Pageviews:
23,777
Avg. visit duration:
03:08
Bounce rate:
22.49%
Global Reach:
9.09E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
144,098
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
109,753
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
133,128
HypeRank:
212,896
SEMrush Rank:
4,252,242
SimilarWeb Rank:
212,896
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
68.77%
Referral:
10.17%
Search:
20.73%
Social:
0.17%
Paid:
0.17%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
36.63%
Mobile:
63.37%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

207.3K
DEC
82.2K
JAN
135.8K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Chile 99.23%
 
Spain 0.59%
 
Argentina 0.18%

Which sites are competitors to rutapass.cl?

Websites similar to rutapass.cl are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 7 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with rutapass.cl in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  rutapass.cl
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  4,252,242
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  71
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  66
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $16.8 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $504.9 and annual gross revenue of approximately $6.1K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $16K.

How much would rutapass.cl make?

Daily Revenue:
$16.83
Monthly Revenue:
$504.90
Yearly Revenue:
$6,142.95
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Chile 23,595$16.75
 
Spain 140$0.07
 
Argentina 43$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$2.19
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$65.76
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$800.08
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
3,100
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
92,994
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
1,131,432

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Chile 3,067$2.18
 
Spain 27$0.01
 
Argentina 6$0.00

How much is rutapass.cl worth?

Website Value:
$16K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
rutapass.cl
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
rutapass.cl
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
rutapass.cl
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is rutapass.cl hosted? ▼

Rutapass.cl may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
208.109.224.121
ASN:
AS398101 
ISP:
GO-DADDY-COM-LLC  
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 208.109.224.121

How fast does rutapass.cl load? ▼

The average loading time of rutapass.cl is 256 ms. The Desktop speed index is 87 and mobile speed index is 59.
Average Load Time:
256 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

87
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)851ms 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 71% 24% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 24% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 69% 20% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 20% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)48ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.5s 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 75% 16% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 16% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)764ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 78% 18% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 18% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 76% 15% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)48ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 80% 12% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 12% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint 2.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 100 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 2.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Total Blocking Time 50 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 1.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

59
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)905ms 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 58% 35% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 35% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 63% 24% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 24% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)144ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 86% 11% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 11% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.2s 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 58% 28% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 28% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 12%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)861ms 66% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 66% 28% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 71% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)129ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 87% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 10% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.7s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 69% 20% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 20% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Speed Index 7.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 12.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Total Blocking Time 40 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint 11.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 5.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Max Potential First Input Delay 80 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Does rutapass.cl use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on rutapass.cl are reduced by 81%.
rutapass.cl use br compression.
Original size: 23.11 KB
Compressed size: 4.35 KB
File reduced by: 18.76 KB (81%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. rutapass.cl supports HTTPS.
 rutapass.cl supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.rutapass.cl
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
Valid from: Apr 25 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: May 25 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
Organization: Sectigo Limited
Location: Salford, Greater Manchester, GB
Issuer: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Valid from: Nov 2 00:00:00 2018 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 23:59:59 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Organization: The USERTRUST Network
Location: Jersey City, New Jersey, US
Issuer: AAA Certificate Services
Valid from: Mar 12 00:00:00 2019 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 23:59:59 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 rutapass.cl supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
vary: Origin,Cookie,Accept-Encoding
referrer-policy: same-origin
x-frame-options: DENY
x-content-type-options: nosniff
date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:24:42 GMT
x-powered-by: Phusion Passenger(R) 6.0.23
set-cookie: csrftoken=KypJQG8EK8NqjyGktLIjXp4OAaWIRJ0xD5SSazfi6ZIMyItUk9OPr446ZJPXVsAp; expires=Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:24:42 GMT; Max-Age=31449600; Path=/; SameSite=Lax
content-security-policy: upgrade-insecure-requests;
status: 200 OK
content-encoding: br
content-length: 4451
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
server: Apache

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT v=spf1 include:secureserver.net include:_spf.wpe.cl -all 3600
TXT D6094885 3600
TXT 7uh5kl57t1cltm2u5n931tk3cj 3600
TXT google-site-verification=W7fZca7Y366ZFlsButIGRuDl8Hs1gXKTquPOzF0k6YQ 3600
MX mx.zm002.zimbramail.cl 3600
MX alt1.mx.zm002.zimbramail.cl 3600
MX alt2.mx.zm002.zimbramail.cl 3600
SOA 3600
Mname ns45.domaincontrol.com
Rname dns.jomax.net
Serial Number 2024102102
Refresh 28800
Retry 7200
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 600
A 208.109.224.121 542
NS ns46.domaincontrol.com 3542
NS ns45.domaincontrol.com 3542

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.
Domain Registrar:
NIC Chile
Domain Owner:
SACYR CONCESIONES CHILE S.A. (SACYR CONCESIONES CH
WhoIs:
 

%%
%% This is the NIC Chile Whois server (whois.nic.cl).
%%
%% Rights restricted by copyright.
%% See https://www.nic.cl/normativa/politica-publicacion-de-datos-cl.pdf
%%

Domain name: rutapass.cl
Registrant name: SACYR CONCESIONES CHILE S.A. (SACYR CONCESIONES CHILE SPA)
Registrant organisation: 
Registrar name: NIC Chile
Registrar URL: https://www.nic.cl
Creation date: 2022-08-12 17:34:54 CLST
Expiration date: 2026-08-12 17:34:54 CLST
Name server: ns45.domaincontrol.com
Name server: ns46.domaincontrol.com

%%
%% For communication with domain contacts please use website.
%% See https://www.nic.cl/registry/Whois.do?d=rutapass.cl
%%