qtext.io Qtext.io

   
Quick Text - Easiest way of online text sharing 📠

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Qtext.io?

• Qtext.io ranks #256,154 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Qtext.io?

• 0.000155% of global Internet users visit Qtext.io

How many people visit Qtext.io each day?

• Qtext.io receives approximately 7.6K visitors and 14,251 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Qtext.io receive most of its visitors from?

• Qtext.io is mostly visited by people located in India,United States,Nepal.

How much Qtext.io can earn?

• Qtext.io should earn about $23.47/day from advertising revenue.

What is Qtext.io estimated value?

• Estimated value of Qtext.io is $22,519.37.

What IP addresses does Qtext.io resolve to?

• Qtext.io resolves to the IP addresses 78.46.217.104.

Where are Qtext.io servers located in?

• Qtext.io has servers located in Germany.

qtext.io Profile

Title:Quick Text - Easiest way of online text sharing 📠 Description:Easy, fast and secure online text sharing. You don't have to any registration it's free forever. The fastest way to share. You can create a quick text, convert an image to text and send it to your friends, or share anything else you need!
Tags:
collaborative
publish
image
sharing
convert
real-time
text editor
url
text
online
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Other Computers Electronics and Technology
Edit Site Info

What technologies does qtext.io use?

These are the technologies used at qtext.io. qtext.io has a total of 12 technologies installed in 10 different categories.
UI frameworks
Bootstrap Bootstrap
CDN
cdnjs cdnjs
jsDelivr jsDelivr
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
PWA PWA
JavaScript Frameworks
Socket.io Socket.io
Operating Systems
Ubuntu Ubuntu
Programming Languages
Node.js Node.js

qtext.io Traffic Analysis

Qtext.io is ranked #256,154 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 7.6K visitors daily, generating a total of 14.3K pageviews. This equates to about 231.6K monthly visitors. Qtext.io traffic has decreased by 75.48% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors7.6K
61.43%
Monthly Visits231.6K
75.48%
Pages per Visit1.86
12.64%
Visit duration02:35
69.41%
Bounce Rate47.22%
12.79%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
7,642
Monthly Visits:
231,553
Pages per Visit:
1.86
Daily Pageviews:
14,251
Avg. visit duration:
02:35
Bounce rate:
47.22%
Global Reach:
0.000155%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
29,545
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
20,992
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
226,986
HypeRank:
256,154
SEMrush Rank:
1,346,360
SimilarWeb Rank:
256,154
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
43.45%
Referral:
3.13%
Search:
51.16%
Social:
1.69%
Paid:
0.57%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
96.72%
Mobile:
3.28%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

99.4K
DEC
0.9M
JAN
231.6K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
India 45.80%
 
United States 12.67%
 
Nepal 11.60%
 
Brazil 6.86%
 
Turkey 5.10%

Which sites are competitors to qtext.io?

Websites similar to qtext.io are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Domain
CompareDaily Visitors
protectedtext.com
Compare >14.3K
onetimesecret.com
Compare >14.2K
Last update was 89 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with qtext.io in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
185

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  qtext.io
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  1,346,360
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  190
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  695
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $286.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $23.5 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $704.1 and annual gross revenue of approximately $8.6K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $22.5K.

How much would qtext.io make?

Daily Revenue:
$23.47
Monthly Revenue:
$704.10
Yearly Revenue:
$8,566.55
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 1,806$8.72
 
India 6,527$2.48
 
Brazil 978$1.30
 
Nepal 1,653$0.38
 
Turkey 727$0.14

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$2.36
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$70.79
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$861.30
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
2,295
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
68,859
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
837,783

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 325$1.57
 
India 1,828$0.69
 
Brazil 59$0.08
 
Turkey 51$0.01
 
Nepal 33$0.01

How much is qtext.io worth?

Website Value:
$22.5K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
qtext.io
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
qtext.io
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
qtext.io
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is qtext.io hosted? ▼

Qtext.io may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
78.46.217.104
ASN:
AS24940 
ISP:
Hetzner Online GmbH 
Server Location:

Germany, DE
 

Other sites hosted on 78.46.217.104

How fast does qtext.io load? ▼

The average loading time of qtext.io is 409 ms. The Desktop speed index is 94 and mobile speed index is 72.
Average Load Time:
409 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

94
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)796ms 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 75% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 75% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)34ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.9s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 83% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)568ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)40ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint 1.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Time to Interactive 1.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 1.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Speed Index 1.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

72
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 55% 28% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28% 15% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.2s 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 67% 16% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16% 15% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)89ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 77% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)813ms 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 74% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 77% 11% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)127ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 84% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 10% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 84% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Lab Data

Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Speed Index 4.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 5.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Max Potential First Input Delay 80 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 3.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint 5.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Does qtext.io use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on qtext.io are reduced by 66%.
qtext.io use gzip compression.
Original size: 11.69 KB
Compressed size: 3.96 KB
File reduced by: 7.72 KB (66%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. qtext.io supports HTTPS.
 qtext.io supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: qtext.io
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Feb 13 13:13:46 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 14 13:13:45 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 qtext.io supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: nginx/1.14.0 (Ubuntu)
date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:25:02 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
set-cookie: client-id=cc16f3ea40f9483aaa1116e7e50ddd19; Expires=Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:25:02 GMT; Max-Age=86400; Path=/
key: mvwl
content-encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 78.46.217.104 248
NS daniella.ns.cloudflare.com 3548
NS paul.ns.cloudflare.com 3548
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on August 6, 2019 and will expire on August 6, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar NAMECHEAP INC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on July 9, 2024.
Domain Created:
2019-08-06
Domain Expires:
2025-08-06
Domain Updated:
2024-07-09
Domain Age:
5 years 10 months 9 days
Domain Registrar:
NAMECHEAP INC
Domain Owner:
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy e
WhoIs:
 

Domain name: qtext.io
Registry Domain ID: d9f26dcd21a84e9eb9f5536b3ba904f3-DONUTS
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL: http://www.namecheap.com
Updated Date: 2024-07-09T15:47:35.99Z
Creation Date: 2019-08-06T19:20:51.11Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-08-06T19:20:51.11Z
Registrar: NAMECHEAP INC
Registrar IANA ID: 1068
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.9854014545
Reseller: NAMECHEAP INC
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 
Registrant Name: Redacted for Privacy
Registrant Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Registrant Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Registrant City: Reykjavik
Registrant State/Province: Capital Region
Registrant Postal Code: 101
Registrant Country: IS
Registrant Phone: +354.4212434
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID: 
Admin Name: Redacted for Privacy
Admin Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Admin Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Admin City: Reykjavik
Admin State/Province: Capital Region
Admin Postal Code: 101
Admin Country: IS
Admin Phone: +354.4212434
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID: 
Tech Name: Redacted for Privacy
Tech Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Tech Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Tech City: Reykjavik
Tech State/Province: Capital Region
Tech Postal Code: 101
Tech Country: IS
Tech Phone: +354.4212434
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email
Name Server: daniella.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: paul.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-16T22:25:52.73Z