perfectear.app Perfectear.app

   
Perfect Ear - Ear Trainer

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Perfectear.app?

• Perfectear.app ranks #3,461,696 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Perfectear.app?

• 4.5E-6% of global Internet users visit Perfectear.app

How many people visit Perfectear.app each day?

• Perfectear.app receives approximately 223 visitors and 286 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Perfectear.app receive most of its visitors from?

• Perfectear.app is mostly visited by people located in United States,Brazil,Italy.

How much Perfectear.app can earn?

• Perfectear.app should earn about $0.96/day from advertising revenue.

What is Perfectear.app estimated value?

• Estimated value of Perfectear.app is $862.15.

What IP addresses does Perfectear.app resolve to?

• Perfectear.app resolves to the IP addresses 2001:4860:4802:38::15, 216.239.36.21.

Where are Perfectear.app servers located in?

• Perfectear.app has servers located in Mountain View, California, 94035, United States.

perfectear.app Profile

Title:Perfect Ear - Ear Trainer Description:A music school in your pocket: solfège, ear training, singing, rhythm training exercises.
Category:Arts and Entertainment / Music
Edit Site Info

What technologies does perfectear.app use?

These are the technologies used at perfectear.app. perfectear.app has a total of 8 technologies installed in 6 different categories.
UI frameworks
Bootstrap Bootstrap
Performance
Google Cloud Trace Google Cloud Trace
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Modernizr Modernizr
Swiper Swiper
Widgets
OWL Carousel OWL Carousel
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
CDN
Google Cloud Google Cloud

perfectear.app Traffic Analysis

Perfectear.app is ranked #3,461,696 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 223 visitors daily, generating a total of 286 pageviews. This equates to about 6.8K monthly visitors. Perfectear.app traffic has increased by 12.83% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors223
17.46%
Monthly Visits6.8K
12.83%
Pages per Visit1.28
14.43%
Visit duration00:06
144.53%
Bounce Rate61.33%
33.87%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
223
Monthly Visits:
6,757
Pages per Visit:
1.28
Daily Pageviews:
286
Avg. visit duration:
00:06
Bounce rate:
61.33%
Global Reach:
4.5E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
1,944
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
1,884
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
6,568
HypeRank:
3,461,696
SEMrush Rank:
2,851,161
SimilarWeb Rank:
3,461,696
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
13.84%
Referral:
0%
Search:
84.00%
Social:
2.16%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

5.2K
JAN
6K
FEB
6.8K
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 52.87%
 
Brazil 24.39%
 
Italy 10.59%
 
Netherlands 5.90%
 
Canada 4.86%

Which sites are competitors to perfectear.app?

Websites similar to perfectear.app are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 57 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with perfectear.app in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
2

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  perfectear.app
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  2,851,161
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  50
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  167
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $7.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $28.8 and annual gross revenue of approximately $350.4. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $862.2.

How much would perfectear.app make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.96
Monthly Revenue:
$28.80
Yearly Revenue:
$350.40
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 151$0.73
 
Brazil 70$0.09
 
Canada 14$0.08
 
Netherlands 17$0.03
 
Italy 30$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.16
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$4.94
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$60.13
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
43
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
1,287
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
15,658

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 27$0.13
 
Canada 3$0.02
 
Brazil 4$0.01
 
Netherlands 3$0.01
 
Italy 5$0.00

How much is perfectear.app worth?

Website Value:
$862.2

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
perfectear.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
perfectear.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
perfectear.app
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is perfectear.app hosted? ▼

Perfectear.app may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2001:4860:4802:38::15, 216.239.36.21
ASN:
AS15169 
ISP:
Google LLC 
Server Location:
Mountain View
California, CA
94035
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 216.239.36.21

How fast does perfectear.app load? ▼

The average loading time of perfectear.app is 67 ms. The Desktop speed index is 98 and mobile speed index is 66.
Average Load Time:
67 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Time to Interactive 0.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Speed Index 1.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint 0.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

66
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Time to Interactive 5.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 8.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Contentful Paint 2.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 5.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 80 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Total Blocking Time 30 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests

Does perfectear.app use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on perfectear.app are reduced by 76%.
perfectear.app use gzip compression.
Original size: 18.47 KB
Compressed size: 4.41 KB
File reduced by: 14.07 KB (76%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. perfectear.app supports HTTPS.
 perfectear.app supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: perfectear.app
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WR3
Valid from: Mar 2 11:28:39 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 31 12:14:47 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: WR3
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R1
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: GTS Root R1
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Jun 19 00:00:42 2020 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 perfectear.app supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 01:36:21 GMT
expires: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 01:46:21 GMT
cache-control: public, max-age=600
etag: "dztDkA"
x-cloud-trace-context: 2897ff37e4d27a95c6f4de9546e40fef
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
server: Google Frontend

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.perfectear.app ~all 3600
TXT google-site-verification=0tQFS1kPVt8wuMF2mGasM2I4_XXwErfqngAhyZAMebg 3600
TXT google-site-verification=DMoy9Db8gBuqWZOtyF9BH_19LF-3YySN82lH6nbLDuI 3600
MX aspmx.l.google.com 3600
MX alt3.aspmx.l.google.com 3600
MX alt2.aspmx.l.google.com 3600
MX alt1.aspmx.l.google.com 3600
MX alt4.aspmx.l.google.com 3600
SOA 3600
Mname ns31.domaincontrol.com
Rname dns.jomax.net
Serial Number 2022052201
Refresh 28800
Retry 7200
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 600
AAAA 2001:4860:4802:32::15 3531
AAAA 2001:4860:4802:34::15 3531
AAAA 2001:4860:4802:36::15 3531
AAAA 2001:4860:4802:38::15 3531
A 216.239.38.21 3531
A 216.239.34.21 3531
A 216.239.32.21 3531
A 216.239.36.21 3531
NS ns32.domaincontrol.com 3600
NS ns31.domaincontrol.com 3600