orefolder.jp Orefolder.jp

   
OREFOLDER – Androidスマホとホーム画面カスタマイズとガジェット、そして格安SIMなブログメディア

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Orefolder.jp?

• Orefolder.jp ranks #130,953 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Orefolder.jp?

• 0.0003438% of global Internet users visit Orefolder.jp

How many people visit Orefolder.jp each day?

• Orefolder.jp receives approximately 16.9K visitors and 23,552 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Orefolder.jp receive most of its visitors from?

• Orefolder.jp is mostly visited by people located in Japan,United States,Viet Nam.

How much Orefolder.jp can earn?

• Orefolder.jp should earn about $9.36/day from advertising revenue.

What is Orefolder.jp estimated value?

• Estimated value of Orefolder.jp is $8,705.46.

What IP addresses does Orefolder.jp resolve to?

• Orefolder.jp resolves to the IP addresses 103.3.1.98.

Where are Orefolder.jp servers located in?

• Orefolder.jp has servers located in Japan.

orefolder.jp Profile

Title:OREFOLDER – Androidスマホとホーム画面カスタマイズとガジェット、そして格安SIMなブログメディア Description:Androidスマホとホーム画面カスタマイズとガジェット、そして格安SIMなブログメディア
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Other Computers Electronics and Technology
Edit Site Info

What technologies does orefolder.jp use?

These are the technologies used at orefolder.jp. orefolder.jp has a total of 8 technologies installed in 10 different categories.
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
Site Kit Site Kit
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
Performance
Priority Hints Priority Hints
WordPress plugins
Site Kit Site Kit
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Databases
MySQL MySQL

orefolder.jp Traffic Analysis

Orefolder.jp is ranked #130,953 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 16.9K visitors daily, generating a total of 23.6K pageviews. This equates to about 513.5K monthly visitors. Orefolder.jp traffic has decreased by 14.48% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors16.9K
0.73%
Monthly Visits513.5K
14.48%
Pages per Visit1.39
4.22%
Visit duration01:43
58.07%
Bounce Rate78.01%
0.97%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
16,948
Monthly Visits:
513,524
Pages per Visit:
1.39
Daily Pageviews:
23,552
Avg. visit duration:
01:43
Bounce rate:
78.01%
Global Reach:
0.0003438%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
618,360
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
520,650
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
498,460
HypeRank:
130,953
SEMrush Rank:
2,876,186
SimilarWeb Rank:
130,953
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
23.49%
Referral:
0.84%
Search:
72.99%
Social:
0.85%
Paid:
1.83%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
24.98%
Mobile:
75.02%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

432.5K
DEC
600.5K
JAN
513.5K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Japan 98.92%
 
United States 0.83%
 
Viet Nam 0.19%
 
Taiwan 0.05%
 
Germany 0.01%

Which sites are competitors to orefolder.jp?

Websites similar to orefolder.jp are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Domain
CompareDaily Visitors
fast.com
Compare >2M
gizmodo.jp
Compare >502.1K
xdaforums.com
Compare >345.5K
Last update was 93 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with orefolder.jp in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
22,000

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  orefolder.jp
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  2,876,186
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  520
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  167
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $9.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $280.8 and annual gross revenue of approximately $3.4K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $8.7K.

How much would orefolder.jp make?

Daily Revenue:
$9.36
Monthly Revenue:
$280.80
Yearly Revenue:
$3,416.40
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Japan 23,298$8.39
 
United States 195$0.94
 
Viet Nam 45$0.02
 
Germany 2$0.00
 
Taiwan 12$0.00

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.42
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$12.71
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$154.67
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
738
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
22,153
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
269,533

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Japan 699$0.25
 
United States 35$0.17
 
Germany 1$0.00
 
Viet Nam 2$0.00
 
Taiwan 2$0.00

How much is orefolder.jp worth?

Website Value:
$8.7K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
orefolder.jp
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
orefolder.jp
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
orefolder.jp
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is orefolder.jp hosted? ▼

Orefolder.jp may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
103.3.1.98
ASN:
AS131965 
ISP:
Xserver Inc. 
Server Location:

Japan, JP
 

Other sites hosted on 103.3.1.98

How fast does orefolder.jp load? ▼

The average loading time of orefolder.jp is 705 ms. The Desktop speed index is 98 and mobile speed index is 88.
Average Load Time:
705 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)521ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 88% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)851ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)11ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)884ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)360ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)842ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)32ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)865ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 1.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

88
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)585ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 89% 9% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)813ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)63ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)892ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)430ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)907ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)99ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)947ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 3.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 3.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 40 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 0.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 90 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 3.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests

Does orefolder.jp use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on orefolder.jp are reduced by 80%.
orefolder.jp use br compression.
Original size: 50.32 KB
Compressed size: 9.65 KB
File reduced by: 40.67 KB (80%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. orefolder.jp supports HTTPS.
 orefolder.jp supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.orefolder.jp
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Mar 9 04:22:45 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 7 04:22:44 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 orefolder.jp supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: nginx
date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:52:23 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
vary: Accept-Encoding
link: <https://orefolder.jp/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
content-encoding: br

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT google-site-verification=s6b_5g8LI5mWmVvULm-_sqx8QlVMfLFNXrMtKa-Wa7s 3600
TXT v=spf1 +a:sv12257.xserver.jp +a:orefolder.jp +mx include:spf.sender.xserver.jp ~all 3600
MX orefolder.jp 3600
SOA 3600
Mname ns1.xserver.jp
Rname root.xserver.jp
Serial Number 0
Refresh 10800
Retry 3600
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 3600
A 103.3.1.98 3521
NS ns5.xserver.jp 3600
NS ns1.xserver.jp 3600
NS ns2.xserver.jp 3600
NS ns3.xserver.jp 3600
NS ns4.xserver.jp 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on January 14, 2024 and will expire on January 31, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar . The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on January 31, 2025.
Domain Created:
2024-01-14
Domain Expires:
2026-01-31
Domain Updated:
2025-01-31
Domain Age:
1 years 5 months 6 days
Domain Owner:
Shunta Miyagishima
WhoIs:
 

[ JPRS database provides information on network administration. Its use is    ]
[ restricted to network administration purposes. For further information,     ]
[ use 'whois -h whois.jprs.jp help'. To suppress Japanese output, add'/e'     ]
[ at the end of command, e.g. 'whois -h whois.jprs.jp ***/e'.                 ]
Domain Information:
[Domain Name]                   OREFOLDER.JP

[Registrant]                    Shunta Miyagishima

[Name Server]                   ns1.xserver.jp
[Name Server]                   ns2.xserver.jp
[Name Server]                   ns3.xserver.jp
[Name Server]                   ns4.xserver.jp
[Name Server]                   ns5.xserver.jp
[Signing Key]                   

[Created on]                    2024/01/14
[Expires on]                    2026/01/31
[Status]                        Active
[Lock Status]                   DomainTransferLocked
[Lock Status]                   AgentChangeLocked
[Last Updated]                  2025/02/01 01:05:03 (JST)

Contact Information:
[Name]                          Shunta Miyagishima
[Email]                         email
[Web Page]                       
[Postal code]                   4240005
[Postal Address]                62-7, Ishikawa,
                                Shimizu-ku, Shizuoka-City, Shizuoka
[Phone]                         09040201540
[Fax]