onlinetestpaper.com Onlinetestpaper.com

   
Online Test - Online Test

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Onlinetestpaper.com?

• Onlinetestpaper.com ranks #6,351,852 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Onlinetestpaper.com?

• 1.15E-5% of global Internet users visit Onlinetestpaper.com

How many people visit Onlinetestpaper.com each day?

• Onlinetestpaper.com receives approximately 569 visitors and 713 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Onlinetestpaper.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Onlinetestpaper.com is mostly visited by people located in India.

How much Onlinetestpaper.com can earn?

• Onlinetestpaper.com should earn about $0.27/day from advertising revenue.

What is Onlinetestpaper.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Onlinetestpaper.com is $250.77.

What IP addresses does Onlinetestpaper.com resolve to?

• Onlinetestpaper.com resolves to the IP addresses 2a02:4780:4b:d6b5:3e4a:6e37:20c:3673, 147.79.72.218.

Where are Onlinetestpaper.com servers located in?

• Onlinetestpaper.com has servers located in United States.

onlinetestpaper.com Profile

Title:Online Test - Online Test Description:Free online test to practice for Competitive exams Online Exam, Entrance Practice online test
Tags:
online test series
online test in hindi
online exam
online question paper download
tests online test gk
online test free
online test
free mock test
online exam for students
Edit Site Info

What technologies does onlinetestpaper.com use?

These are the technologies used at onlinetestpaper.com. onlinetestpaper.com has a total of 15 technologies installed in 15 different categories.
WordPress themes
Astra Astra
Page builders
Elementor Elementor
Advertising
Google AdSense Google AdSense
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
Site Kit Site Kit
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Open Graph Open Graph
Hosting
Hostinger Hostinger
CDN
Hostinger CDN Hostinger CDN
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Caching
Litespeed Cache Litespeed Cache
WordPress plugins
Litespeed Cache Litespeed Cache
Site Kit Site Kit
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Performance
Priority Hints Priority Hints
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Databases
MySQL MySQL

onlinetestpaper.com Traffic Analysis

Onlinetestpaper.com is ranked #6,351,852 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 569 visitors daily, generating a total of 713 pageviews. This equates to about 17.2K monthly visitors. Onlinetestpaper.com traffic has decreased by 15.89% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors569
48.22%
Monthly Visits17.2K
15.89%
Pages per Visit1.25
2.19%
Visit duration00:08
612.26%
Bounce Rate88.20%
65.23%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
569
Monthly Visits:
17,241
Pages per Visit:
1.25
Daily Pageviews:
713
Avg. visit duration:
00:08
Bounce rate:
88.20%
Global Reach:
1.15E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
2,340
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
1,422
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
16,903
HypeRank:
6,351,852
SEMrush Rank:
6,318,076
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,693,824
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
19.62%
Referral:
0%
Search:
80.38%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

3.2K
DEC
20.5K
JAN
17.2K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
India 100.00%
Last update was 269 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with onlinetestpaper.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1,310

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  onlinetestpaper.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  6,318,076
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  49
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  20
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $128.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.3 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $8.1 and annual gross revenue of approximately $98.6. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $250.8.

How much would onlinetestpaper.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.27
Monthly Revenue:
$8.10
Yearly Revenue:
$98.55
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
India 713$0.27

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.08
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$2.28
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$27.69
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
200
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
5,989
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
72,869

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
India 200$0.08

How much is onlinetestpaper.com worth?

Website Value:
$250.8

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
onlinetestpaper.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
onlinetestpaper.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
onlinetestpaper.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is onlinetestpaper.com hosted? ▼

Onlinetestpaper.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2a02:4780:4b:d6b5:3e4a:6e37:20c:3673, 147.79.72.218
ASN:
AS7029 
ISP:
Windstream Communications LLC 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 147.79.72.218

How fast does onlinetestpaper.com load? ▼

The average loading time of onlinetestpaper.com is 103 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 94.
Average Load Time:
103 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 51% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 51% 31% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 31% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 17%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.9s 55% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 55% 20% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 20% 24% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 24%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)27ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.9s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 69% 17% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 17% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 12%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 84% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 12% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 48% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 48% 40% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 40% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.2s 65% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 65% 21% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)66ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 81% 12% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 12% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 0.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint 0.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 0.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

94
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 51% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 50% 35% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 35% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 55% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 64% 22% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)154ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 84% 12% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 12% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 78% 14% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 42% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 42% 45% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 45% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 64% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 64% 23% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 23% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)169ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 81% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 16% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 80% 13% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Contentful Paint 1.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 2.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 4.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 4.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Does onlinetestpaper.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on onlinetestpaper.com are reduced by 75%.
onlinetestpaper.com use br compression.
Original size: 129.99 KB
Compressed size: 31.35 KB
File reduced by: 98.64 KB (75%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  UNKNOWN

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. onlinetestpaper.com supports HTTPS.
 onlinetestpaper.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: onlinetestpaper.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Mar 28 12:38:04 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 26 12:38:03 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 onlinetestpaper.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 20:47:04 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
content-length: 32107
x-powered-by: PHP/8.2.27
x-dns-prefetch-control: on
link: <https://onlinetestpaper.com/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
link: <https://onlinetestpaper.com/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/51>; rel="alternate"; title="JSON"; type="application/json"
link: <https://onlinetestpaper.com/>; rel=shortlink
etag: "7538-1743309125;br"
x-litespeed-cache: hit
content-encoding: br
platform: hostinger
panel: hpanel
content-security-policy: upgrade-insecure-requests
age: 12512
server: hcdn
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
x-hcdn-request-id: 3e7809f25ae35d07ab32b43c53f850de-bos-edge1
x-hcdn-cache-status: HIT
accept-ranges: bytes

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2a02:4780:4b:d6b5:3e4a:6e37:20c:3673 4
A 147.79.72.218 4
NS ns2.dns-parking.com 172744
NS ns1.dns-parking.com 172744
HINFO 3789

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on June 9, 2020 and will expire on June 9, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Hostinger Operations, UAB. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on June 9, 2024.
Domain Created:
2020-06-09
Domain Expires:
2025-06-09
Domain Updated:
2024-06-09
Domain Age:
5 years 6 months 16 days
Domain Registrar:
Hostinger Operations, UAB
Domain Owner:
Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org)
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: ONLINETESTPAPER.COM
Registry Domain ID: 2535633819_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.hostinger.com
Registrar URL: https://www.hostinger.com
Updated Date: 2024-06-09T17:16:26Z
Creation Date: 2020-06-09T12:42:54Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-06-09T12:42:54Z
Registrar: Hostinger Operations, UAB
Registrar IANA ID: 1636
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: Not Available From Registry
Registrant Name: Domain Admin
Registrant Organization: Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org)
Registrant Street: 10 Corporate Drive   
Registrant City: Burlington
Registrant State/Province: MA
Registrant Postal Code: 01803
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.8022274003
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID: Not Available From Registry
Admin Name: Domain Admin
Admin Organization: Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org)
Admin Street: 10 Corporate Drive   
Admin City: Burlington
Admin State/Province: MA
Admin Postal Code: 01803
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: +1.8022274003
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID: Not Available From Registry
Tech Name: Domain Admin
Tech Organization: Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org)
Tech Street: 10 Corporate Drive   
Tech City: Burlington
Tech State/Province: MA
Tech Postal Code: 01803
Tech Country: US
Tech Phone: +1.8022274003
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email
Name Server: ns1.dns-parking.com
Name Server: ns2.dns-parking.com
DNSSEC: Unsigned
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +37064503378
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-30T20:47:58Z