neocita.com Neocita.com

   
Turnos por Internet - NeoCita

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Neocita.com?

• Neocita.com ranks #515,657 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Neocita.com?

• 4.86E-5% of global Internet users visit Neocita.com

How many people visit Neocita.com each day?

• Neocita.com receives approximately 2.4K visitors and 6,032 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Neocita.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Neocita.com is mostly visited by people located in Argentina.

How much Neocita.com can earn?

• Neocita.com should earn about $1.51/day from advertising revenue.

What is Neocita.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Neocita.com is $1,429.77.

What IP addresses does Neocita.com resolve to?

• Neocita.com resolves to the IP addresses 200.58.102.18.

Where are Neocita.com servers located in?

• Neocita.com has servers located in Rosario, Santa Fe, 2000, Argentina.

neocita.com Profile

Title:Turnos por Internet - NeoCita Description:Turnos por Internet. Reservar cita medica por internet
Category:Finance / Financial Planning and Management
Edit Site Info

What technologies does neocita.com use?

These are the technologies used at neocita.com. neocita.com has a total of 8 technologies installed in 6 different categories.
CDN
cdnjs cdnjs
Google Hosted Libraries Google Hosted Libraries
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
Security
HSTS HSTS
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
jQuery UI jQuery UI
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx

neocita.com Traffic Analysis

Neocita.com is ranked #515,657 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 2.4K visitors daily, generating a total of 6K pageviews. This equates to about 72.5K monthly visitors. Neocita.com traffic has decreased by 35.23% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors2.4K
42.03%
Monthly Visits72.5K
35.23%
Pages per Visit2.52
42.29%
Visit duration05:49
1376.92%
Bounce Rate66.83%
23.77%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
2,394
Monthly Visits:
72,538
Pages per Visit:
2.52
Daily Pageviews:
6,032
Avg. visit duration:
05:49
Bounce rate:
66.83%
Global Reach:
4.86E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
38,674
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
19,056
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
71,100
HypeRank:
515,657
SEMrush Rank:
16,295,078
SimilarWeb Rank:
515,657
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
69.89%
Referral:
22.35%
Search:
2.15%
Social:
5.61%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
16.74%
Mobile:
83.26%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

84.7K
DEC
112K
JAN
72.5K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Argentina 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to neocita.com?

Websites similar to neocita.com are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 83 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with neocita.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
851

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  neocita.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  16,295,078
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  10
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $1.5 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $45.3 and annual gross revenue of approximately $551.2. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1.4K.

How much would neocita.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$1.51
Monthly Revenue:
$45.30
Yearly Revenue:
$551.15
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Argentina 6,032$1.51

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.21
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$6.33
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$77.06
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
844
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
25,334
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
308,235

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Argentina 844$0.21

How much is neocita.com worth?

Website Value:
$1.4K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
neocita.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
neocita.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
neocita.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is neocita.com hosted? ▼

Neocita.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
200.58.102.18
ASN:
AS27823 
ISP:
Dattatec.com 
Server Location:
Rosario
Santa Fe, S
2000
Argentina, AR
 

Other sites hosted on 200.58.102.18

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does neocita.com load? ▼

The average loading time of neocita.com is 1325 ms. The Desktop speed index is 84 and mobile speed index is 59.
Average Load Time:
1325 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

84
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)612ms 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 77% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 82% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)10ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 86% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)3ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)609ms 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 82% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)89ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint 1.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 1.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Speed Index 2.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 1.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

59
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)446ms 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 84% 10% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)89ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 84% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 14% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)631ms 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 82% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 82% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)144ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 87% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 11% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 8.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 7.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 6.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 7.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric

Does neocita.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on neocita.com are reduced by 66%.
neocita.com use gzip compression.
Original size: 13.58 KB
Compressed size: 4.56 KB
File reduced by: 9.02 KB (66%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. neocita.com supports HTTPS.
 neocita.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.neocita.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: E5
Valid from: Feb 10 03:08:40 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 11 03:08:39 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: E5
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 neocita.com does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
Server: nginx/1.14.1
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 14:57:23 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Length: 232
Connection: keep-alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=60
Location: https://www.neocita.com/
X-Cache: HIT from Backend
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx/1.14.1
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 14:57:24 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Connection: keep-alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=60
Vary: Accept-Encoding
X-Cache: HIT from Backend
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Content-Encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 200.58.102.18 2
NS aleena.ns.cloudflare.com 172502
NS remy.ns.cloudflare.com 172502
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on January 30, 2020 and will expire on January 30, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar GoDaddy.com, LLC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on March 7, 2025.
Domain Created:
2020-01-30
Domain Expires:
2026-01-30
Domain Updated:
2025-03-07
Domain Age:
5 years 4 months 23 days
Domain Registrar:
GoDaddy.com, LLC
WhoIs:
 

   Domain Name: NEOCITA.COM
   Registry Domain ID: 2486360895_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
   Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
   Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
   Updated Date: 2025-03-07T19:56:13Z
   Creation Date: 2020-01-30T13:00:38Z
   Registry Expiry Date: 2026-01-30T13:00:38Z
   Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
   Registrar IANA ID: 146
   Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
   Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
   Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
   Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
   Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
   Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
   Name Server: ALEENA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
   Name Server: REMY.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
   DNSSEC: unsigned
   URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2025-03-30T14:57:59Z