nanoreview.net Nanoreview.net

   
NanoReview – tech comparison and ratings

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Nanoreview.net?

• Nanoreview.net ranks #27,378 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Nanoreview.net?

• 0.0067758% of global Internet users visit Nanoreview.net

How many people visit Nanoreview.net each day?

• Nanoreview.net receives approximately 334K visitors and 1,040,611 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Nanoreview.net receive most of its visitors from?

• Nanoreview.net is mostly visited by people located in Russian Federation,India,United States.

How much Nanoreview.net can earn?

• Nanoreview.net should earn about $2,611.49/day from advertising revenue.

What is Nanoreview.net estimated value?

• Estimated value of Nanoreview.net is $2,697,580.11.

What IP addresses does Nanoreview.net resolve to?

• Nanoreview.net resolves to the IP addresses 104.26.12.119.

Where are Nanoreview.net servers located in?

• Nanoreview.net has servers located in Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, United States.

nanoreview.net Profile

Title:NanoReview – tech comparison and ratings Description:Most advanced comparisons of CPU, GPU, smartphones, and laptops.
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Telecommunications
About: Nanoreview.net is a website that provides detailed reviews, comparisons, and ratings for various technological products, particularly focusing on smartphones, processors, and GPUs. The site is known for its comprehensive benchmarks and in-depth analysis, helping users make informed decisions based on performance metrics and feature comparisons. It also offers a user-friendly interface where visitors can easily compare different models side by side to see how they stack up against each other in various categories like performance, price, battery life, and more.
*This text is generated by artificial intelligence and may not be accurate. Edit Site Info

What technologies does nanoreview.net use?

These are the technologies used at nanoreview.net. nanoreview.net has a total of 8 technologies installed in 6 different categories.
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
jsDelivr jsDelivr
Analytics
Cloudflare Browser Insights Cloudflare Browser Insights
RUM
Cloudflare Browser Insights Cloudflare Browser Insights
Security
HSTS HSTS
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Open Graph Open Graph
PWA PWA
JavaScript Libraries
SweetAlert2 SweetAlert2

nanoreview.net Traffic Analysis

Nanoreview.net is ranked #27,378 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 334K visitors daily, generating a total of 1M pageviews. This equates to about 10.1M monthly visitors. Nanoreview.net traffic has increased by 56.28% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors334K
73.01%
Monthly Visits10.1M
56.28%
Pages per Visit3.12
6.65%
Visit duration01:44
4.24%
Bounce Rate47.40%
11.46%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
334,042
Monthly Visits:
10,121,473
Pages per Visit:
3.12
Daily Pageviews:
1,040,611
Avg. visit duration:
01:44
Bounce rate:
47.40%
Global Reach:
0.0067758%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
14,527,144
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
8,066,651
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
9,922,032
HypeRank:
27,378
SEMrush Rank:
38,773
SimilarWeb Rank:
6,039
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
45.61%
Referral:
1.39%
Search:
52.81%
Social:
0.20%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
24.35%
Mobile:
75.65%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

10M
AUG
6.5M
SEP
10.1M
OCT

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Russian Federation 23.22%
 
India 14.28%
 
United States 7.68%
 
Ukraine 3.57%
 
Indonesia 2.98%

Where do visitors go on nanoreview.net?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
nanoreview.net
100.00%100.00%2.0

Which sites are competitors to nanoreview.net?

Websites similar to nanoreview.net are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Domain
CompareDaily Visitors
qualcomm.com
Compare >135.8K
techadvisor.com
Compare >46.3K
gsmchoice.com
Compare >19.7K
Last update was 15 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with nanoreview.net in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
165,000
Bing Index:
9,740
Baidu Index:
57

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  nanoreview.net
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  38,773
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  109,419
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  54,182
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $81,288.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $2.6K per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $78.3K and annual gross revenue of approximately $1M. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $2.7M.

How much would nanoreview.net make?

Daily Revenue:
$2,611.49
Monthly Revenue:
$78,344.70
Yearly Revenue:
$953,193.85
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 79,953$386.17
 
Russian Federation 241,662$99.08
 
India 148,630$56.48
 
Ukraine 37,123$17.08
 
Indonesia 30,970$3.41

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$95.47
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$2,863.97
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$34,844.99
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
93,296
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
2,798,876
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
34,052,996

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 14,391$69.51
 
India 41,616$15.81
 
Russian Federation 14,500$5.94
 
Ukraine 4,826$2.22
 
Indonesia 17,962$1.98

How much is nanoreview.net worth?

Website Value:
$2.7M

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
nanoreview.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
nanoreview.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
nanoreview.net
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is nanoreview.net hosted? ▼

Nanoreview.net may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
104.26.12.119
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:
Piscataway
New Jersey, NJ
08854
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 104.26.12.119

How fast does nanoreview.net load? ▼

The average loading time of nanoreview.net is 123 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
123 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)550ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)762ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)10ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)759ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)440ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)667ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)49ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)790ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 0.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
LCP request discovery  
by making the LCP image discoverable from the HTML immediately, and avoiding lazy-loading Optimize LCP
INP breakdown  
Start investigating by looking at the longest subpart. how to improve INP
Speed Index 0.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 0.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 0.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)907ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 69% 22% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 22% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 86% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)80ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)623ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 84% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)936ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)142ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 85% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 11% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)991ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

INP breakdown  
Start investigating by looking at the longest subpart. how to improve INP
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
LCP request discovery  
by making the LCP image discoverable from the HTML immediately, and avoiding lazy-loading Optimize LCP
Speed Index 1.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 1.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Does nanoreview.net use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on nanoreview.net are reduced by 77%.
nanoreview.net use br compression.
Original size: 47.11 KB
Compressed size: 10.73 KB
File reduced by: 36.39 KB (77%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. nanoreview.net has 69 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  69
Safety Confidence:
  7

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. nanoreview.net supports HTTPS.
 nanoreview.net supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: nanoreview.net
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Oct 24 17:29:58 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jan 22 18:29:55 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 nanoreview.net supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Sat, 06 Dec 2025 15:37:54 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
server: cloudflare
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
strict-transport-security: max-age=15768000
vary: accept-encoding
report-to: {"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800,"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=VQ%2Fg1GcQKdpyWqewSXO4%2BB9w5RBPzO2%2F00VEdSngaaeP6ETcoQgpdii61%2B%2BwcWGt%2BX9ArGdxgyRED9GBuQ%2FBKY6BWWJRVonSwHsycrWc2u3V5XR%2F%2FcMx2xk%3D"}]}
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
nel: {"report_to":"cf-nel","success_fraction":0.0,"max_age":604800}
content-encoding: br
cf-ray: 9a9cde03baf0b044-FRA
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 172.67.70.172 257
A 104.26.13.119 257
A 104.26.12.119 257

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on June 7, 2019 and will expire on June 7, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar NAMECHEAP INC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on May 8, 2025.
Domain Created:
2019-06-07
Domain Expires:
2026-06-07
Domain Updated:
2025-05-08
Domain Age:
6 years 6 months 14 days
Domain Registrar:
NAMECHEAP INC
Domain Owner:
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy e
WhoIs:
 

Domain name: nanoreview.net
Registry Domain ID: 2399577601_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL: http://www.namecheap.com
Updated Date: 2025-05-08T09:15:17.79Z
Creation Date: 2019-06-07T13:32:11.00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2026-06-07T13:32:11.00Z
Registrar: NAMECHEAP INC
Registrar IANA ID: 1068
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.9854014545
Reseller: NAMECHEAP INC
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 
Registrant Name: Redacted for Privacy
Registrant Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Registrant Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Registrant City: Reykjavik
Registrant State/Province: Capital Region
Registrant Postal Code: 101
Registrant Country: IS
Registrant Phone: +354.4212434
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID: 
Admin Name: Redacted for Privacy
Admin Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Admin Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Admin City: Reykjavik
Admin State/Province: Capital Region
Admin Postal Code: 101
Admin Country: IS
Admin Phone: +354.4212434
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID: 
Tech Name: Redacted for Privacy
Tech Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Tech Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Tech City: Reykjavik
Tech State/Province: Capital Region
Tech Postal Code: 101
Tech Country: IS
Tech Phone: +354.4212434
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email
Name Server: brenda.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: sonny.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-08-15T12:27:31.61Z