nanoreview.net Nanoreview.net

   
NanoReview – tech comparison and ratings

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Nanoreview.net?

• Nanoreview.net ranks #20,287 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Nanoreview.net?

0.0089888% of global Internet users visit Nanoreview.net

How many people visit Nanoreview.net each day?

• Nanoreview.net receives approximately 443.1K visitors and 1,078,032 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Nanoreview.net receive most of its visitors from?

• Nanoreview.net is mostly visited by people located in Russian Federation,India,United States.

How much Nanoreview.net can earn?

• Nanoreview.net should earn about $2,733.46/day from advertising revenue.

What is Nanoreview.net estimated value?

• Estimated value of Nanoreview.net is $2,719,231.44.

What IP addresses does Nanoreview.net resolve to?

• Nanoreview.net resolves to the IP addresses 66.135.9.38.

Where are Nanoreview.net servers located in?

• Nanoreview.net has servers located in Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, United States.

nanoreview.net Profile

Title:NanoReview – tech comparison and ratings
Description:Most advanced comparisons of chipsets, smartphones, and laptops.
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Telecommunications

What technologies does nanoreview.net use?

These are the technologies used at nanoreview.net. nanoreview.net has a total of 5 technologies installed in 5 different categories.

nanoreview.net Traffic Analysis

Nanoreview.net is ranked #20,287 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 443.1K visitors daily, generating a total of 1.1M pageviews. This equates to about 13.4M monthly visitors. Nanoreview.net traffic has decreased by 0.38% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors443.1K
8.72%
Monthly Visits13.4M
0.38%
Pages per Visit2.43
2.89%
Visit duration01:51
13.15%
Bounce Rate64.72%
0.2%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
443,142
Monthly Visits:
13,427,203
Pages per Visit:
2.43
Daily Pageviews:
1,078,032
Avg. visit duration:
01:51
Bounce rate:
64.72%
Global Reach:
0.0089888%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
39,812,411
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
13,406,509
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
13,162,648
HypeRank:
20,287
SEMrush Rank:
52,460
SimilarWeb Rank:
5,757
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
24.14%
Referral:
0.37%
Search:
75.39%
Social:
0.09%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
11.88%
Mobile:
88.12%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

12.9M
NOV
13.5M
DEC
13.4M
JAN

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Russian Federation 21.34%
 
India 12.91%
 
United States 5.41%
 
Ukraine 5.03%
 
Indonesia 3.58%

Where do visitors go on nanoreview.net?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
nanoreview.net
100.00%100.00%2.0
Last update was 17 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with nanoreview.net in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
386,000
Bing Index:
2,330
Baidu Index:
57

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  nanoreview.net
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  52,460
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  96,757
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  35,817
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $27,386.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $2.7K per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $82K and annual gross revenue of approximately $1M. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $2.7M.

How much would nanoreview.net make?

Daily Revenue:
$2,733.46
Monthly Revenue:
$82,003.80
Yearly Revenue:
$997,712.90
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 58,363$281.89
 
Russian Federation 230,041$94.32
 
India 139,221$52.90
 
Ukraine 54,227$24.94
 
Indonesia 38,543$4.24

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$76.91
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$2,307.44
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$28,073.82
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
92,694
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
2,780,823
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
33,833,347

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 10,505$50.74
 
India 38,982$14.81
 
Russian Federation 13,802$5.66
 
Ukraine 7,049$3.24
 
Indonesia 22,355$2.46

How much is nanoreview.net worth?

Website Value:
$2.7M

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
nanoreview.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
nanoreview.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
nanoreview.net
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is nanoreview.net hosted?

Nanoreview.net may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
66.135.9.38
ASN:
AS20473 
ISP:
Choopa, LLC 
Server Location:
Piscataway
New Jersey, NJ
08854
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 66.135.9.38

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does nanoreview.net load?

The average loading time of nanoreview.net is 92 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
92 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)2ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)2ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%

Lab Data

Speed Index 0.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 0.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Performance budget  
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more about performance budgets
Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint 0.3 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Timing budget  
Set a timing budget to help you keep an eye on the performance of your site. Performant sites load fast and respond to user input events quickly. Learn more about performance budgets
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 84% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)18ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 10% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)20ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 1%

Lab Data

Speed Index 1.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Timing budget  
Set a timing budget to help you keep an eye on the performance of your site. Performant sites load fast and respond to user input events quickly. Learn more about performance budgets
First Meaningful Paint 1.0 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
First Contentful Paint 1.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Time to Interactive 1.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Performance budget  
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more about performance budgets

Does nanoreview.net use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on nanoreview.net are reduced by 73%.
nanoreview.net use gzip compression.
Original size: 36.87 KB
Compressed size: 9.72 KB
File reduced by: 27.15 KB (73%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. nanoreview.net has 69 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  69
Safety Confidence:
  7

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. nanoreview.net supports HTTPS.
 nanoreview.net supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: nanoreview.net
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R3
Valid from: Jan 25 10:40:54 2024 GMT
Valid until: Apr 24 10:40:53 2024 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: R3
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Sep 4 00:00:00 2020 GMT
Valid until: Sep 15 16:00:00 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: ISRG Root X1
Organization: Internet Security Research Group
Location: US
Issuer: DST Root CA X3
Valid from: Jan 20 19:14:03 2021 GMT
Valid until: Sep 30 18:14:03 2024 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 nanoreview.net supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
server: nginx
date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 23:35:59 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
strict-transport-security: max-age=15768000
vary: accept-encoding
content-encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 300
Mname ns1.vultr.com
Rname dnsadm.choopa.com
Serial Number 0
Refresh 10800
Retry 3600
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 3600
TXT v=spf1 include:spf.privateemail.com ~all 3600
MX mx1.privateemail.com 3600
MX mx2.privateemail.com 3600
A 66.135.9.38 242
NS ns1.vultr.com 300
NS ns2.vultr.com 300

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on June 7, 2019 and will expire on June 7, 2024 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar NAMECHEAP INC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on May 8, 2023.
Domain Created:
2019-06-07
Domain Expires:
2024-06-07
Domain Updated:
2023-05-08
Domain Age:
4 years 8 months 25 days
Domain Registrar:
NAMECHEAP INC
Domain Owner:
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy e
WhoIs:
 

Domain name: nanoreview.net
Registry Domain ID: 2399577601_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL: http://www.namecheap.com
Updated Date: 2023-05-08T07:27:32.27Z
Creation Date: 2019-06-07T13:32:11.00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2024-06-07T13:32:11.00Z
Registrar: NAMECHEAP INC
Registrar IANA ID: 1068
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.9854014545
Reseller: NAMECHEAP INC
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 
Registrant Name: Redacted for Privacy
Registrant Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Registrant Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Registrant City: Reykjavik
Registrant State/Province: Capital Region
Registrant Postal Code: 101
Registrant Country: IS
Registrant Phone: +354.4212434
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID: 
Admin Name: Redacted for Privacy
Admin Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Admin Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Admin City: Reykjavik
Admin State/Province: Capital Region
Admin Postal Code: 101
Admin Country: IS
Admin Phone: +354.4212434
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID: 
Tech Name: Redacted for Privacy
Tech Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Tech Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Tech City: Reykjavik
Tech State/Province: Capital Region
Tech Postal Code: 101
Tech Country: IS
Tech Phone: +354.4212434
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email
Name Server: ns1.vultr.com
Name Server: ns2.vultr.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2024-02-13T13:36:57.30Z