lafleurs.com Lafleurs.com

   
La Fleur's Lottery World – Lottery News, Stats and Facts

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Lafleurs.com?

• Lafleurs.com ranks #3,369,706 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Lafleurs.com?

• 4.7E-6% of global Internet users visit Lafleurs.com

How many people visit Lafleurs.com each day?

• Lafleurs.com receives approximately 234 visitors and 376 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Lafleurs.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Lafleurs.com is mostly visited by people located in United States,Canada,India.

How much Lafleurs.com can earn?

• Lafleurs.com should earn about $1.63/day from advertising revenue.

What is Lafleurs.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Lafleurs.com is $1,831.65.

What IP addresses does Lafleurs.com resolve to?

• Lafleurs.com resolves to the IP addresses 34.174.91.215.

Where are Lafleurs.com servers located in?

• Lafleurs.com has servers located in Dallas, Texas, 75270, United States.

lafleurs.com Profile

Title:La Fleur's Lottery World – Lottery News, Stats and Facts Description:Email Adresses: bruce@lafleurs.com terri@lafleurs.com
Category:Gambling / Lottery
Edit Site Info

What technologies does lafleurs.com use?

These are the technologies used at lafleurs.com. lafleurs.com has a total of 11 technologies installed in 13 different categories.
Ecommerce
Cart Functionality Cart Functionality
WooCommerce WooCommerce
Page builders
Elementor Elementor
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
Security
HSTS HSTS
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
Performance
Priority Hints Priority Hints
WordPress plugins
WooCommerce WooCommerce
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Databases
MySQL MySQL

lafleurs.com Traffic Analysis

Lafleurs.com is ranked #3,369,706 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 234 visitors daily, generating a total of 376 pageviews. This equates to about 7.1K monthly visitors. Lafleurs.com traffic has increased by 15.22% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors234
84.61%
Monthly Visits7.1K
15.22%
Pages per Visit1.61
28.39%
Visit duration00:24
88.89%
Bounce Rate47.27%
3.5%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
234
Monthly Visits:
7,090
Pages per Visit:
1.61
Daily Pageviews:
376
Avg. visit duration:
00:24
Bounce rate:
47.27%
Global Reach:
4.7E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
6,336
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
5,193
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
6,876
HypeRank:
3,369,706
SEMrush Rank:
1,274,089
SimilarWeb Rank:
3,059,444
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
35.05%
Referral:
0%
Search:
64.95%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

6.8K
DEC
6.2K
JAN
7.1K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 60.64%
 
Canada 19.01%
 
India 9.21%
 
United Kingdom 8.32%
 
Spain 2.82%

Which sites are competitors to lafleurs.com?

Websites similar to lafleurs.com are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 72 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with lafleurs.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
14,400
Bing Index:
242

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  lafleurs.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  1,274,089
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  2,420
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  749
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $574.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $1.6 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $48.9 and annual gross revenue of approximately $595. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1.8K.

How much would lafleurs.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$1.63
Monthly Revenue:
$48.90
Yearly Revenue:
$594.95
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 228$1.10
 
Canada 71$0.43
 
United Kingdom 31$0.08
 
India 35$0.01
 
Spain 11$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.32
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$9.73
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$118.35
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
76
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
2,269
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
27,604

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 41$0.20
 
Canada 18$0.11
 
United Kingdom 5$0.01
 
India 10$0.00
 
Spain 2$0.00

How much is lafleurs.com worth?

Website Value:
$1.8K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
lafleurs.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
lafleurs.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
lafleurs.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is lafleurs.com hosted? ▼

Lafleurs.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
34.174.91.215
ASN:
AS396982 
ISP:
Google LLC 
Server Location:
Dallas
Texas, TX
75270
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 34.174.91.215

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does lafleurs.com load? ▼

The average loading time of lafleurs.com is 142 ms. The Desktop speed index is 96 and mobile speed index is 59.
Average Load Time:
142 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

96
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)5ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 78% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 11% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 10%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.0s 38% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 38% 33% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 33% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 63% 22% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)35ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.5s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 73% 18% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 18% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)5ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 78% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 11% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 10%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.0s 38% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 38% 33% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 33% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 63% 22% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)35ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.5s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 73% 18% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 18% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 1.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 130 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint 1.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Total Blocking Time 40 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 1.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

59
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.6s 38% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 48% 32% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 32% 18% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 18%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 58% 25% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 25% 15% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)117ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 84% 9% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 9% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.0s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 65% 21% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.6s 48% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 48% 32% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 32% 18% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 18%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 58% 25% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 25% 15% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)117ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 84% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 9% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.0s 65% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 65% 21% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 13.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 7.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Contentful Paint 5.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 30 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 13.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 80 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins

Does lafleurs.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on lafleurs.com are reduced by 81%.
lafleurs.com use br compression.
Original size: 127.42 KB
Compressed size: 23.55 KB
File reduced by: 103.87 KB (81%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. lafleurs.com has 60 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  60
Safety Confidence:
  2
Child Safety Reputations:
  10
Child Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. lafleurs.com supports HTTPS.
 lafleurs.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.lafleurs.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: GlobalSign GCC R6 AlphaSSL CA 2023
Valid from: Dec 28 06:13:41 2024 GMT
Valid until: Jan 29 06:13:40 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: GlobalSign GCC R6 AlphaSSL CA 2023
Organization: GlobalSign nv-sa
Location: BE
Issuer: GlobalSign
Valid from: Jul 19 03:43:25 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jul 19 00:00:00 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 lafleurs.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: nginx
date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 09:33:09 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-frame-options: sameorigin
x-xss-protection: 1
x-content-type-options: nosniff
strict-transport-security: max-age=2592000
referrer-policy: origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy: accelerometer=(self), autoplay=(self), camera=(self), encrypted-media=(self), fullscreen=(self), geolocation=(self), gyroscope=(self), magnetometer=(self), microphone=(self), midi=(self), payment=(self), usb=(self)
link: <https://lafleurs.com/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/", <https://lafleurs.com/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/24803>; rel="alternate"; title="JSON"; type="application/json", <https://lafleurs.com/>; rel=shortlink
x-httpd: 1
host-header: 8441280b0c35cbc1147f8ba998a563a7
x-proxy-cache: HIT
content-encoding: br

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 86400
Mname ns1.siteground.net
Rname root.us48.siteground.us
Serial Number 2020120302
Refresh 86400
Retry 7200
Expire 3600000
Minimum TTL 86400
TXT v=spf1 +mx include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.sendlane.com include:lafleurs.com.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net -all 86400
MX lafleurs.com 14400
MX lafleurs-com.mail.protection.outlook.com 14400
A 34.174.91.215 14335
NS ns2.siteground.net 86400
NS ns1.siteground.net 86400

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on August 12, 1996 and will expire on August 11, 2034 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Network Solutions, LLC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on January 21, 2025.
Domain Created:
1996-08-12
Domain Expires:
2034-08-11
Domain Updated:
2025-01-21
Domain Age:
28 years 10 months 2 days
Domain Registrar:
Network Solutions, LLC
Domain Owner:
TLF Publications, Inc.
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: LAFLEURS.COM
Registry Domain ID: 47442_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Registrar URL: http://networksolutions.com
Updated Date: 2025-01-21T17:03:08Z
Creation Date: 1996-08-12T04:00:00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2034-08-11T04:00:00Z
Registrar: Network Solutions, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 2
Reseller: 
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 
Registrant Name: TLF Publications, Inc.
Registrant Organization: TLF Publications, Inc.
Registrant Street: 14424 CHRISMAN HILL DR
Registrant City: BOYDS
Registrant State/Province: MD
Registrant Postal Code: 20841-9038
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.3019164478
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: +1.3019161718
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID: 
Admin Name: La Fleur, Bruce
Admin Organization: TLF Publications, Inc.
Admin Street: 51 Monroe St.
Admin City: Rockville
Admin State/Province: MD
Admin Postal Code: 20850
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: +1.3016106070
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: +1.3016106072
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID: 
Tech Name: La Fleur, Bruce
Tech Organization: TLF Publications, Inc.
Tech Street: 20 Courthouse Square Unit 207
Tech City: Rockville
Tech State/Province: MD
Tech Postal Code: 20850
Tech Country: US
Tech Phone: +1.3016106070
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: +1.3016106072
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email
Name Server: NS1.US48.SITEGROUND.US
Name Server: NS2.US48.SITEGROUND.US
DNSSEC: unsigned
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8777228662
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-04-02T09:34:14Z