fig.to Fig.to

   
Famous Internet Girls - Famous Onlyfans Models Leaks Free

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Fig.to?

• Fig.to ranks #68,959 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Fig.to?

• 0.0004925% of global Internet users visit Fig.to

How many people visit Fig.to each day?

• Fig.to receives approximately 24.3K visitors and 89,559 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Fig.to receive most of its visitors from?

• Fig.to is mostly visited by people located in United States,United Kingdom,Germany.

How much Fig.to can earn?

• Fig.to should earn about $362.80/day from advertising revenue.

What is Fig.to estimated value?

• Estimated value of Fig.to is $339,848.89.

What IP addresses does Fig.to resolve to?

• Fig.to resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3031::ac43:ce88, 172.67.206.136.

Where are Fig.to servers located in?

• Fig.to has servers located in United States.

fig.to Profile

Title:Famous Internet Girls - Famous Onlyfans Models Leaks Free
Description:Famous Onlyfans Models Leaks Free
Category:Adult / Adult
Edit Site Info

What technologies does fig.to use?

These are the technologies used at fig.to. fig.to has a total of 17 technologies installed in 14 different categories.
Ecommerce
Cart Functionality Cart Functionality
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
Site Kit Site Kit
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Open Graph Open Graph
PWA PWA
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Modernizr Modernizr
WordPress plugins
Perfmatters Perfmatters
Site Kit Site Kit
Yoast SEO Yoast SEO
Performance
Perfmatters Perfmatters
Priority Hints Priority Hints
Security
reCAPTCHA reCAPTCHA
Advertising
TrafficStars TrafficStars
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
SEO
Yoast SEO Yoast SEO
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Databases
MySQL MySQL

fig.to Traffic Analysis

Fig.to is ranked #68,959 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 24.3K visitors daily, generating a total of 89.6K pageviews. This equates to about 735.7K monthly visitors. Fig.to traffic has increased by 36.26% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors24.3K
36.43%
Monthly Visits735.7K
36.26%
Pages per Visit3.69
6.16%
Visit duration02:19
3.51%
Bounce Rate45.69%
13.83%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
24,282
Monthly Visits:
735,745
Pages per Visit:
3.69
Daily Pageviews:
89,559
Avg. visit duration:
02:19
Bounce rate:
45.69%
Global Reach:
0.0004925%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
704,384
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
517,905
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
721,243
HypeRank:
68,959
SEMrush Rank:
5,559,767
SimilarWeb Rank:
68,959
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
84.44%
Referral:
5.80%
Search:
9.67%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0.09%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
14.55%
Mobile:
85.45%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

402.3K
NOV
540K
DEC
735.7K
JAN

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 43.15%
 
United Kingdom 7.84%
 
Germany 7.01%
 
Canada 6.76%
 
France 5.35%

Which sites are competitors to fig.to?

Websites similar to fig.to are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 14 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 10 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with fig.to in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  fig.to
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  5,559,767
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  209
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  31
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $362.8 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $10.9K and annual gross revenue of approximately $132.4K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $339.8K.

How much would fig.to make?

Daily Revenue:
$362.80
Monthly Revenue:
$10,884.00
Yearly Revenue:
$132,422.00
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 38,647$186.67
 
Canada 6,051$36.55
 
United Kingdom 7,026$18.83
 
Germany 6,282$8.80
 
France 4,791$2.78

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$48.61
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$1,458.17
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$17,741.13
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
11,942
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
358,269
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
4,358,939

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 6,957$33.60
 
Canada 1,513$9.14
 
United Kingdom 1,124$3.01
 
Germany 1,822$2.55
 
France 527$0.31

How much is fig.to worth?

Website Value:
$339.8K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
fig.to
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
fig.to
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
fig.to
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2024-07-20 04:27:38
Enforcement:
(Chrome is preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs. You should fix the violations and submit your site for a review.)
On
EnforcementTime:
2024-07-20 04:27:38
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is fig.to hosted? ▼

Fig.to may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:3031::ac43:ce88, 172.67.206.136
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 172.67.206.136

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does fig.to load? ▼

The average loading time of fig.to is 42 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 67.
Average Load Time:
42 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)5ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 91% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.8s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 58% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15% 25% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 25%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.4s 66% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 66% 13% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 20%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)35ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.8s 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 72% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 16%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)15ms 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 63% 25% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 25% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 11%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.9s 60% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 60% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 27% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.5s 66% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 66% 11% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11% 21% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)46ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.8s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 73% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 0.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

67
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)10ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 64% 26% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 26% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.4s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 59% 9% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 30% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 30%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.3s 66% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 62% 10% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10% 26% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 26%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)110ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.1s 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 70% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 20%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)18ms 47% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 47% 31% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 31% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 20%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.6s 62% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 62% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 29% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 29%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.3s 64% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 64% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 26% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 26%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)137ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 88% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.3s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 69% 9% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 20%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 3.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Speed Index 4.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint 6.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 6.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric

Does fig.to use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on fig.to are reduced by 83%.
fig.to use br compression.
Original size: 205.78 KB
Compressed size: 34.94 KB
File reduced by: 170.83 KB (83%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. fig.to has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51
Child Safety Reputations:
  10
Child Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. fig.to supports HTTPS.
 fig.to supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: fig.to
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Feb 4 03:04:04 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 5 04:02:43 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 fig.to supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 05:49:22 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
cache-control: s-maxage=31536000, max-age=60
x-wp-spc-disk-cache: HIT
x-wp-cf-super-cache-active: 1
x-wp-cf-super-cache-cache-control: s-maxage=31536000, max-age=60
cf-cache-status: HIT
age: 8209
last-modified: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 03:32:33 GMT
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=ATMNWGU46Ll73JROhh2YAVr5e5w3Fk069X3GeshVG79m3Nzeb1xd3UrOfFFgaSUjJuVjZcH5DG4A8PQ7VDEQRn6lMAy%2F5UqrICqthWL75x%2Fd0qsw%2FjIUcqs%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
vary: Accept-Encoding
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 91b754674b20507a-ORD
content-encoding: br
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=2094&min_rtt=2016&rtt_var=567&sent=7&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3393&recv_bytes=888&delivery_rate=1293434&cwnd=170&unsent_bytes=0&cid=47351d90dc9558d4&ts=32&x=0"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3036::6815:4556 233
AAAA 2606:4700:3031::ac43:ce88 233
A 104.21.69.86 233
A 172.67.206.136 233
NS elle.ns.cloudflare.com 86333
NS burt.ns.cloudflare.com 86333
HINFO 3600