clio.me Clio.me

   
Clio beta

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Clio.me?

• Clio.me ranks #658,478 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Clio.me?

• 0.000727% of global Internet users visit Clio.me

How many people visit Clio.me each day?

• Clio.me receives approximately 9.4K visitors and 61,157 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Clio.me receive most of its visitors from?

• Clio.me is mostly visited by people located in Denmark,Sweden,Guadeloupe.

How much Clio.me can earn?

• Clio.me should earn about $95.08/day from advertising revenue.

What is Clio.me estimated value?

• Estimated value of Clio.me is $98,529.68.

What IP addresses does Clio.me resolve to?

• Clio.me resolves to the IP addresses 99.84.160.102.

Where are Clio.me servers located in?

• Clio.me has servers located in United States.

clio.me Profile

Title:Clio beta
Category:Science and Education / Education
Edit Site Info

What technologies does clio.me use?

These are the technologies used at clio.me. clio.me has a total of 5 technologies installed in 6 different categories.
CDN
Amazon Cloudfront Amazon Cloudfront
Miscellaneous
Amazon S3 Amazon S3
PaaS
Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services
Cookie compliance
Cookiebot Cookiebot
Webmail
Microsoft 365 Microsoft 365
Email
Microsoft 365 Microsoft 365

clio.me Traffic Analysis

Clio.me is ranked #658,478 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 9.4K visitors daily, generating a total of 61.2K pageviews. This equates to about 285.3K monthly visitors. Clio.me traffic has increased by 44.12% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors9.4K
12.7%
Monthly Visits285.3K
44.12%
Pages per Visit6.49
14.56%
Visit duration06:08
5.74%
Bounce Rate38.20%
6.1%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
9,417
Monthly Visits:
285,335
Pages per Visit:
6.49
Daily Pageviews:
61,157
Avg. visit duration:
06:08
Bounce rate:
38.20%
Global Reach:
0.000727%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
366,518
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
150,344
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
276,982
HypeRank:
658,478
SEMrush Rank:
1,190,584
SimilarWeb Rank:
135,175
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
45.98%
Referral:
4.95%
Search:
49.07%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
37.06%
Mobile:
62.94%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

282.6K
AUG
198K
SEP
285.3K
OCT

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Denmark 76.93%
 
Sweden 19.89%
 
Guadeloupe 0.43%
 
Thailand 0.39%
 
United States 0.34%

Where do visitors go on clio.me?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
portals.clio.me
83.08%47.22%4.1
account.clio.me
64.91%10.99%1.2
my.clio.me
43.91%38.79%6.3
dk.clio.me
10.93%1.53%1.0
dk-flow-cdn.clio.me
2.38%0.85%2.6

Which sites are competitors to clio.me?

Websites similar to clio.me are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 959 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with clio.me in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
126,000
Baidu Index:
1

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  clio.me
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  1,190,584
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  1,495
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  712
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $6,015.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $95.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $2.9K and annual gross revenue of approximately $34.7K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $98.5K.

How much would clio.me make?

Daily Revenue:
$95.08
Monthly Revenue:
$2,852.40
Yearly Revenue:
$34,704.20
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Denmark 47,046$70.57
 
Sweden 12,166$16.42
 
Guadeloupe 261$1.99
 
United States 210$1.01
 
Thailand 239$0.05

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$22.57
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$676.98
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$8,236.61
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
15,239
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
457,157
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
5,562,081

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Denmark 11,762$17.64
 
Sweden 3,407$4.60
 
United States 38$0.18
 
Guadeloupe 18$0.14
 
Thailand 14$0.00

How much is clio.me worth?

Website Value:
$98.5K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
clio.me
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
clio.me
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
clio.me
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is clio.me hosted? ▼

Clio.me may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
99.84.160.102
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 99.84.160.102

How fast does clio.me load? ▼

The average loading time of clio.me is n/a ms. The Desktop speed index is 90 and mobile speed index is 45.
Average Load Time:
n/a ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

90
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)716ms 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 77% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.8s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 58% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 21% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21%
First Input Delay (FID)3ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.6s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 58% 21% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 20%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)713ms 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 77% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.8s 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 59% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 21% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21%
First Input Delay (FID)3ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.6s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 58% 21% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 19%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 1.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more
First Meaningful Paint 1.4 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more
Largest Contentful Paint 1.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more
Avoids `unload` event listeners  
The `unload` event does not fire reliably and listening for it can prevent browser optimizations like the Back-Forward Cache. Use `pagehide` or `visibilitychange` events instead. Learn more
Timing budget  
Set a timing budget to help you keep an eye on the performance of your site. Performant sites load fast and respond to user input events quickly. Learn more
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more
Time to Interactive 1.4 s
Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn more
Performance budget  
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more
Speed Index 1.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

45
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 72% 15% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 69% 21% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)248ms 2% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 2% 95% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 95% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 2%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.1s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 60% 29% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 29% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 70% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 68% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 68% 20% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 20% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)248ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 2% 95% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 95% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 2%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.1s 60% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 60% 30% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 30% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn more
First Contentful Paint 6.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more
Largest Contentful Paint 7.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more
First Contentful Paint (3G) 13260 ms
First Contentful Paint 3G marks the time at which the first text or image is painted while on a 3G network. Learn more
Avoids `unload` event listeners  
The `unload` event does not fire reliably and listening for it can prevent browser optimizations like the Back-Forward Cache. Use `pagehide` or `visibilitychange` events instead. Learn more
Total Blocking Time 430 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more
Speed Index 6.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more
Timing budget  
Set a timing budget to help you keep an eye on the performance of your site. Performant sites load fast and respond to user input events quickly. Learn more
Max Potential First Input Delay 390 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more
First Meaningful Paint 6.1 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more
Time to Interactive 6.7 s
Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more
Performance budget  
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more

Does clio.me use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on clio.me are reduced by 55%.
clio.me use gzip compression.
Original size: 1.26 KB
Compressed size: 579 B
File reduced by: 716 B (55%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. clio.me has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. clio.me supports HTTPS.
 clio.me supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: se.clio.me
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Amazon
Valid from: May 18 00:00:00 2022 GMT
Valid until: Jun 16 23:59:59 2023 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon
Organization: Amazon, OU = Server CA 1B
Location: US
Issuer: Amazon Root CA 1
Valid from: Oct 22 00:00:00 2015 GMT
Valid until: Oct 19 00:00:00 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon Root CA 1
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: May 25 12:00:00 2015 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 01:00:00 2037 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2
Organization: "Starfield Technologies, Inc."
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, US
Issuer:
Valid from: Sep 2 00:00:00 2009 GMT
Valid until: Jun 28 17:39:16 2034 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 clio.me supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
content-length: 0
location: https://dk.clio.me/
server: CloudFront
date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 05:18:03 GMT
cache-control: max-age=3
x-cache: Miss from cloudfront
via: 1.1 1653617c8dfc2e48beca446a9a4426a0.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
x-amz-cf-pop: ORD52-C2
x-amz-cf-id: mRtcp2JJRRiyD7W24JLtrs8EXtdAUTeddFOsyedhU0WwMoqU5mVj9A==

HTTP/2 200 
content-type: text/html
date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 09:45:17 GMT
last-modified: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 08:09:05 GMT
etag: W/"ae57b9c3d7faead87e753348a029ae82"
server: AmazonS3
content-encoding: gzip
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-cache: Hit from cloudfront
via: 1.1 b89903d8d440c2d657cc902d956ab98e.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
x-amz-cf-pop: ORD52-C1
x-amz-cf-id: bmzwRm6yHtth4NB9iTtWHcHTTJZO7XJkrpkbJxcQCKMYwBrg0efTFg==
age: 70366

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT v=spf1 ip4:185.21.41.137/32 ip4:205.201.128.0/20 ip4:198.2.128.0/18 ip4:148.105.8.0/21 ip4:85.235.247.20/32 ip4:37.188.97.188/32 ip6:2a04:35c0::/29 ip4:205.201.139.44 ip4:198.37.146.37/32 include:spfa.clio.me include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mktomail.com include:_spf.etrack1.com ~all 243
TXT MS=ms48684523 243
TXT facebook-domain-verification=vv293wwgf3o64wo3ivm7tsmx1ap15q 243
TXT google-site-verification=aXJkUV6DRRfew15x2HyVJLZx072UZ39DGOTRFijYsqc 243
MX clio-me.mail.protection.outlook.com 3543
SOA 843
Mname ns-596.awsdns-10.net
Rname awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
A 99.84.160.102 1
A 99.84.160.127 1
A 99.84.160.75 1
A 99.84.160.122 1
NS ns-1932.awsdns-49.co.uk 3541
NS ns-501.awsdns-62.com 3541
NS ns-596.awsdns-10.net 3541
NS ns-1388.awsdns-45.org 3541

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on October 11, 2018 and will expire on October 11, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar EuroDNS S.A.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on August 2, 2020.
Domain Created:
2018-10-11
Domain Expires:
2025-10-11
Domain Updated:
2020-08-02
Domain Age:
6 years 9 months 7 days
Domain Registrar:
EuroDNS S.A.
Domain Owner:
LINDHARDT OG RINGHOF FORLAG A/S
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: CLIO.ME
Registry Domain ID: D425500000062584121-AGRS
Registrar WHOIS Server:
Registrar URL: http://www.eurodns.com
Updated Date: 2020-08-02T23:45:09Z
Creation Date: 2018-10-11T11:49:11Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-10-11T11:49:11Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: EuroDNS S.A.
Registrar IANA ID: 1052
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +352.27220150
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registrant Organization: LINDHARDT OG RINGHOF FORLAG A/S
Registrant State/Province:
Registrant Country: DK
Name Server: NS-1388.AWSDNS-45.ORG
Name Server: NS-1932.AWSDNS-49.CO.UK
Name Server: NS-596.AWSDNS-10.NET
Name Server: NS-501.AWSDNS-62.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2022-12-02T05:18:00Z