bitcointalk.org Bitcointalk.org

   
Bitcoin Forum - Index

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Bitcointalk.org?

• Bitcointalk.org ranks #84,087 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Bitcointalk.org?

• 0.0010747% of global Internet users visit Bitcointalk.org

How many people visit Bitcointalk.org each day?

• Bitcointalk.org receives approximately 53K visitors and 164,776 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Bitcointalk.org receive most of its visitors from?

• Bitcointalk.org is mostly visited by people located in United States,Germany,Russian Federation.

How much Bitcointalk.org can earn?

• Bitcointalk.org should earn about $630.76/day from advertising revenue.

What is Bitcointalk.org estimated value?

• Estimated value of Bitcointalk.org is $687,383.96.

What IP addresses does Bitcointalk.org resolve to?

• Bitcointalk.org resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:10::ac43:22bf, 104.20.37.133.

Where are Bitcointalk.org servers located in?

• Bitcointalk.org has servers located in Ashburn, VA, 20149, United States.

bitcointalk.org Profile

Title:Bitcoin Forum - Index Description:Bitcoin Forum - Index
Tags:
post
bitcointalk
bitcoin forum
smf
asic
mining
topics
forum
bitcoin
posts
india
today
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Social Media Networks
About: The main Bitcoin discussion forum, includes subforums for technical support, mining, development and economics.
Bitcoin Forum - Index Edit Site Info

What technologies does bitcointalk.org use?

These are the technologies used at bitcointalk.org. bitcointalk.org has a total of 2 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Security
HSTS HSTS

bitcointalk.org Traffic Analysis

Bitcointalk.org is ranked #84,087 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 53K visitors daily, generating a total of 164.8K pageviews. This equates to about 1.6M monthly visitors. Bitcointalk.org traffic has increased by 1.46% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors53K
3.38%
Monthly Visits1.6M
1.46%
Pages per Visit3.11
7.36%
Visit duration02:49
0.84%
Bounce Rate54.25%
3.5%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
52,983
Monthly Visits:
1,605,385
Pages per Visit:
3.11
Daily Pageviews:
164,776
Avg. visit duration:
02:49
Bounce rate:
54.25%
Global Reach:
0.0010747%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
1,573,738
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
892,437
HypeRank:
84,087
SEMrush Rank:
107,029
SimilarWeb Rank:
58,276
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
63.39%
Referral:
10.76%
Search:
24.02%
Social:
1.64%
Paid:
0.20%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
62.85%
Mobile:
37.15%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

695.8K
OCT
1.6M
NOV
1.6M
DEC

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 29.09%
 
Germany 5.86%
 
Russian Federation 4.32%
 
United Kingdom 3.54%
 
Korea, Republic of 3.02%

Where do visitors go on bitcointalk.org?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
bitcointalk.org
100.00%99.92%1.3
OTHER
0%0.08%0

Which sites are competitors to bitcointalk.org?

Websites similar to bitcointalk.org are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 81 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with bitcointalk.org in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1,070,000
Bing Index:
3,170,000

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  bitcointalk.org
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  107,029
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  32,435
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  18,464
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $55,505.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $630.8 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $18.9K and annual gross revenue of approximately $230.2K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $687.4K.

How much would bitcointalk.org make?

Daily Revenue:
$630.76
Monthly Revenue:
$18,922.80
Yearly Revenue:
$230,227.40
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 47,927$231.49
 
United Kingdom 5,833$15.63
 
Germany 9,663$13.53
 
Korea, Republic of 4,974$2.98
 
Russian Federation 7,111$2.92

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$48.39
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$1,451.60
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$17,661.09
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
12,988
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
389,641
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
4,740,637

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 8,627$41.67
 
Germany 2,802$3.92
 
United Kingdom 933$2.50
 
Russian Federation 427$0.17
 
Korea, Republic of 199$0.12

How much is bitcointalk.org worth?

Website Value:
$687.4K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
bitcointalk.org
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2018-03-06 16:05:59
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Passing

Desktop summary

Root domain:
bitcointalk.org
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
bitcointalk.org
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2018-03-06 16:05:59
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Passing

Where is bitcointalk.org hosted? ▼

Bitcointalk.org may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:10::ac43:22bf, 104.20.37.133
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:
Ashburn
VA
20149
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 104.20.37.133

How fast does bitcointalk.org load? ▼

The average loading time of bitcointalk.org is 222 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
222 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 55% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 55% 37% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 37% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 70% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)14ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 90% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)782ms 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 75% 19% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)19ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Time to Interactive 0.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 0.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 100 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Total Blocking Time 40 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 92% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 55% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 52% 37% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 37% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 11% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)322ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6% 93% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 93% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 91% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 64% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 64% 27% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)301ms 12% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 12% 85% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 85% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Speed Index 1.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Largest Contentful Paint 1.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 1.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Time to Interactive 1.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors

Does bitcointalk.org use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on bitcointalk.org are reduced by 82%.
bitcointalk.org use gzip compression.
Original size: 90.53 KB
Compressed size: 15.93 KB
File reduced by: 74.6 KB (82%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. bitcointalk.org has 90 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  90
Safety Confidence:
  42
Child Safety Reputations:
  89
Child Safety Confidence:
  40

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. bitcointalk.org supports HTTPS.
 bitcointalk.org supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: bitcointalk.org
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Mar 19 10:16:05 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 17 11:15:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 bitcointalk.org supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Site Categories ▼

Website categories are used to classify websites based on their content or purpose. These categories provide a way to organize and filter websites, allowing users to find relevant information or ensure compliance with specific regulations or policies.
Bitcoin/FAQs

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:13:41 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
x-frame-options: DENY
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
x-content-type-options: nosniff
strict-transport-security: max-age=2592000
set-cookie: sessionid=l9v3hlk7mgrctoq8dm5re2d07utl4f1t; path=/; secure; HttpOnly
cache-control: private
expires: Mon, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT
last-modified: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:13:41 GMT
content-encoding: gzip
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
vary: accept-encoding
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 933edb550d67104d-ORD

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:10::6814:2485 295
AAAA 2606:4700:10::6814:2585 295
AAAA 2606:4700:10::ac43:22bf 295
A 172.67.34.191 295
A 104.20.36.133 295
A 104.20.37.133 295
NS brad.ns.cloudflare.com 3595
NS amy.ns.cloudflare.com 3595
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on June 24, 2011 and will expire on June 24, 2029 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar NameCheap, Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on November 24, 2019.
Domain Created:
2011-06-24
Domain Expires:
2029-06-24
Domain Updated:
2019-11-24
Domain Age:
14 years 18 days
Domain Registrar:
NameCheap, Inc.
Domain Owner:
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy e
WhoIs:
 

Domain name: bitcointalk.org
Registry Domain ID: e251d3a651ed47d2abc64c3bc4e501c1-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL: http://www.namecheap.com
Updated Date: 2019-11-24T14:01:10.58Z
Creation Date: 2011-06-24T05:19:00.45Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2029-06-24T05:19:00.45Z
Registrar: NAMECHEAP INC
Registrar IANA ID: 1068
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.9854014545
Reseller: NAMECHEAP INC
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 
Registrant Name: Redacted for Privacy
Registrant Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Registrant Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Registrant City: Reykjavik
Registrant State/Province: Capital Region
Registrant Postal Code: 101
Registrant Country: IS
Registrant Phone: +354.4212434
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID: 
Admin Name: Redacted for Privacy
Admin Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Admin Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Admin City: Reykjavik
Admin State/Province: Capital Region
Admin Postal Code: 101
Admin Country: IS
Admin Phone: +354.4212434
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID: 
Tech Name: Redacted for Privacy
Tech Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Tech Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2 
Tech City: Reykjavik
Tech State/Province: Capital Region
Tech Postal Code: 101
Tech Country: IS
Tech Phone: +354.4212434
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email
Name Server: amy.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: brad.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-06T14:16:54.36Z