Actygo.com
無効なURLです
Domain Summary
What percent of global Internet users visit Actygo.com?
• 3.0E-6% of global Internet users visit Actygo.com
How many people visit Actygo.com each day?
• Actygo.com receives approximately 149 visitors and 535 page impressions per day.
Which countries does Actygo.com receive most of its visitors from?
• Actygo.com is mostly visited by people located in Japan.
How much Actygo.com can earn?
• Actygo.com should earn about $0.19/day from advertising revenue.
What is Actygo.com estimated value?
• Estimated value of Actygo.com is $191.50.
What IP addresses does Actygo.com resolve to?
• Actygo.com resolves to the IP addresses 183.90.232.22.
Where are Actygo.com servers located in?
• Actygo.com has servers located in Japan.
actygo.com Profile
Title:無効なURLです
What technologies does actygo.com use?
These are the technologies used at actygo.com. actygo.com has a total of 9 technologies installed in 9 different categories.actygo.com Traffic Analysis
This website is viewed by an estimated 149 visitors daily, generating a total of 535 pageviews. This equates to about 4.5K monthly visitors.Daily Visitors149
Monthly Visits4.5K
Pages per Visit3.60
Visit duration00:54
Bounce Rate37.88%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
- Daily Unique Visitors:
- 149
- Monthly Visits:
- 4,515
- Pages per Visit:
- 3.60
- Daily Pageviews:
- 535
- Avg. visit duration:
- 00:54
- Bounce rate:
- 37.88%
- Global Reach:
- 3.0E-6%
- Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
- 4,547
- HypeRank:
- n/a
- SimilarWeb Rank:
- 3,112,792
Total Visits Last 3 Months
1.5K
JAN
4.5K
FEB
4.5K
MAR
Visitors by country
- Country
- Users%
- Japan 100.00%
Backlinks Report ▼
Actygo.com has a total of 162 backlinks from 139 referring domains and most of them comes from United States.- Total Backlinks:
- 162
- Follow Links:
- n/a
- Nofollow Links:
- n/a
- Referring Domains:
- 139
- Referring IPs:
- 136
- Authority Domain Score:
- 17
Backlinks by country
- Country
- Domains
- United States 33
- India 8
- Germany 7
- Romania 6
- United Kingdom 6
Backlinks by TLDs
- TLD Distribution
- Domains
- .com
- 62
- .info
- 7
- .in
- 5
- .edu
- 0
- .gov
- 0
Last update was 202 days ago
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with actygo.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.
Search Engine Indexes ▼
Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.- Google Index:
- 125
▼
SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.- Domain:
- actygo.com
- Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic) - n/a
- Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP) - 0
- Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results) - 0
- Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords) - $0.00
Revenue report ▼
Google.com would generate approximately $0.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $5.7 and annual gross revenue of approximately $69.4. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $191.5.How much would actygo.com make?
- Daily Revenue:
- $0.19
- Monthly Revenue:
- $5.70
- Yearly Revenue:
- $69.35
Daily earning by country
- CountryPageviewsEarning
- Japan 535$0.19
Loss of money due to Adblock?
- Daily Revenue Loss:
- $0.01
- Monthly Revenue Loss:
- $0.17
- Yearly Revenue Loss:
- $2.11
- Daily Pageviews Blocked:
- 16
- Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
- 482
- Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
- 5,858
Daily revenue loss by country
- CountryBlockedLost Money
- Japan 16$0.01
How much is actygo.com worth?
- Website Value:
- $191.5
Ad Experience Report ▼
Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.Mobile summary
- Root domain:
- actygo.com
- Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.) - Not reviewed
Desktop summary
- Root domain:
- actygo.com
- Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.) - Not reviewed
Abusive Experience Report ▼
Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.- Root domain:
- actygo.com
- Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.) - Not reviewed
Where is actygo.com hosted? ▼
Actygo.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.- Server IP:
- 183.90.232.22
- ASN:
- AS131965
- ISP:
- Xserver Inc.
- Server Location:
Japan, JP
Other sites hosted on 183.90.232.22
How fast does actygo.com load? ▼
The average loading time of actygo.com is 487 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.- Average Load Time:
- 487 ms
Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop
Field Data
Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Origin Data
All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Lab Data
INP by phase
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
LCP request discovery
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Third parties
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
CSS Selector costs
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 0.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Minimize third-party usage
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Render blocking requests
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Font display
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Forced reflow
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Meaningful Paint
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Improve image delivery
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Time to Interactive 0.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile
Field Data
Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Origin Data
All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Lab Data
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
CSS Selector costs
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Forced reflow
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
LCP request discovery
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Meaningful Paint
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Render blocking requests
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
INP by phase
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Third parties
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Speed Index 1.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Improve image delivery
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Minimize third-party usage
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Does actygo.com use compression? ▼
Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on actygo.com are reduced by %.
actygo.com does not use compression.
Original size: 678 B
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)
Google Safe Browsing ▼
Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼
An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. actygo.com supports HTTPS. actygo.com supports HTTPS
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.xserver.jp
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: CloudSecure RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA 2
Valid from: Apr 5 00:00:00 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 6 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: CloudSecure RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA 2
Valid from: Apr 5 00:00:00 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 6 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: CloudSecure RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA 2
Organization: CloudSecure Corporation
Location: JP
Issuer: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Valid from: Jan 31 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Jan 30 23:59:59 2034 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 3072 Bits
Organization: CloudSecure Corporation
Location: JP
Issuer: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Valid from: Jan 31 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Jan 30 23:59:59 2034 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 3072 Bits
Common Name: USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
Organization: The USERTRUST Network
Location: Jersey City, New Jersey, US
Issuer: AAA Certificate Services
Valid from: Mar 12 00:00:00 2019 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 23:59:59 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Organization: The USERTRUST Network
Location: Jersey City, New Jersey, US
Issuer: AAA Certificate Services
Valid from: Mar 12 00:00:00 2019 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 23:59:59 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼
HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency. actygo.com supports HTTP/2
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...
Http Header ▼
HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.server: nginx
date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:08:44 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-length: 678
last-modified: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 04:38:04 GMT
etag: "2a6-57a7044560559"
accept-ranges: bytes
DNS Lookup ▼
DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.| Type | Ip | Target/Txt | TTL |
| TXT | 3600 | ||
| MX | 86400 | ||
| SOA | 86400 | ||
| Mname | ns1.xserver.jp | ||
| Rname | root.xserver.jp | ||
| Serial Number | 0 | ||
| Refresh | 10800 | ||
| Retry | 3600 | ||
| Expire | 604800 | ||
| Minimum TTL | 3600 | ||
| A | 183.90.232.22 | 86351 | |
| NS | 86400 | ||
| NS | 86400 | ||
| NS | 86400 | ||
| NS | 86400 | ||
| NS | 86400 |
Whois Lookup ▼
Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on April 26, 2018 and will expire on April 26, 2027 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar GMO Internet, Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on March 22, 2025.- Domain Created:
- 2018-04-26
- Domain Expires:
- 2027-04-26
- Domain Updated:
- 2025-03-22
- Domain Age:
- 7 years 6 months 14 days
- Domain Registrar:
- GMO Internet, Inc.
- Domain Owner:
- RYOTA AKIBA
- WhoIs:
Domain Name: actygo.com Registry Domain ID: 2256983385_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.discount-domain.com Registrar URL: http://www.onamae.com Updated Date: 2025-03-22T12:59:49Z Creation Date: 2018-04-26T05:07:13Z Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2027-04-26T05:07:12Z Registrar: GMO Internet, Inc. Registrar IANA ID: 49 Registrar Abuse Contact Email:Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +81.337709199 Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok Registry Registrant ID: Not Available From Registry Registrant Name: RYOTA AKIBA Registrant Organization: RYOTA AKIBA Registrant Street: 7-66-318 Hishinumakaigan Registrant Street: 318 Registrant City: Chigasakishi Registrant State/Province: Kanagawa Registrant Postal Code: 253-0037 Registrant Country: JP Registrant Phone: +81.8033030383 Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email:
Registry Admin ID: Not Available From Registry Admin Name: RYOTA AKIBA Admin Organization: APLUS Inc. Admin Street: 7-66-318 Hishinumakaigan Admin Street: 318 Admin City: Chigasakishi Admin State/Province: Kanagawa Admin Postal Code: 253-0037 Admin Country: JP Admin Phone: +81.8033030383 Admin Phone Ext: Admin Fax: Admin Fax Ext: Admin Email:
Registry Tech ID: Not Available From Registry Tech Name: RYOTA AKIBA Tech Organization: APLUS Inc. Tech Street: 7-66-318 Hishinumakaigan Tech Street: 318 Tech City: Chigasakishi Tech State/Province: Kanagawa Tech Postal Code: 253-0037 Tech Country: JP Tech Phone: +81.8033030383 Tech Phone Ext: Tech Fax: Tech Fax Ext: Tech Email:
Name Server: ns1.xserver.jp Name Server: ns2.xserver.jp Name Server: ns3.xserver.jp Name Server: ns4.xserver.jp Name Server: ns5.xserver.jp DNSSEC: unsigned URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/ >>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-22T12:59:49Z