wafdo.com Wafdo.com

   
Wafdo change de nom et devient sodirm.com

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Wafdo.com?

• 3.91E-5% of global Internet users visit Wafdo.com

How many people visit Wafdo.com each day?

• Wafdo.com receives approximately 1.9K visitors and 7,703 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Wafdo.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Wafdo.com is mostly visited by people located in France,Belgium.

How much Wafdo.com can earn?

• Wafdo.com should earn about $4.47/day from advertising revenue.

What is Wafdo.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Wafdo.com is $4,296.96.

What IP addresses does Wafdo.com resolve to?

• Wafdo.com resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3033::6815:2c38, 172.67.195.219.

Where are Wafdo.com servers located in?

• Wafdo.com has servers located in United States.

wafdo.com Profile

Title:wafdo change de nom et devient sodirm.com Description:wafdo a changer de nom, il devient dorénavant sodirm.com
Category:Arts and Entertainment / Streaming & Online TV
Edit Site Info

What technologies does wafdo.com use?

These are the technologies used at wafdo.com. wafdo.com has a total of 7 technologies installed in 4 different categories.
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
cdnjs cdnjs
Google Hosted Libraries Google Hosted Libraries
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
jQuery UI jQuery UI
Programming Languages
PHP PHP

wafdo.com Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 1.9K visitors daily, generating a total of 7.7K pageviews. This equates to about 58.4K monthly visitors. Wafdo.com traffic has decreased by 78.01% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1.9K
18.61%
Monthly Visits58.4K
78.01%
Pages per Visit3.99
46.43%
Visit duration04:06
32.28%
Bounce Rate43.83%
72.4%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,929
Monthly Visits:
58,449
Pages per Visit:
3.99
Daily Pageviews:
7,703
Avg. visit duration:
04:06
Bounce rate:
43.83%
Global Reach:
3.91E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
110,092
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
40,006
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
59,053
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
25,702,489
SimilarWeb Rank:
444,890
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
77.02%
Referral:
2.13%
Search:
13.46%
Social:
7.38%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
33.72%
Mobile:
66.28%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

119.3K
DEC
265.8K
JAN
58.4K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
France 99.84%
 
Belgium 0.16%

Which sites are competitors to wafdo.com?

Websites similar to wafdo.com are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 92 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with wafdo.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  wafdo.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  25,702,489
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  2
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $4.5 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $134.1 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.6K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $4.3K.

How much would wafdo.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$4.47
Monthly Revenue:
$134.10
Yearly Revenue:
$1,631.55
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
France 7,691$4.46
 
Belgium 12$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.49
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$14.74
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$179.39
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
847
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
25,424
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
309,320

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
France 846$0.49
 
Belgium 1$0.00

How much is wafdo.com worth?

Website Value:
$4.3K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
wafdo.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
wafdo.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
wafdo.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is wafdo.com hosted? ▼

Wafdo.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.

How fast does wafdo.com load? ▼

The average loading time of wafdo.com is 26 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 91.
Average Load Time:
26 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)516ms 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 82% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)589ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)11ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)586ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)405ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 84% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)596ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)13ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)620ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 0.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Time to Interactive 0.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Speed Index 0.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

91
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)540ms 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 84% 9% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)314ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 93% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 93% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)507ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 85% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)313ms 7% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7% 90% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 90% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Contentful Paint 2.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 4.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Time to Interactive 2.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Largest Contentful Paint 2.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs

Does wafdo.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on wafdo.com are reduced by 67%.
wafdo.com use br compression.
Original size: 4.74 KB
Compressed size: 1.56 KB
File reduced by: 3.19 KB (67%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. wafdo.com supports HTTPS.
 wafdo.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: wafdo.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Jan 25 02:27:18 2025 GMT
Valid until: Apr 25 03:24:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 wafdo.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:15:02 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
x-powered-by: PHP/7.4.33
access-control-allow-origin: *
last-modified: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 17:26:10 GMT
cache-control: max-age=14400
cf-cache-status: HIT
age: 22935
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=yfyekJiieWg4AghsHcC4aYHsEHJNvIdx3pnZlkJGFlmIaweSq5i4Q0FCwAsAIwQgWTy%2FViOR2xiXu7W%2BlnCII3JKw3Sm6NskU1LCus%2Bvv7fOP5rmXAfJyfqiBKI%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
vary: Accept-Encoding
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 9212cce5b91261e0-ORD
content-encoding: br
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=1578&min_rtt=1460&rtt_var=493&sent=7&recv=10&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3404&recv_bytes=890&delivery_rate=1983561&cwnd=33&unsent_bytes=0&cid=f041692514a6cfca&ts=21&x=0"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3037::ac43:c3db 245
AAAA 2606:4700:3033::6815:2c38 245
A 104.21.44.56 245
A 172.67.195.219 245
NS quentin.ns.cloudflare.com 172745
NS iris.ns.cloudflare.com 172745
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on October 9, 2023 and will expire on October 9, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Name.com, Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on October 10, 2024.
Domain Created:
2023-10-09
Domain Expires:
2025-10-09
Domain Updated:
2024-10-10
Domain Age:
1 years 8 months 7 days
Domain Registrar:
Name.com, Inc.
Domain Owner:
Domain Protection Services, Inc.
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: WAFDO.COM 
Registry Domain ID: 2820556193_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN 
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.name.com 
Registrar URL: http://www.name.com 
Updated Date: 2024-10-10T07:34:13Z 
Creation Date: 2023-10-09T18:24:39Z 
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-10-09T18:24:39Z 
Registrar: Name.com, Inc. 
Registrar IANA ID: 625 
Reseller:  
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited 
Registry Registrant ID: Not Available From Registry 
Registrant Name: Redacted For Privacy 
Registrant Organization: Domain Protection Services, Inc. 
Registrant Street: PO Box 1769  
Registrant City: Denver 
Registrant State/Province: CO 
Registrant Postal Code: 80201 
Registrant Country: US 
Registrant Phone: +1.7208009072 
Registrant Fax: +1.7209758725 
Registrant Email: https://www.name.com/contact-domain-whois/wafdo.com 
Registry Admin ID: Not Available From Registry 
Admin Name: Redacted For Privacy 
Admin Organization: Domain Protection Services, Inc. 
Admin Street: PO Box 1769  
Admin City: Denver 
Admin State/Province: CO 
Admin Postal Code: 80201 
Admin Country: US 
Admin Phone: +1.7208009072 
Admin Fax: +1.7209758725 
Admin Email: https://www.name.com/contact-domain-whois/wafdo.com 
Registry Tech ID: Not Available From Registry 
Tech Name: Redacted For Privacy 
Tech Organization: Domain Protection Services, Inc. 
Tech Street: PO Box 1769  
Tech City: Denver 
Tech State/Province: CO 
Tech Postal Code: 80201 
Tech Country: US 
Tech Phone: +1.7208009072 
Tech Fax: +1.7209758725 
Tech Email: https://www.name.com/contact-domain-whois/wafdo.com 
Name Server: iris.ns.cloudflare.com 
Name Server: quentin.ns.cloudflare.com 
DNSSEC: unSigned 
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email 
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.7203101849 
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-16T08:15:56Z