vates.tech Vates.tech

   
Open Virtualization Platform - VM infrastructure made simple

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Vates.tech?

• 9.7E-6% of global Internet users visit Vates.tech

How many people visit Vates.tech each day?

• Vates.tech receives approximately 476 visitors and 804 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Vates.tech receive most of its visitors from?

• Vates.tech is mostly visited by people located in United States,Australia,France.

How much Vates.tech can earn?

• Vates.tech should earn about $3.09/day from advertising revenue.

What is Vates.tech estimated value?

• Estimated value of Vates.tech is $2,888.94.

What IP addresses does Vates.tech resolve to?

• Vates.tech resolves to the IP addresses 2a01:240:ab08:2::9, 37.26.189.199.

Where are Vates.tech servers located in?

• Vates.tech has servers located in Pantin, Seine-Saint-Denis, 93500, France.

vates.tech Profile

Title:Open Virtualization Platform - VM infrastructure made simple
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Programming and Developer Software
Edit Site Info

What technologies does vates.tech use?

These are the technologies used at vates.tech. vates.tech has a total of 4 technologies installed in 5 different categories.
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
CDN
jQuery CDN jQuery CDN
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
Miscellaneous
PWA PWA

vates.tech Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 476 visitors daily, generating a total of 804 pageviews. This equates to about 14.4K monthly visitors. Vates.tech traffic has decreased by 25.63% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors476
45.08%
Monthly Visits14.4K
25.63%
Pages per Visit1.69
32.89%
Visit duration00:49
0.4%
Bounce Rate49.69%
5.71%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
476
Monthly Visits:
14,423
Pages per Visit:
1.69
Daily Pageviews:
804
Avg. visit duration:
00:49
Bounce rate:
49.69%
Global Reach:
9.7E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
4,063
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
2,591
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
14,435
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
1,989,539
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,760,896
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
42.78%
Referral:
27.30%
Search:
24.37%
Social:
5.55%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

22.5K
DEC
19.4K
JAN
14.4K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 43.77%
 
Australia 9.99%
 
France 8.70%
 
India 5.33%
 
Germany 5.06%

Which sites are competitors to vates.tech?

Websites similar to vates.tech are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 92 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with vates.tech in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
607

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  vates.tech
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  1,989,539
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  117
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  349
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $316.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $3.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $92.7 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.1K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $2.9K.

How much would vates.tech make?

Daily Revenue:
$3.09
Monthly Revenue:
$92.70
Yearly Revenue:
$1,127.85
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 352$1.70
 
Australia 80$0.39
 
Germany 41$0.06
 
France 70$0.04
 
India 43$0.02

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.41
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$12.27
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$149.25
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
111
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
3,326
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
40,472

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 63$0.31
 
Australia 16$0.08
 
Germany 12$0.02
 
India 12$0.00
 
France 8$0.00

How much is vates.tech worth?

Website Value:
$2.9K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
vates.tech
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
vates.tech
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
vates.tech
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is vates.tech hosted? ▼

Vates.tech may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2a01:240:ab08:2::9, 37.26.189.199
ASN:
AS30781 
ISP:
Jaguar Network SAS 
Server Location:
Pantin
Seine-Saint-Denis, 93
93500
France, FR
 

Other sites hosted on 37.26.189.199

How fast does vates.tech load? ▼

The average loading time of vates.tech is 328 ms. The Desktop speed index is 95 and mobile speed index is 75.
Average Load Time:
328 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

95
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)7ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)603ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 81% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)54ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.1s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 67% 21% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)4ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)434ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 88% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)44ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Speed Index 1.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 2.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

75
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)662ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 82% 13% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)200ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 74% 16% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 16% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 8%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.9s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 68% 22% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 22% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)614ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)170ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 79% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 13% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.6s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 74% 18% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 18% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Contentful Paint 1.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 4.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Time to Interactive 9.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 40 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 90 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 5.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Does vates.tech use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on vates.tech are reduced by 72%.
vates.tech use gzip compression.
Original size: 37.8 KB
Compressed size: 10.39 KB
File reduced by: 27.41 KB (72%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. vates.tech supports HTTPS.
 vates.tech supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: vates.tech
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Feb 23 03:39:55 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 24 03:39:54 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 vates.tech supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: nginx/1.22.1
date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 05:38:22 GMT
content-type: text/html
last-modified: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 09:33:55 GMT
etag: W/"67d15503-9738"
content-encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 86400
Mname ns1.gandi.net
Rname hostmaster.gandi.net
Serial Number 1742428800
Refresh 10800
Retry 3600
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 10800
TXT mandrill_verify.6UlEEtD4RF0LmL9pE_Obcg 300
TXT MS=ms75017374 300
TXT google-site-verification=BqJ8_6f-YYweTYFPAb_60Y2TxDed0XIB9pSIuyKvnAw 300
TXT v=spf1 include:spf.mandrillapp.com ?all 300
MX mail2.vates.fr 600
AAAA 2a01:240:ab08:2::9 299
A 37.26.189.199 299
NS ns-22-b.gandi.net 3299
NS ns-175-c.gandi.net 3299
NS ns-26-a.gandi.net 3299

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on April 29, 2022 and will expire on April 29, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Gandi SAS. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on June 10, 2024.
Domain Created:
2022-04-29
Domain Expires:
2025-04-29
Domain Updated:
2024-06-10
Domain Age:
3 years 1 months 21 days
Domain Registrar:
Gandi SAS
Domain Owner:
Vates
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: VATES.TECH
Registry Domain ID: D294526334-CNIC
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.gandi.net
Registrar URL: http://www.gandi.net/
Updated Date: 2024-06-10T14:30:05.0Z
Creation Date: 2022-04-29T09:12:53.0Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-04-29T23:59:59.0Z
Registrar: Gandi SAS
Registrar IANA ID: 81
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registrant Organization: Vates
Registrant State/Province: 84
Registrant Country: FR
Registrant Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Admin Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Tech Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Name Server: NS-26-A.GANDI.NET
Name Server: NS-22-B.GANDI.NET
Name Server: NS-175-C.GANDI.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
Billing Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +33.170377661
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-20T05:39:22.0Z > IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE DEPLOYMENT OF RDAP: please visit
https://www.centralnicregistry.com/support/information/rdap