uloz.to Uloz.to

   
Ulož.to Disk - The Personal Backup Service

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Uloz.to?

• Uloz.to ranks #130,213 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Uloz.to?

• 0.0001511% of global Internet users visit Uloz.to

How many people visit Uloz.to each day?

• Uloz.to receives approximately 7.4K visitors and 32,302 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Uloz.to receive most of its visitors from?

• Uloz.to is mostly visited by people located in Czech Republic,Slovakia,United States.

How much Uloz.to can earn?

• Uloz.to should earn about $36.00/day from advertising revenue.

What is Uloz.to estimated value?

• Estimated value of Uloz.to is $35,242.54.

What IP addresses does Uloz.to resolve to?

• Uloz.to resolves to the IP addresses 104.26.13.232.

Where are Uloz.to servers located in?

• Uloz.to has servers located in Jesenice, Okres Praha-zapad, 252 42, United States.

uloz.to Profile

Title:Ulož.to Disk - The Personal Backup Service Description:ulož.to je československou jedničkou pro svobodné sdílení souborů. nahrávejte, sdílejte a stahujte zdarma. kredit umožní i stahování neomezenou rychlostí.
Tags:
live
download
internet
z internet explorer
sharing
rapidshare
upload
ostatni
stahovani
storage
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Other Computers Electronics and Technology
About: Ulož.to je v Čechách a na Slovensku jedničkou pro svobodné sdílení souborů. Nahrávej, sdílej a stahuj zdarma. Kredit umožní i stahování neomezenou rychlostí. Edit Site Info

What technologies does uloz.to use?

These are the technologies used at uloz.to. uloz.to has a total of 10 technologies installed in 9 different categories.
Ecommerce
Cart Functionality Cart Functionality
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Analytics
Cloudflare Browser Insights Cloudflare Browser Insights
RUM
Cloudflare Browser Insights Cloudflare Browser Insights
Tag Managers
Google Tag Manager Google Tag Manager
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Open Graph Open Graph
PWA PWA
JavaScript Libraries
Modernizr Modernizr
Web Frameworks
Nette Framework Nette Framework
Programming Languages
PHP PHP

uloz.to Traffic Analysis

Uloz.to is ranked #130,213 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 7.4K visitors daily, generating a total of 32.3K pageviews. This equates to about 225.7K monthly visitors. Uloz.to traffic has increased by 38.85% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors7.4K
16.2%
Monthly Visits225.7K
38.85%
Pages per Visit4.34
1.18%
Visit duration01:30
33.51%
Bounce Rate41.91%
20.88%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
7,449
Monthly Visits:
225,705
Pages per Visit:
4.34
Daily Pageviews:
32,302
Avg. visit duration:
01:30
Bounce rate:
41.91%
Global Reach:
0.0001511%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
324,179
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
208,267
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
228,026
HypeRank:
130,213
SEMrush Rank:
2,834,680
SimilarWeb Rank:
150,401
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
63.15%
Referral:
9.72%
Search:
21.62%
Social:
5.45%
Paid:
0.07%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
44.68%
Mobile:
55.32%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

203.4K
JUN
162.6K
JUL
225.7K
AUG

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Czech Republic 62.45%
 
Slovakia 11.75%
 
United States 5.33%
 
Poland 4.65%
 
Brazil 4.50%

Where do visitors go on uloz.to?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
uloz.to
84.00%75.37%3.4
download.uloz.to
7.47%3.77%1.9
content-provider40.uloz.to
3.97%1.40%1.3
content-provider42.uloz.to
3.29%0.95%1.1
content-provider43.uloz.to
3.19%1.29%1.5

Which sites are competitors to uloz.to?

Websites similar to uloz.to are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Domain
CompareDaily Visitors
1337x.to
Compare >1.3M
chomikuj.pl
Compare >204.3K
zive.cz
Compare >168.7K
cnews.cz
Compare >10.6K
edisk.cz
Compare >2.6K
Last update was 34 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with uloz.to in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
77,000
Bing Index:
14,200

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  uloz.to
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  2,834,680
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  24
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  179
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $14.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $36 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $1.1K and annual gross revenue of approximately $13.1K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $35.2K.

How much would uloz.to make?

Daily Revenue:
$36.00
Monthly Revenue:
$1,080.00
Yearly Revenue:
$13,140.00
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Czech Republic 20,173$9.28
 
United States 1,722$8.32
 
Brazil 1,452$1.93
 
Slovakia 3,796$0.95
 
Poland 1,502$0.60

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$2.82
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$84.73
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$1,030.89
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
3,252
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
97,545
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
1,186,803

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 310$1.50
 
Czech Republic 2,017$0.93
 
Poland 496$0.20
 
Brazil 87$0.12
 
Slovakia 342$0.09

How much is uloz.to worth?

Website Value:
$35.2K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
uloz.to
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2018-03-06 16:06:45
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Passing

Desktop summary

Root domain:
uloz.to
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2018-03-06 16:06:45
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Passing

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
uloz.to
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2018-03-06 16:06:45
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Passing

Where is uloz.to hosted? ▼

Uloz.to may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
104.26.13.232
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:
Jesenice
Okres Praha-zapad, 20A
252 42
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 104.26.13.232

How fast does uloz.to load? ▼

The average loading time of uloz.to is 144 ms. The Desktop speed index is 97 and mobile speed index is 67.
Average Load Time:
144 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

97
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 87% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)411ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)995ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)34ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 87% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 86% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 11% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)518ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 80% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.0s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)72ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 84% 9% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint 1.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 0.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Contentful Paint 0.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Total Blocking Time 110 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 150 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 1.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
INP breakdown  
Start investigating with the longest subpart. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

67
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 92% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)431ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 9% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.0s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)121ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 92% 6% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)408ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)891ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)156ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 83% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 13% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 6.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Total Blocking Time 80 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 140 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 6.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Contentful Paint 3.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP breakdown  
Start investigating with the longest subpart. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Speed Index 4.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Does uloz.to use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on uloz.to are reduced by 73%.
uloz.to use br compression.
Original size: 23.85 KB
Compressed size: 6.25 KB
File reduced by: 17.6 KB (73%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. uloz.to has 88 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  88
Safety Confidence:
  44
Child Safety Reputations:
  68
Child Safety Confidence:
  28

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. uloz.to supports HTTPS.
 uloz.to supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: uloz.to
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Aug 13 03:52:22 2025 GMT
Valid until: Nov 11 04:50:45 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 uloz.to supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Site Categories ▼

Website categories are used to classify websites based on their content or purpose. These categories provide a way to organize and filter websites, allowing users to find relevant information or ensure compliance with specific regulations or policies.
Webové aplikace/Úložiště dat

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 13:49:18 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
server: cloudflare
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
nel: {"report_to":"cf-nel","success_fraction":0.0,"max_age":604800}
vary: X-Requested-With
vary: accept-encoding
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
pragma: no-cache
x-node-name: ulozto8
report-to: {"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800,"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=qyZ9EmzXaHdqwAFaVJUNu9vxKlsr1nCrw%2FkR9behgYPDdAG%2B3A%2FToJeYgiPOvWlY7fV2iHknNquh8LRepk1vPlYUWOfUNOY%3D"}]}
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
content-encoding: br
set-cookie: _nss=1; HttpOnly; SameSite=Strict; Secure; Path=/
set-cookie: ULOSESSID=tec13lvouou8r5fb15boupgh6f; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax; Secure; Path=/
set-cookie: uloztoid=331371274; SameSite=None; Secure; Path=/; Domain=uloz.to; Max-Age=31536000; Expires=Mon, 28 Sep 2026 13:49:18 GMT
cf-ray: 9863b40e0ac03410-FRA
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 104.26.12.232 254
A 172.67.71.223 254
A 104.26.13.232 254

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.
WhoIs:
 

Tonic whoisd V1.1
uloz bella.ns.cloudflare.com
uloz santino.ns.cloudflare.com