technologyreview.com Technologyreview.com

   
MIT Technology Review

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Technologyreview.com?

• Technologyreview.com ranks #128,085 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Technologyreview.com?

• 0.0016052% of global Internet users visit Technologyreview.com

How many people visit Technologyreview.com each day?

• Technologyreview.com receives approximately 79.1K visitors and 140,942 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Technologyreview.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Technologyreview.com is mostly visited by people located in United States,United Kingdom,Canada.

How much Technologyreview.com can earn?

• Technologyreview.com should earn about $587.56/day from advertising revenue.

What is Technologyreview.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Technologyreview.com is $614,841.76.

What IP addresses does Technologyreview.com resolve to?

• Technologyreview.com resolves to the IP addresses 192.0.66.184.

Where are Technologyreview.com servers located in?

• Technologyreview.com has servers located in San Francisco, California, 94110, United States.

technologyreview.com Profile

Title:MIT Technology Review
Description:Emerging technology news & insights | AI, Climate Change, BioTech, and more
Tags:
news
tech blogs
technology news
it news
tech
tech reviews
magazine
science
technology
mit
Category:News and Media / News and Media
About: MIT's magazine about innovation, with online articles on specific technologies and a focus on the process by which new technology gets out of the lab and into the marketplace.
The mission of MIT Technology Review is to equip its audiences with the intelligence to understand a world shaped by technology. Edit Site Info

What technologies does technologyreview.com use?

These are the technologies used at technologyreview.com. technologyreview.com has a total of 7 technologies installed in 8 different categories.
Web Frameworks
Express Express
Web Servers
Express Express
Nginx Nginx
Tag Managers
Google Tag Manager Google Tag Manager
Security
HSTS HSTS
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
JavaScript Frameworks
React React
Programming Languages
Node.js Node.js

technologyreview.com Traffic Analysis

Technologyreview.com is ranked #128,085 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 79.1K visitors daily, generating a total of 140.9K pageviews. This equates to about 2.4M monthly visitors. Technologyreview.com traffic has increased by 11.18% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors79.1K
9.96%
Monthly Visits2.4M
11.18%
Pages per Visit1.78
12.89%
Visit duration01:05
38.7%
Bounce Rate72.41%
8.24%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
79,137
Monthly Visits:
2,397,851
Pages per Visit:
1.78
Daily Pageviews:
140,942
Avg. visit duration:
01:05
Bounce rate:
72.41%
Global Reach:
0.0016052%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
2,809,598
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
1,970,231
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
2,327,557
HypeRank:
128,085
SEMrush Rank:
18,719
SimilarWeb Rank:
36,209
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
49.86%
Referral:
7.36%
Search:
31.22%
Social:
11.42%
Paid:
0.14%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
36.18%
Mobile:
63.82%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

2.2M
OCT
2.2M
NOV
2.4M
DEC

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 41.34%
 
United Kingdom 6.27%
 
Canada 4.40%
 
India 3.81%
 
Germany 2.93%

Where do visitors go on technologyreview.com?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
technologyreview.com
98.00%94.42%1.3
event.technologyreview.com
2.40%2.88%2
forms.technologyreview.com
1.16%0.98%1
OTHER
0%1.72%0
Last update was 88 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with technologyreview.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
30,000
Bing Index:
181,000
Baidu Index:
57,000

Moz Data ▼

Domain Authority (DA) is a metric developed by Moz. DA is a score that predicts the ranking potential of a website on search engine result pages (SERPs). Moz calculates Domain Authority on a logarithmic scale from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating a greater likelihood of ranking well in search results. Moz Domain Authority of technologyreview.com is 88.
Domain Authority:
  88
Page Authority:
  63
MozRank:
  6

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  technologyreview.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  18,719
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  210,453
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  116,220
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $132,922.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $587.6 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $17.6K and annual gross revenue of approximately $214.5K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $614.8K.

How much would technologyreview.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$587.56
Monthly Revenue:
$17,626.80
Yearly Revenue:
$214,459.40
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 58,261$281.40
 
Canada 6,197$37.43
 
United Kingdom 8,843$23.70
 
Germany 4,126$5.78
 
India 5,376$2.04

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$66.05
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$1,981.47
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$24,107.87
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
16,153
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
484,587
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
5,895,808

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 10,487$50.65
 
Canada 1,549$9.36
 
United Kingdom 1,415$3.79
 
Germany 1,197$1.68
 
India 1,505$0.57

How much is technologyreview.com worth?

Website Value:
$614.8K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
technologyreview.com
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2018-03-06 16:06:42
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Passing

Desktop summary

Root domain:
technologyreview.com
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2018-03-06 16:06:42
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Passing

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
technologyreview.com
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2018-03-06 16:06:42
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Passing

Where is technologyreview.com hosted? ▼

Technologyreview.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
192.0.66.184
ASN:
AS2635 
ISP:
Automattic, Inc 
Server Location:
San Francisco
California, CA
94110
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 192.0.66.184

How fast does technologyreview.com load? ▼

The average loading time of technologyreview.com is 62 ms. The Desktop speed index is 38 and mobile speed index is 24.
Average Load Time:
62 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

38
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%

Lab Data


Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

24
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)20ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 79% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)31ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 4%

Lab Data

Timing budget  
Set a timing budget to help you keep an eye on the performance of your site. Performant sites load fast and respond to user input events quickly. Learn more about performance budgets
Largest Contentful Paint 14.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 15.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint 2.9 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 1,360 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 4,530 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 26.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Performance budget  
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more about performance budgets
First Contentful Paint (3G) 4075 ms
First Contentful Paint 3G marks the time at which the first text or image is painted while on a 3G network. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint (3G) metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Contentful Paint 2.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements

Does technologyreview.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on technologyreview.com are reduced by 89%.
technologyreview.com use br compression.
Original size: 714.25 KB
Compressed size: 78.3 KB
File reduced by: 635.95 KB (89%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. technologyreview.com has 93 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  93
Safety Confidence:
  51
Child Safety Reputations:
  94
Child Safety Confidence:
  49

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. technologyreview.com supports HTTPS.
 technologyreview.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.technologyreview.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R3
Valid from: Jan 6 19:05:38 2024 GMT
Valid until: Apr 5 19:05:37 2024 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: R3
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Sep 4 00:00:00 2020 GMT
Valid until: Sep 15 16:00:00 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: ISRG Root X1
Organization: Internet Security Research Group
Location: US
Issuer: DST Root CA X3
Valid from: Jan 20 19:14:03 2021 GMT
Valid until: Sep 30 18:14:03 2024 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 technologyreview.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Site Categories ▼

Website categories are used to classify websites based on their content or purpose. These categories provide a way to organize and filter websites, allowing users to find relevant information or ensure compliance with specific regulations or policies.
Publications/Journals and Magazines

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: nginx
date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:37:26 GMT
content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
content-length: 54
location: http://www.technologyreview.com/
x-powered-by: Express
x-rq: mdw2 96 185 443
age: 0
x-cache: miss
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000;includeSubdomains;preload

HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Server: nginx
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:37:26 GMT
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Length: 162
Connection: keep-alive
Location: https://www.technologyreview.com/

HTTP/2 200 
server: nginx
date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:37:26 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
content-length: 80184
x-powered-by: Express
x-frame-options: sameorigin
content-security-policy: frame-ancestors 'self';
etag: W/"b2900-anUvvZ5oTXUbi5bRzqApnPYNw1A"
content-encoding: br
cache-control: max-age=300, must-revalidate
x-rq: mdw2 96 184 443
age: 2725
x-cache: grace
vary: X-Mobile-Class, Accept-Encoding
accept-ranges: bytes
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000;includeSubdomains;preload

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT v=spf1 include:_u.technologyreview.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com ~all 14400
TXT adn_verification=techreview 14400
TXT docusign=fecf5307-94bf-43c4-a9f0-d90260bbe5dd 14400
TXT prowly-verification=5d8eae2922841d1560286ba7613a4df6fc1b6d499eb1ec55fd2594a378eb27e0 14400
SRV sipdir.online.lync.com 86400
SOA 86400
Mname ns1-01.azure-dns.com
Rname azuredns-hostmaster.microsoft.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 3600
Retry 300
Expire 2419200
Minimum TTL 300
A 192.0.66.184 3495
MX technologyreview-com.mail.protection.outlook.com 86400
NS ns3-01.azure-dns.org 117264
NS ns4-01.azure-dns.info 117264
NS ns1-01.azure-dns.com 117264
NS ns2-01.azure-dns.net 117264

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on February 23, 1998 and will expire on February 22, 2032 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Network Solutions, LLC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on April 3, 2023.
Domain Created:
1998-02-23
Domain Expires:
2032-02-22
Domain Updated:
2023-04-03
Domain Age:
26 years 2 months 3 days
Domain Registrar:
Network Solutions, LLC
Domain Owner:
PERFECT PRIVACY, LLC
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: TECHNOLOGYREVIEW.COM
Registry Domain ID: 905198_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Registrar URL: http://networksolutions.com
Updated Date: 2023-04-03T19:37:37Z
Creation Date: 1998-02-23T05:00:00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2032-02-22T05:00:00Z
Registrar: Network Solutions, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 2
Reseller: 
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 
Registrant Name: PERFECT PRIVACY, LLC
Registrant Organization: 
Registrant Street: 5335 Gate Parkway care of Network Solutions PO Box 459
Registrant City: Jacksonville
Registrant State/Province: FL
Registrant Postal Code: 32256
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.5707088622
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: email
Registry Admin ID: 
Admin Name: PERFECT PRIVACY, LLC
Admin Organization: 
Admin Street: 5335 Gate Parkway care of Network Solutions PO Box 459
Admin City: Jacksonville
Admin State/Province: FL
Admin Postal Code: 32256
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: +1.5707088622
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: email
Registry Tech ID: 
Tech Name: PERFECT PRIVACY, LLC
Tech Organization: 
Tech Street: 5335 Gate Parkway care of Network Solutions PO Box 459
Tech City: Jacksonville
Tech State/Province: FL
Tech Postal Code: 32256
Tech Country: US
Tech Phone: +1.5707088622
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email
Name Server: NS1-01.AZURE-DNS.COM
Name Server: NS2-01.AZURE-DNS.NET
Name Server: NS3-01.AZURE-DNS.ORG
Name Server: NS4-01.AZURE-DNS.INFO
DNSSEC: unsigned
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8777228662
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2024-01-29T10:39:10Z