simasbos.id Simasbos.id

   
Attention Required! | Cloudflare

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Simasbos.id?

• 9.5E-6% of global Internet users visit Simasbos.id

How many people visit Simasbos.id each day?

• Simasbos.id receives approximately 468 visitors and 2,098 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Simasbos.id receive most of its visitors from?

• Simasbos.id is mostly visited by people located in Indonesia.

How much Simasbos.id can earn?

• Simasbos.id should earn about $0.23/day from advertising revenue.

What is Simasbos.id estimated value?

• Estimated value of Simasbos.id is $236.42.

What IP addresses does Simasbos.id resolve to?

• Simasbos.id resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3035::6815:34f0, 104.21.52.240.

simasbos.id Profile

Title:Attention Required! | Cloudflare
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / File Sharing and Hosting
Edit Site Info

simasbos.id Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 468 visitors daily, generating a total of 2.1K pageviews. This equates to about 14.2K monthly visitors. Simasbos.id traffic has decreased by 7.71% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors468
6.33%
Monthly Visits14.2K
7.71%
Pages per Visit4.48
47.34%
Visit duration05:15
22.41%
Bounce Rate10.09%
33.59%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
468
Monthly Visits:
14,180
Pages per Visit:
4.48
Daily Pageviews:
2,098
Avg. visit duration:
05:15
Bounce rate:
10.09%
Global Reach:
9.5E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
193,521
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
10,769
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
14,323
HypeRank:
n/a
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,478,038
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
95.32%
Referral:
1.88%
Search:
0.48%
Social:
2.25%
Paid:
0.07%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
17.10%
Mobile:
82.90%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

17.6K
DEC
15.4K
JAN
14.2K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Indonesia 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to simasbos.id?

Websites similar to simasbos.id are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 79 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with simasbos.id in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  simasbos.id
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $6.9 and annual gross revenue of approximately $84. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $236.4.

How much would simasbos.id make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.23
Monthly Revenue:
$6.90
Yearly Revenue:
$83.95
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Indonesia 2,098$0.23

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.13
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$4.02
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$48.86
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
1,217
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
36,505
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
444,147

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Indonesia 1,217$0.13

How much is simasbos.id worth?

Website Value:
$236.4

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
simasbos.id
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
simasbos.id
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
simasbos.id
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is simasbos.id hosted? ▼

Simasbos.id may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.

How fast does simasbos.id load? ▼

The average loading time of simasbos.id is 56 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
56 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)7ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 79% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 12%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)407ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 82% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)58ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 85% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)7ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 79% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 12%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)407ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 82% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)58ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 85% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Lab Data

Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 0.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 0.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint 0.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 92% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)521ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 11% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 73% 16% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)316ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 57% 33% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 33% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 8%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.9s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 83% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 92% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)521ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 73% 16% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)316ms 57% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 57% 33% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 33% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 8%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.9s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 83% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 0.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Largest Contentful Paint 1.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Time to Interactive 1.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Does simasbos.id use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on simasbos.id are reduced by 65%.
simasbos.id use br compression.
Original size: 4.41 KB
Compressed size: 1.53 KB
File reduced by: 2.88 KB (65%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. simasbos.id supports HTTPS.
 simasbos.id supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: simasbos.id
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Feb 15 08:47:24 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 16 09:45:41 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 simasbos.id supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:04:42 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
referrer-policy: same-origin
cache-control: max-age=15
expires: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:04:57 GMT
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=5Xi5qmCytifUEPOl4Z16cH1MivBLP6%2B3GCuOuoYHxd9FfyU9R57zGVPUyDfqTnWLf5paJDkTEFpHGgtNFzq3%2Fq7Gf2hL9v2eDMLnEeCzt26%2BPeCdZDUNreg%2BdRaI9w%3D%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
vary: Accept-Encoding
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 9293d4a2dbd4e80d-ORD
content-encoding: br
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=2371&min_rtt=2296&rtt_var=600&sent=7&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3409&recv_bytes=891&delivery_rate=1049275&cwnd=253&unsent_bytes=0&cid=36cb1caa02b5a724&ts=45&x=0"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3036::ac43:cd78 262
AAAA 2606:4700:3035::6815:34f0 262
A 104.21.52.240 261
A 172.67.205.120 261
NS olivia.ns.cloudflare.com 3561
NS dexter.ns.cloudflare.com 3561
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on July 29, 2019 and will expire on July 29, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar PT Web Media Technology Indonesia. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on June 29, 2024.
Domain Created:
2019-07-29
Domain Expires:
2025-07-29
Domain Updated:
2024-06-29
Domain Age:
5 years 10 months 21 days
Domain Registrar:
PT Web Media Technology Indonesia
WhoIs:
 

ID ccTLD whois server
Please see 'whois -h whois.id help' for usage.

Domain ID: PANDI-DO1538266
Domain Name: simasbos.id
Created On: 2019-07-29 03:57:05
Last Updated On: 2024-06-29 06:36:22 
Expiration Date: 2025-07-29 23:59:59 
Status: ok

====================================================
Sponsoring Registrar Organization: PT Web Media Technology Indonesia
Sponsoring Registrar URL: https://niagahoster.co.id
Sponsoring Registrar Street: Jl. Palagan Tentara Pelajar No. 81 Jongkang, Sariharjo, Ngaglik  
Sponsoring Registrar City: Sleman
Sponsoring Registrar State/Province: Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta
Sponsoring Registrar Postal Code: 55581
Sponsoring Registrar Country: ID
Sponsoring Registrar Phone: 02150861682
Sponsoring Registrar Email: email
Name Server: dexter.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: olivia.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: Unsigned

Abuse Domain Report https://pandi.id/domain-abuse-form/?lang=en
For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/epp-status-codes-2014-06-16-en