savefrom.net Savefrom.net

   
YouTube Downloader - Download Youtube videos for free!

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Savefrom.net?

• Savefrom.net ranks #933 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Savefrom.net?

• 0.0768592% of global Internet users visit Savefrom.net

How many people visit Savefrom.net each day?

• Savefrom.net receives approximately 3.8M visitors and 12,122,330 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Savefrom.net receive most of its visitors from?

• Savefrom.net is mostly visited by people located in Russian Federation,Indonesia,India.

How much Savefrom.net can earn?

• Savefrom.net should earn about $35,335.07/day from advertising revenue.

What is Savefrom.net estimated value?

• Estimated value of Savefrom.net is $40,267,001.70.

What IP addresses does Savefrom.net resolve to?

• Savefrom.net resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:10::6816:28d8, 172.67.43.182.

Where are Savefrom.net servers located in?

• Savefrom.net has servers located in Paris, Paris, 75001, United States.

savefrom.net Profile

Title:YouTube Downloader - Download Youtube videos for free!
Description:We offer the fastest way to save YouTube videos in mp3, mp4, or in other range of formats. It’s the most convenient YouTube video downloader you’ve ever tried!
Tags:
download
internet tools
video
youtube download
софт
интернет
downloader
rapidshare
download youtube videos
youtube
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / File Sharing and Hosting
About: Предоставляет возможность получения прямых ссылок для загрузки файлов с популярных файлообменников и медиахостингов.
Free Online service to Download YouTube videos at one click! The best YouTube Downloader supporting fast and easy vimeo, Facebook and Dailymotion video Download and much more! Edit Site Info

What technologies does savefrom.net use?

These are the technologies used at savefrom.net. savefrom.net has a total of 2 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3

savefrom.net Traffic Analysis

Savefrom.net is ranked #933 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 3.8M visitors daily, generating a total of 12.1M pageviews. This equates to about 114.8M monthly visitors. Savefrom.net traffic has increased by 0.22% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors3.8M
5.28%
Monthly Visits114.8M
0.22%
Pages per Visit3.20
0.04%
Visit duration03:07
2.08%
Bounce Rate42.40%
0.29%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
3,789,100
Monthly Visits:
114,809,730
Pages per Visit:
3.20
Daily Pageviews:
12,122,330
Avg. visit duration:
03:07
Bounce rate:
42.40%
Global Reach:
0.0768592%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
242,222,170
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
88,019,210
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
112,547,531
HypeRank:
933
SEMrush Rank:
4,943
SimilarWeb Rank:
358
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
50.92%
Referral:
1.04%
Search:
45.52%
Social:
2.39%
Paid:
0.14%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
22.80%
Mobile:
77.20%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

139.3M
DEC
114.6M
JAN
114.8M
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Russian Federation 10.19%
 
Indonesia 7.91%
 
India 5.41%
 
Mexico 4.56%
 
Brazil 3.77%

Where do visitors go on savefrom.net?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
en.savefrom.net
49.55%45.62%1.16
ru.savefrom.net
16.83%21.28%1.60
es.savefrom.net
7.95%7.43%1.2
pt1.savefrom.net
6.10%5.69%1.2
fr.savefrom.net
3.66%3.51%1.2

Which sites are competitors to savefrom.net?

Websites similar to savefrom.net are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 47 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with savefrom.net in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1,180
Bing Index:
2,200
Baidu Index:
23,500

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  savefrom.net
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  4,943
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  81,794
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  541,928
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $359,232.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $35.3K per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $1.1M and annual gross revenue of approximately $12.9M. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $40.3M.

How much would savefrom.net make?

Daily Revenue:
$35,335.07
Monthly Revenue:
$1,060,052.10
Yearly Revenue:
$12,897,300.55
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Brazil 457,075$607.91
 
Russian Federation 1,235,525$506.57
 
India 655,234$248.99
 
Mexico 552,667$154.75
 
Indonesia 959,246$105.52

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$211.71
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$6,351.37
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$77,275.05
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
891,124
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
26,733,719
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
325,260,250

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
India 183,466$69.72
 
Indonesia 556,362$61.20
 
Brazil 27,424$36.47
 
Russian Federation 74,132$30.39
 
Mexico 49,740$13.93

How much is savefrom.net worth?

Website Value:
$40.3M

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
savefrom.net
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2022-04-18 07:31:18
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Passing

Desktop summary

Root domain:
savefrom.net
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2024-11-20 05:39:30
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Passing

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
savefrom.net
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2024-11-20 05:39:30
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Passing

Where is savefrom.net hosted? ▼

Savefrom.net may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:10::6816:28d8, 172.67.43.182
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:
Paris
Paris, 75
75001
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 172.67.43.182

How fast does savefrom.net load? ▼

The average loading time of savefrom.net is 1316 ms. The Desktop speed index is 93 and mobile speed index is 85.
Average Load Time:
1316 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

93
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)9ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 79% 18% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 18% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.7s 56% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 56% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20% 23% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 23%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 73% 13% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)116ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 85% 9% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 9% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 5%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 77% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)9ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 79% 18% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 18% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.7s 56% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 56% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20% 23% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 23%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 73% 13% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)116ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 85% 9% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 9% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 5%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 77% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14%

Lab Data

LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint 1.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 120 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 1.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 40 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 1.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

85
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)24ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 31% 45% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 45% 22% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 22%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)834ms 56% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 73% 18% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 18% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 78% 13% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)326ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 51% 34% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 34% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 14%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 86% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)24ms 31% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 31% 45% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 45% 22% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 22%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)834ms 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 73% 18% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 18% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 78% 13% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)326ms 51% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 51% 34% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 34% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 14%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 86% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Max Potential First Input Delay 170 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 3.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint 3.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Total Blocking Time 120 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Time to Interactive 8.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 2.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Does savefrom.net use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on savefrom.net are reduced by 58%.
savefrom.net use br compression.
Original size: 2.63 KB
Compressed size: 1.08 KB
File reduced by: 1.55 KB (58%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. savefrom.net has 91 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  91
Safety Confidence:
  35
Child Safety Reputations:
  87
Child Safety Confidence:
  30

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. savefrom.net supports HTTPS.
 savefrom.net supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: savefrom.net
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Feb 3 04:30:50 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 4 05:30:38 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 savefrom.net supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Site Categories ▼

Website categories are used to classify websites based on their content or purpose. These categories provide a way to organize and filter websites, allowing users to find relevant information or ensure compliance with specific regulations or policies.
Интернет/Веб-приложения

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 23:07:35 GMT
content-type: text/html
location: https://en.savefrom.net/
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 91f6f2d858348114-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400

HTTP/2 301 
date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 23:07:35 GMT
content-type: text/html
location: https://en1.savefrom.net/3Nz/
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 91f6f2d9f8b72264-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400

HTTP/2 302 
date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 23:07:35 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
location: https://us.savefrom.net
cache-control: no-cache, private
cross-origin-embedder-policy: unsafe-none
cross-origin-opener-policy: same-origin
last-modified: Mar 12 2025 20:04:53 GMT
set-cookie: lang=en; expires=Sat, 10-Mar-2035 23:07:35 GMT; Max-Age=315360000; path=/; domain=.savefrom.net
set-cookie: country=US;Path=/;Max-Age=604800
x-frame-options: sameorigin
x-powered-by: PHP/8.0.30
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 91f6f2dbaf609991-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400

HTTP/2 200 
date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 23:07:36 GMT
content-type: text/html
last-modified: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 14:49:34 GMT
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 91f6f2decd1a107c-ORD
content-encoding: br
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:10::ac43:2bb6 236
AAAA 2606:4700:10::6816:29d8 236
AAAA 2606:4700:10::6816:28d8 236
A 172.67.43.182 236
A 104.22.41.216 236
A 104.22.40.216 236
NS kira.ns.cloudflare.com 172736
NS kianchau.ns.cloudflare.com 172736
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on March 12, 2008 and will expire on March 12, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar TUCOWS, INC.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on September 30, 2024.
Domain Created:
2008-03-12
Domain Expires:
2026-03-12
Domain Updated:
2024-09-30
Domain Age:
17 years 1 months 17 days
Domain Registrar:
TUCOWS, INC.
Domain Owner:
REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: SAVEFROM.NET
Registry Domain ID: 1421168340_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://tucowsdomains.com
Updated Date: 2024-09-30T10:51:07
Creation Date: 2008-03-12T19:50:58
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2026-03-12T19:50:58
Registrar: TUCOWS, INC.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 
Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Registrant City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant State/Province: Charlestown
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Country: KN
Registrant Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: https://tieredaccess.com/contact/2a4a0a94-60da-475c-9ce5-2e944971a99b
Registry Admin ID: 
Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registry Tech ID: 
Tech Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Name Server: kira.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: kianchau.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4165350123
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: https://icann.org/wicf
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-12T23:08:37Z