shadow.so Shadow.so

   
Shadow Exchange

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Shadow.so?

• Shadow.so ranks #19,929,796 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Shadow.so?

• 0.0002931% of global Internet users visit Shadow.so

How many people visit Shadow.so each day?

• Shadow.so receives approximately 14.4K visitors and 108,979 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Shadow.so receive most of its visitors from?

• Shadow.so is mostly visited by people located in United States,United Kingdom,Switzerland.

How much Shadow.so can earn?

• Shadow.so should earn about $461.81/day from advertising revenue.

What is Shadow.so estimated value?

• Estimated value of Shadow.so is $446,891.18.

What IP addresses does Shadow.so resolve to?

• Shadow.so resolves to the IP addresses 76.76.21.21.

Where are Shadow.so servers located in?

• Shadow.so has servers located in Walnut, California, 91789, United States.

shadow.so Profile

Title:Shadow Exchange Description:A Sonic-native concentrated liquidity exchange. The ultimate trading hub on Sonic.
Category:Finance / Other Finance
Edit Site Info

What technologies does shadow.so use?

These are the technologies used at shadow.so. shadow.so has a total of 4 technologies installed in 4 different categories.
Security
HSTS HSTS
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
Performance
Priority Hints Priority Hints
Web Servers
Vercel Vercel

shadow.so Traffic Analysis

Shadow.so is ranked #19,929,796 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 14.4K visitors daily, generating a total of 109K pageviews. This equates to about 437.8K monthly visitors. Shadow.so traffic has increased by 17.24% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors14.4K
4.59%
Monthly Visits437.8K
17.24%
Pages per Visit7.54
13.12%
Visit duration09:05
29.33%
Bounce Rate24.08%
1.51%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
14,448
Monthly Visits:
437,774
Pages per Visit:
7.54
Daily Pageviews:
108,979
Avg. visit duration:
09:05
Bounce rate:
24.08%
Global Reach:
0.0002931%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
237,466
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
47,574
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
437,814
HypeRank:
19,929,796
SEMrush Rank:
4,850,992
SimilarWeb Rank:
96,003
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
84.74%
Referral:
9.95%
Search:
2.53%
Social:
2.73%
Paid:
0.05%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
91.70%
Mobile:
8.30%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

7.6K
JAN
373.4K
FEB
437.8K
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 37.31%
 
United Kingdom 11.37%
 
Switzerland 9.39%
 
Viet Nam 5.30%
 
Canada 4.60%

Which sites are competitors to shadow.so?

Websites similar to shadow.so are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 42 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with shadow.so in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
462

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  shadow.so
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  4,850,992
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  37
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  45
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $164.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $461.8 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $13.9K and annual gross revenue of approximately $168.6K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $446.9K.

How much would shadow.so make?

Daily Revenue:
$461.81
Monthly Revenue:
$13,854.30
Yearly Revenue:
$168,560.65
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 40,656$196.37
 
Switzerland 10,236$56.81
 
United Kingdom 12,386$33.20
 
Canada 5,012$30.27
 
Viet Nam 5,774$2.71

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$58.56
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$1,756.79
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$21,374.30
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
12,626
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
378,789
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
4,608,599

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 7,318$35.35
 
Switzerland 1,843$10.23
 
Canada 1,253$7.57
 
United Kingdom 1,982$5.31
 
Viet Nam 231$0.11

How much is shadow.so worth?

Website Value:
$446.9K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
shadow.so
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
shadow.so
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
shadow.so
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is shadow.so hosted? ▼

Shadow.so may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
76.76.21.21
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:
Walnut
California, CA
91789
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 76.76.21.21

How fast does shadow.so load? ▼

The average loading time of shadow.so is 93 ms. The Desktop speed index is 50 and mobile speed index is 33.
Average Load Time:
93 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

50
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)22ms 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 69% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6% 24% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 24%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)483ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 87% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 74% 15% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)426ms 54% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 54% 24% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 24% 21% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 21%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.9s 68% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 68% 17% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 17% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)44ms 52% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 52% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13% 34% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 34%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)321ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 80% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)379ms 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 59% 21% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 21% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 19%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.8s 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 59% 18% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 18% 22% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 22%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 0.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Total Blocking Time 1,380 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 4.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Speed Index 1.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint 3.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 1,210 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

33
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 80% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 11%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)742ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 76% 16% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 76% 13% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)559ms 54% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 44% 28% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 28% 27% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 27%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.5s 68% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 74% 13% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 12%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)18ms 62% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 62% 17% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 17% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 19%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)540ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 84% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)539ms 47% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 47% 26% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 26% 26% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 26%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 76% 12% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 12% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Max Potential First Input Delay 2,040 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 23.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Speed Index 9.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Total Blocking Time 2,620 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 2.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Time to Interactive 25.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Does shadow.so use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on shadow.so are reduced by 87%.
shadow.so use br compression.
Original size: 24.75 KB
Compressed size: 3.21 KB
File reduced by: 21.54 KB (87%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. shadow.so has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. shadow.so supports HTTPS.
 shadow.so supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.shadow.so
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Apr 26 13:18:52 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 25 13:18:51 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 shadow.so supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
cache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate
content-type: text/plain
date: Mon, 05 May 2025 17:34:37 GMT
location: https://www.shadow.so/
refresh: 0;url=https://www.shadow.so/
server: Vercel
strict-transport-security: max-age=63072000
x-vercel-id: cle1::qhwdp-1746466477289-8e7d7d06c93e

HTTP/2 200 
access-control-allow-origin: *
age: 276245
cache-control: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate
content-disposition: inline
content-encoding: br
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
date: Mon, 05 May 2025 17:34:37 GMT
etag: W/"95fc54d28e672c0ab55c43d4173846da"
server: Vercel
strict-transport-security: max-age=63072000
x-matched-path: /
x-vercel-cache: HIT
x-vercel-id: cle1::ksmz7-1746466477336-f9c11e9c3d26

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 76.76.21.21 227
NS rohin.ns.cloudflare.com 86327
NS aspen.ns.cloudflare.com 86327
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on June 18, 2021 and will expire on June 18, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Dynadot LLC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on December 25, 2024.
Domain Created:
2021-06-18
Domain Expires:
2025-06-18
Domain Updated:
2024-12-25
Domain Age:
3 years 29 days
Domain Registrar:
Dynadot LLC
Domain Owner:
Dynadot Privacy Service
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: shadow.so
Registry Domain ID: 168065-sonic
Updated Date: 2024-12-25T02:30:47Z
Creation Date: 2021-06-18T14:10:39Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-06-18T14:10:39Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-06-18T14:10:39Z
Registrar: Dynadot LLC
Registrar Street Address: 205 East 3rd Ave. Suite 314
San Mateo
California	94401
Registrar Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 280632-sonic
Registrant Name: Dynadot Privacy Service
Name Server: aspen.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: rohin.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-05-05T17:35:49.636Z