savetwitter.net Savetwitter.net

   
Download Twitter Video (X), Photo, GIF - Twitter Downloader

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Savetwitter.net?

• Savetwitter.net ranks #97,851 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Savetwitter.net?

0.0013698% of global Internet users visit Savetwitter.net

How many people visit Savetwitter.net each day?

• Savetwitter.net receives approximately 67.5K visitors and 200,815 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Savetwitter.net receive most of its visitors from?

• Savetwitter.net is mostly visited by people located in China,United States,Korea, Republic of.

How much Savetwitter.net can earn?

• Savetwitter.net should earn about $524.65/day from advertising revenue.

What is Savetwitter.net estimated value?

• Estimated value of Savetwitter.net is $510,953.26.

What IP addresses does Savetwitter.net resolve to?

• Savetwitter.net resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:20::681a:b83, 172.67.74.51.

Where are Savetwitter.net servers located in?

• Savetwitter.net has servers located in United States.

savetwitter.net Profile

Title:Download Twitter Video (X), Photo, GIF - Twitter Downloader
Description:SaveTwitter is a Twitter downloader, allow to download Twitter video, download Twitter GIF, download mp3 from Twitter online on iPhone, Android.
Tags:
Category:Arts and Entertainment / Visual Arts and Design
About: Savetwitter.net is a website designed to help users download videos from Twitter. The platform allows individuals to input the URL of a Twitter video they wish to save, offering a convenient way to download and store the media on their personal devices. This can be particularly useful for saving content that users want to access offline or archive for future reference. The process typically involves copying the link of the tweet containing the video and pasting it into the provided field on savetwitter.net, which then generates a downloadable file. As with any third-party service, it's important to use it responsibly and be mindful of copyright and privacy considerations.
*This text is generated by artificial intelligence and may not be accurate. Edit Site Info

What technologies does savetwitter.net use?

These are the technologies used at savetwitter.net. savetwitter.net has a total of 4 technologies installed in 3 different categories.

savetwitter.net Traffic Analysis

Savetwitter.net is ranked #97,851 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 67.5K visitors daily, generating a total of 200.8K pageviews. This equates to about 2M monthly visitors. Savetwitter.net traffic has increased by 6.83% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors67.5K
12.98%
Monthly Visits2M
6.83%
Pages per Visit2.97
8.85%
Visit duration05:10
26.06%
Bounce Rate42.38%
13.25%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
67,532
Monthly Visits:
2,046,220
Pages per Visit:
2.97
Daily Pageviews:
200,815
Avg. visit duration:
05:10
Bounce rate:
42.38%
Global Reach:
0.0013698%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
4,406,665
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
1,143,198
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
1,986,227
HypeRank:
97,851
SEMrush Rank:
320,323
SimilarWeb Rank:
35,008
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
66.71%
Referral:
3.25%
Search:
29.67%
Social:
0.35%
Paid:
0.03%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
16.15%
Mobile:
83.85%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

2M
MAY
1.9M
JUN
2M
JUL

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
China 20.37%
 
United States 16.02%
 
Korea, Republic of 11.84%
 
Thailand 4.84%
 
Taiwan 4.61%

Which sites are competitors to savetwitter.net?

Websites similar to savetwitter.net are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 90 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with savetwitter.net in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
251
Bing Index:
216

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  savetwitter.net
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  320,323
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  1,152
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  5,001
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $7.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $524.7 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $15.7K and annual gross revenue of approximately $191.5K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $511K.

How much would savetwitter.net make?

Daily Revenue:
$524.65
Monthly Revenue:
$15,739.50
Yearly Revenue:
$191,497.25
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 32,166$155.36
 
Korea, Republic of 23,776$14.27
 
China 40,907$4.09
 
Taiwan 9,260$2.13
 
Thailand 9,715$2.04

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$29.53
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$885.91
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$10,778.60
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
14,123
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
423,698
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
5,154,996

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 5,790$27.96
 
Korea, Republic of 951$0.57
 
China 5,318$0.53
 
Taiwan 1,482$0.34
 
Thailand 583$0.12

How much is savetwitter.net worth?

Website Value:
$511K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
savetwitter.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
savetwitter.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
savetwitter.net
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is savetwitter.net hosted?

Savetwitter.net may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:20::681a:b83, 172.67.74.51
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 172.67.74.51

How fast does savetwitter.net load?

The average loading time of savetwitter.net is 47 ms. The Desktop speed index is 96 and mobile speed index is 59.
Average Load Time:
47 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

96
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)8ms 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 77% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)300ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)590ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)1ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)62ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)733ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)8ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 78% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)275ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)589ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)1ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)64ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)731ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Speed Index 0.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Meaningful Paint 0.3 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
Time to Interactive 1.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

59
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)23ms 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 25% 53% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 53% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 20%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)460ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)26ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 92% 6% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 1%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)210ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 72% 21% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 21% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 91% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)24ms 26% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 26% 49% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 49% 23% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 23%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)412ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)26ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 92% 6% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 1%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)215ms 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 71% 22% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 22% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Time to Interactive 14.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 1,370 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Speed Index 3.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint 1.1 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Contentful Paint 1.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint 1.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 6,220 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric

Does savetwitter.net use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on savetwitter.net are reduced by 73%.
savetwitter.net use br compression.
Original size: 28.69 KB
Compressed size: 7.71 KB
File reduced by: 20.98 KB (73%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. savetwitter.net has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. savetwitter.net supports HTTPS.
 savetwitter.net supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: savetwitter.net
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Jul 6 03:21:07 2024 GMT
Valid until: Oct 4 03:21:06 2024 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 savetwitter.net supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 07:59:19 GMT
content-length: 0
location: /en
x-frame-options: DENY
cache-control: max-age=3600
cf-cache-status: HIT
age: 70224
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=Frt4AOCNM59IiWcb65lBu%2FyyRKZDpchPfxoMC2J82Ve9VmyMSy1uQolPusQeQCEbdXsPQcWZde6taZhzBi4yW2OUFixb1jiKnC%2BDFG3WMh0oC33C%2BVGqTKbPPfYN65ql%2Bg%3D%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
vary: Accept-Encoding
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 8b691541e8e18f4f-ORD

HTTP/2 200 
date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 07:59:19 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-frame-options: DENY
cache-control: max-age=3600
cf-cache-status: HIT
age: 67472
last-modified: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 13:14:47 GMT
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=1ONxvDPQdyDDGCnSn2Gw1OZ63llOE2rZtq2DmKqu3Sls3%2FwkeyLfyexK8BBLUgQ9gHzqsbG%2BGS4g%2FSXMWPepeqomaD2H6LqlQo6%2BQ3q7kIQPvshKpt2USrmlzrpS9VRiJQ%3D%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 8b691541f8ec8f4f-ORD
content-encoding: br

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:20::681a:a83 246
AAAA 2606:4700:20::ac43:4a33 246
AAAA 2606:4700:20::681a:b83 246
A 104.26.11.131 246
A 172.67.74.51 246
A 104.26.10.131 246
NS alice.ns.cloudflare.com 172746
NS amir.ns.cloudflare.com 172746
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on July 19, 2022 and will expire on July 19, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Name.com, Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on January 17, 2024.
Domain Created:
2022-07-19
Domain Expires:
2025-07-19
Domain Updated:
2024-01-17
Domain Age:
2 years 4 months
Domain Registrar:
Name.com, Inc.
Domain Owner:
Domain Protection Services, Inc.
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: SAVETWITTER.NET 
Registry Domain ID: 2712098660_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN 
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.name.com 
Registrar URL: http://www.name.com 
Updated Date: 2024-01-17T05:55:06Z 
Creation Date: 2022-07-19T06:19:10Z 
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-07-19T06:19:10Z 
Registrar: Name.com, Inc. 
Registrar IANA ID: 625 
Reseller:  
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited 
Registry Registrant ID: Not Available From Registry 
Registrant Name: Redacted For Privacy 
Registrant Organization: Domain Protection Services, Inc. 
Registrant Street: PO Box 1769  
Registrant City: Denver 
Registrant State/Province: CO 
Registrant Postal Code: 80201 
Registrant Country: US 
Registrant Phone: +1.7208009072 
Registrant Fax: +1.7209758725 
Registrant Email: https://www.name.com/contact-domain-whois/savetwitter.net 
Registry Admin ID: Not Available From Registry 
Admin Name: Redacted For Privacy 
Admin Organization: Domain Protection Services, Inc. 
Admin Street: PO Box 1769  
Admin City: Denver 
Admin State/Province: CO 
Admin Postal Code: 80201 
Admin Country: US 
Admin Phone: +1.7208009072 
Admin Fax: +1.7209758725 
Admin Email: https://www.name.com/contact-domain-whois/savetwitter.net 
Registry Tech ID: Not Available From Registry 
Tech Name: Redacted For Privacy 
Tech Organization: Domain Protection Services, Inc. 
Tech Street: PO Box 1769  
Tech City: Denver 
Tech State/Province: CO 
Tech Postal Code: 80201 
Tech Country: US 
Tech Phone: +1.7208009072 
Tech Fax: +1.7209758725 
Tech Email: https://www.name.com/contact-domain-whois/savetwitter.net 
Name Server: alice.ns.cloudflare.com 
Name Server: amir.ns.cloudflare.com 
DNSSEC: unSigned 
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email 
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.7203101849 
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2024-08-21T08:00:13Z