rijpemilfchat.nl Rijpemilfchat.nl

   
RijpeMilfChat.nl - Chat met Ervaren Milfs in Nederland

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Rijpemilfchat.nl?

• 6.0E-7% of global Internet users visit Rijpemilfchat.nl

How many people visit Rijpemilfchat.nl each day?

• Rijpemilfchat.nl receives approximately 31 visitors and 85 page impressions per day.

How much Rijpemilfchat.nl can earn?

• Rijpemilfchat.nl should earn about $0.35/day from advertising revenue.

What is Rijpemilfchat.nl estimated value?

• Estimated value of Rijpemilfchat.nl is $324.33.

What IP addresses does Rijpemilfchat.nl resolve to?

• Rijpemilfchat.nl resolves to the IP addresses 195.238.86.215.

Where are Rijpemilfchat.nl servers located in?

• Rijpemilfchat.nl has servers located in The Netherlands.

rijpemilfchat.nl Profile

Title:RijpeMilfChat.nl - Chat met Ervaren Milfs in Nederland
Description:RijpeMilfChat.nl - Chat met ervaren MILFs in Nederland voor spannende gesprekken en nieuwe connecties. Ontdek vandaag nog opwindende verbindingen.
Edit Site Info

What technologies does rijpemilfchat.nl use?

These are the technologies used at rijpemilfchat.nl. rijpemilfchat.nl has a total of 12 technologies installed in 11 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server
JavaScript Libraries
Axios Axios
jQuery jQuery
UI frameworks
Bootstrap Bootstrap
Web Frameworks
CodeIgniter CodeIgniter
Font Scripts
Font Awesome Font Awesome
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
Authentication
Google Sign-in Google Sign-in
CDN
jsDelivr jsDelivr
Widgets
OWL Carousel OWL Carousel
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
JavaScript Frameworks
Vue.js Vue.js

rijpemilfchat.nl Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 31 visitors daily, generating a total of 85 pageviews. This equates to about 0.9K monthly visitors. Rijpemilfchat.nl traffic has decreased by 62.59% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors31
92.83%
Monthly Visits0.9K
62.59%
Pages per Visit2.76
35.41%
Visit duration00:27
96.82%
Bounce Rate32.34%
61.21%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
31
Monthly Visits:
939
Pages per Visit:
2.76
Daily Pageviews:
85
Avg. visit duration:
00:27
Bounce rate:
32.34%
Global Reach:
6.0E-7%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
909
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
153
HypeRank:
n/a
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
31.67%
Referral:
68.33%
Search:
0%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%
Last update was 1 day ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with rijpemilfchat.nl in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  rijpemilfchat.nl
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $10.5 and annual gross revenue of approximately $127.8. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $324.3.

How much would rijpemilfchat.nl make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.35
Monthly Revenue:
$10.50
Yearly Revenue:
$127.75
*All earnings values are estimates only.

How much is rijpemilfchat.nl worth?

Website Value:
$324.3

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
rijpemilfchat.nl
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
rijpemilfchat.nl
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
rijpemilfchat.nl
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is rijpemilfchat.nl hosted? ▼

Rijpemilfchat.nl may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
195.238.86.215
ASN:
AS41960 
ISP:
Nextpertise B.V. 
Server Location:

The Netherlands, NL
 

Other sites hosted on 195.238.86.215

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does rijpemilfchat.nl load? ▼

The average loading time of rijpemilfchat.nl is 379 ms. The Desktop speed index is 92 and mobile speed index is 77.
Average Load Time:
379 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

92
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)133ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)426ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)34ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)878ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)133ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)426ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)34ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)878ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint 1.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 0.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Time to Interactive 1.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Speed Index 2.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

77
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 92% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)341ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)660ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)88ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 92% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)341ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)660ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)88ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 30 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Speed Index 4.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 6.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Contentful Paint 2.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 4.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Does rijpemilfchat.nl use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on rijpemilfchat.nl are reduced by 71%.
rijpemilfchat.nl use gzip compression.
Original size: 24.43 KB
Compressed size: 6.93 KB
File reduced by: 17.5 KB (71%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. rijpemilfchat.nl has 68 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  68
Safety Confidence:
  5

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. rijpemilfchat.nl supports HTTPS.
 rijpemilfchat.nl supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.rijpemilfchat.nl
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1
Valid from: Aug 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Aug 30 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Common Name: RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1
Organization: DigiCert Inc, OU = www.digicert.com
Location: US
Issuer: DigiCert Global Root G2
Valid from: Nov 2 12:24:33 2017 GMT
Valid until: Nov 2 12:24:33 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 rijpemilfchat.nl does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 14:08:03 GMT
Server: Apache
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.6.30-0+deb8u1
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: X-API-KEY, Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept, Access-Control-Request-Method
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, OPTIONS, PUT, DELETE
Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: public, max-age=3600, must-revalidate
Content-Encoding: gzip
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Set-Cookie: ci_session=4otl1nk6icvn4t4is93c51gdbour2cea; expires=Wed, 09-Jul-2025 14:08:03 GMT; Max-Age=8640000; path=/; SameSite=Lax; domain=.rijpemilfchat.nl; HttpOnly
Last-Modified: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:00:00 GMT
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT google-site-verification=sn8K5dXumHsj3VMrdhs163ryQxvMCF1gxNvZkAH6wHQ 3600
TXT brevo-code:94e831aefb94090fb550060ca898ae8e 3600
TXT yahoo-verification-key=cpD/gplGHJ2ysKf6Clyib/w4rDKgNLBQQJgGEmbbSfg= 3600
MX nextpertise.email 3600
SOA 3600
Mname ns1.dnszones.eu
Rname hostmaster.dnszones.eu
Serial Number 2024051447
Refresh 28800
Retry 7200
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 3600
A 195.238.86.215 3547
NS ns3.dnszones.be 3547
NS ns2.dnszones.nl 3547
NS ns1.dnszones.eu 3547

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on September 1, 2023 and will expire on April 2, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Registrar.eu. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on May 14, 2024.
Domain Created:
2023-09-01
Domain Updated:
2024-05-14
Domain Age:
1 years 7 months 1 days
Domain Registrar:
Registrar.eu
WhoIs:
 

Domain name: rijpemilfchat.nl
Status:      active

Registrar:
   Registrar.eu
   Hofplein 20
   3032AC Rotterdam
   Netherlands

Abuse Contact:
   +31.104482297
   email

DNSSEC:      yes

Domain nameservers:
   ns3.dnszones.be
   ns2.dnszones.nl
   ns1.dnszones.eu

Creation Date: 2023-09-01

Updated Date: 2024-05-14

Record maintained by: SIDN BV