qrpl.us Qrpl.us

   
Este é um recurso da QR Plus - Informação

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Qrpl.us?

• Qrpl.us ranks #728,093 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Qrpl.us?

• 3.75E-5% of global Internet users visit Qrpl.us

How many people visit Qrpl.us each day?

• Qrpl.us receives approximately 1.8K visitors and 2,185 page impressions per day.

How much Qrpl.us can earn?

• Qrpl.us should earn about $8.92/day from advertising revenue.

What is Qrpl.us estimated value?

• Estimated value of Qrpl.us is $8,127.54.

What IP addresses does Qrpl.us resolve to?

• Qrpl.us resolves to the IP addresses 20.206.176.0.

Where are Qrpl.us servers located in?

• Qrpl.us has servers located in Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

qrpl.us Profile

Title:Este é um recurso da QR Plus - Informação Description:Este é um recurso da QR Plus - Informação
Edit Site Info

What technologies does qrpl.us use?

These are the technologies used at qrpl.us. qrpl.us has a total of 5 technologies installed in 5 different categories.
UI frameworks
Bootstrap Bootstrap
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
CDN
jsDelivr jsDelivr
Web Servers
Kestrel Kestrel
Web Frameworks
Microsoft ASP.NET Microsoft ASP.NET

qrpl.us Traffic Analysis

Qrpl.us is ranked #728,093 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 1.8K visitors daily, generating a total of 2.2K pageviews. This equates to about 56K monthly visitors. Qrpl.us traffic has decreased by 45.2% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1.8K
38.26%
Monthly Visits56K
45.2%
Pages per Visit1.18
5.32%
Visit duration00:28
76.05%
Bounce Rate81.65%
9.26%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,848
Monthly Visits:
55,994
Pages per Visit:
1.18
Daily Pageviews:
2,185
Avg. visit duration:
00:28
Bounce rate:
81.65%
Global Reach:
3.75E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
58,782
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
58,050
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
54,881
HypeRank:
728,093
SimilarWeb Rank:
728,093
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
99.16%
Referral:
0%
Search:
0%
Social:
0.84%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
0.84%
Mobile:
99.16%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

100.3K
DEC
102.2K
JAN
56K
FEB
Last update was 79 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with qrpl.us in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  qrpl.us
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $8.9 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $267.6 and annual gross revenue of approximately $3.3K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $8.1K.

How much would qrpl.us make?

Daily Revenue:
$8.92
Monthly Revenue:
$267.60
Yearly Revenue:
$3,255.80
*All earnings values are estimates only.

How much is qrpl.us worth?

Website Value:
$8.1K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
qrpl.us
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
qrpl.us
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
qrpl.us
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is qrpl.us hosted? ▼

Qrpl.us may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
20.206.176.0
ASN:
AS8075 
ISP:
Microsoft Corporation 
Server Location:
Campinas
Sao Paulo, SP
Brazil, BR
 

Other sites hosted on 20.206.176.0

How fast does qrpl.us load? ▼

The average loading time of qrpl.us is 607 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 94.
Average Load Time:
607 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 88% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)626ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)883ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 88% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)626ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)883ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Speed Index 1.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Time to Interactive 0.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

94
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 56% 33% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 33% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 78% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)121ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 87% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 56% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 56% 33% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 33% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 78% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)121ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 87% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 4.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
First Contentful Paint 2.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint 2.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Speed Index 2.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Does qrpl.us use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on qrpl.us are reduced by 61%.
qrpl.us use gzip compression.
Original size: 3.24 KB
Compressed size: 1.24 KB
File reduced by: 2 KB (61%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  UNKNOWN

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. qrpl.us supports HTTPS.
 qrpl.us supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: qrpl.us
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: GeoTrust Global TLS RSA4096 SHA256 2022 CA1
Valid from: Jan 7 00:00:00 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 7 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: GeoTrust Global TLS RSA4096 SHA256 2022 CA1
Organization: "DigiCert, Inc."
Location: US
Issuer: DigiCert Global Root CA
Valid from: May 4 00:00:00 2022 GMT
Valid until: Nov 9 23:59:59 2031 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 qrpl.us does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 07:58:06 GMT
Server: Kestrel
Content-Encoding: gzip
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Request-Context: appId=cid-v1:099d9f76-5fff-41a2-837d-d9b16f138234
X-Frame-Options: DENY
Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'none'
X-HTML-Minification-Powered-By: WebMarkupMin

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 21600
Mname ns-cloud-c1.googledomains.com
Rname cloud-dns-hostmaster.google.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 21600
Retry 3600
Expire 259200
Minimum TTL 300
TXT google-site-verification=aGq9wypwfbvmIhZgoTVsSwt_IE3KjNS0vwAacM_qIdA 300
A 20.206.176.0 19
NS ns-cloud-c3.googledomains.com 3319
NS ns-cloud-c4.googledomains.com 3319
NS ns-cloud-c1.googledomains.com 3319
NS ns-cloud-c2.googledomains.com 3319

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on February 24, 2022 and will expire on February 24, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar GoDaddy.com, LLC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on February 19, 2025.
Domain Created:
2022-02-24
Domain Expires:
2026-02-24
Domain Updated:
2025-02-19
Domain Age:
3 years 4 months
Domain Registrar:
GoDaddy.com, LLC
Domain Owner:
QRPlus
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: qrpl.us
Registry Domain ID: D749BFD3213F146A7B87AFAE604BFE35E-GDREG
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: whois.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2025-02-19T10:00:32Z
Creation Date: 2022-02-24T16:46:49Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-02-24T16:46:49Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: C66E8FAFBFBFB4D5A99EC3FF6505D63C2-GDREG
Registrant Name: Marcelo Cintra
Registrant Organization: QRPlus
Registrant Street: Av Ordem e Progresso, 157 - cj 611
Registrant Street:
Registrant Street:
Registrant City: Sao Paulo
Registrant State/Province: Sao Paulo
Registrant Postal Code: 01141-030
Registrant Country: br
Registrant Phone: +55.1137964118
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: email
Registrant Application Purpose: P1
Registrant Nexus Category: C31/BR
Registry Admin ID: C82D02550B4254BBC92EDD6B92BD1C5FF-GDREG
Admin Name: Marcelo Cintra
Admin Organization: QRPlus
Admin Street: Av Ordem e Progresso, 157 - cj 611
Admin Street:
Admin Street:
Admin City: Sao Paulo
Admin State/Province: Sao Paulo
Admin Postal Code: 01141-030
Admin Country: br
Admin Phone: +55.1137964118
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: email
Admin Application Purpose: P1
Admin Nexus Category: C31/BR
Registry Tech ID: CD18AC3B4ABF44A99BFA9342E796159FE-GDREG
Tech Name: Marcelo Cintra
Tech Organization: QRPlus
Tech Street: Av Ordem e Progresso, 157 - cj 611
Tech Street:
Tech Street:
Tech City: Sao Paulo
Tech State/Province: Sao Paulo
Tech Postal Code: 01141-030
Tech Country: br
Tech Phone: +55.1137964118
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: email
Tech Application Purpose: P1
Tech Nexus Category: C31/BR
Name Server: ns-cloud-c2.googledomains.com
Name Server: ns-cloud-c1.googledomains.com
Name Server: ns-cloud-c4.googledomains.com
Name Server: ns-cloud-c3.googledomains.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-04-06T07:58:46Z