Project.Pm - Info project.pm

project.pm receives about 1,814 unique visitors and 3,629 (2.00 per visitor) page views per day which should earn about $14.81/day from advertising revenue. Estimated site value is $10,808.61. According to Alexa Traffic Rank project.pm is ranked number 1,049,906 in the world and 4.0E-5% of global Internet users visit it. Site is hosted in Chicago, Illinois, 60604, United States and links to network IP address 184.154.108.230. This server supports HTTPS and HTTP/2.

About - project.pm


Technologies used on Website

Font Scripts
Google Font API
Web Servers
LiteSpeed
Programming Languages
PHP
Cache Tools
WP Rocket
CMS
WordPress
Blogs
WordPress
Databases
MySQL

project.pm Profile

Title: Welcome to Project PM - Project Management
Description: Hey ***, thanks for visiting my blog.
Last update was 6 days ago
loader
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not linking to, promoting or affiliated with project.pm in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

How popular is project.pm?

1.8K daily visitors
Is this your site?
Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,814
Monthly Unique Visitors:
43,536
Pages per Visit:
2.00
Daily Pageviews:
3,629
Alexa Rank:
1,049,906 visit alexa
Alexa Reach:
4.0E-5%   (of global internet users)
Avg. visit duration:
n/a
Bounce rate:
n/a
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Alexa Traffic Ranks
Search Traffic

Visitors by country

Currently Not Available

Where do visitors go on this site?

Currently Not Available

Competitive Data

SEMrush
Domain:
  project.pm
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Adwords Keywords:
(Keywords a website is buying in Google AdWords for ads that appear in paid search results)
  0
Adwords Traffic:
(Number of visitors brought to the website via paid search results)
  0
Adwords Cost:
(Estimated budget spent for buying keywords in Google AdWords for ads that appear in paid search results - monthly estimation)
  $0.00

+ Moz Data

Domain Authority:
  n/a
Page Authority:
  n/a
MozRank:
  n/a

+ How socially engaged is project.pm?

Facebook:
  0
Google +:
  0
Linkedin:
  0
Stumbles:
  0
Buffer:
  0
Pins:
  0

+ Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a site for a specific platform.

Desktop summary

Root domain:
project.pm
Region:
(The Ad Standard region to which this site has been assigned.)
Pending
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed


Mobile summary

Region:
(The Ad Standard region to which this site has been assigned.)
Pending
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

+ Abusive Experience Report

Root domain:
project.pm
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

+ How much project.pm can earn?

Daily Revenue:
$14.81
Monthly Revenue:
$444.30
Yearly Revenue:
$5,405.65
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

Currently Not Available

How much money do project.pm lose due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
n/a
Monthly Revenue Loss:
n/a
Yearly Revenue Loss:
n/a
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
n/a
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
n/a
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
n/a
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily revenue loss by country

Currently Not Available

How much is project.pm worth?

Website Value:
$10,808.61

+ Where is project.pm hosted?

Server IP:
184.154.108.230
ASN:
AS32475 
ISP:
SingleHop, Inc. 
Server Location:
Chicago
Illinois, IL
60604
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 184.154.108.230

+ How fast does project.pm load?

Average Load Time:
n/a ms n/a % of sites are slower

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.7s 23% of loads for this page have a fast (<1s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 23% 55% of loads for this page have an average (1s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 55% 21% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21%
First Input Delay (FID)24ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.7s 23% of loads for this page have a fast (<1s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 23% 55% of loads for this page have an average (1s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 55% 21% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21%
First Input Delay (FID)24ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%

Lab Data

Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task. Learn more.
Time to Interactive 0.6 s
Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more.
Estimated Input Latency 10 ms
Estimated Input Latency is an estimate of how long your app takes to respond to user input, in milliseconds, during the busiest 5s window of page load. If your latency is higher than 50 ms, users may perceive your app as laggy. Learn more.
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
Speed Index 0.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more.
First CPU Idle 0.6 s
First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. Learn more.
First Contentful Paint 0.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more.
Performance budget
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more.
First Meaningful Paint 0.6 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more.

Screenshot Thumbnails

This is what the load of your site looked like.

Network Requests
Lists the network requests that were made during page load.

URL
Start TimeEnd TimeTransfer SizeResource SizeStatus CodeMIME TypeResource Type
http://project.pm/
0 ms80 ms0 KB0 KB302text/html
https://project.pm/
81 ms199 ms18 KB102 KB200text/htmlDocument
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/min/1/6cc3ed7aac190c37a73691a5843d3b9c.css
213 ms447 ms59 KB275 KB200text/cssStylesheet
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Poppins%3A400%2C%2C600%7COswald%3A500%2C%2C400%7CBaloo+Da%3A400&display=fallback&ver=2.3.0
214 ms234 ms2 KB7 KB200text/cssStylesheet
https://project.pm/wp-content/themes/astra/assets/fonts/astra.woff
214 ms346 ms4 KB3 KB200font/woffFont
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/busting/1/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-1.12.4-wp.js
216 ms383 ms33 KB95 KB200application/javascriptScript
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-127877378-10
217 ms259 ms29 KB74 KB200application/javascriptScript
https://project.pm/wp-content/plugins/wp-rocket/assets/js/lazyload/12.0/lazyload.min.js
227 ms375 ms2 KB5 KB200application/javascriptScript
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/min/1/ec141d845fef0c6b173ece714650369b.js
266 ms493 ms56 KB273 KB200application/javascriptScript
data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20300%2058'%3E%3C/sv
422 ms422 ms0 KB0 KB200image/svg+xmlImage
data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3
424 ms424 ms0 KB0 KB200image/svg+xmlImage
https://project.pm/
442 ms539 ms18 KB64 KB200text/htmlImage
https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/poppins/v9/pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlFQ.woff2
448 ms452 ms8 KB8 KB200font/woff2Font
https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/poppins/v9/pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfecg.woff2
449 ms453 ms8 KB8 KB200font/woff2Font
https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/oswald/v30/TK3iWkUHHAIjg752GT8G.woff2
450 ms454 ms31 KB31 KB200font/woff2Font
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js
495 ms502 ms18 KB44 KB200text/javascriptScript
https://project.pm/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Logo-fo-Project-e1580059015834.png
528 ms582 ms10 KB10 KB200image/pngImage
https://www.google-analytics.com/r/collect?v=1&_v=j81&a=914233176&t=pageview&_s=1&dl=https%3A%2F%2Fproject.pm%2F&ul=en-us&de=UTF-8&dt=Welcome%20to%20Project%20PM%20-%20Project%20Management&sd=24-bit&sr=800x600&vp=1350x940&je=0&_u=IEBAAUAB~&jid=1525261234&gjid=983663276&cid=805220291.1581727881&tid=UA-127877378-10&_gid=899536930.1581727881&_r=1>m=2ou250&z=1916397148
692 ms697 ms1 KB0 KB200image/gifImage
https://project.pm/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/EVM-Featured-Image-e1580058974191.jpg
703 ms738 ms15 KB14 KB200image/jpegImage
https://project.pm/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Statement-of-Work-e1580058872103.jpg
703 ms779 ms18 KB18 KB200image/jpegImage
https://project.pm/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/To-Complete-Performance-Index-e1580058939420.jpg
703 ms794 ms15 KB15 KB200image/jpegImage
https://project.pm/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Project-Product-Life-Cycles-e1580058908398.jpg
703 ms741 ms13 KB12 KB200image/jpegImage
Uses efficient cache policy on static assets - 1 resource found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more.

URL
Cache TTLSize
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js
7200000 ms18 KB
Minimize third-party usage - Third-party code blocked the main thread for 0 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn more.

Third-Party
SizeMain-Thread Blocking Time
29 KB0 ms
19 KB0 ms
Tasks
Lists the toplevel main thread tasks that executed during page load.

Start Time
End Time
232 ms
9 ms
244 ms
9 ms
418 ms
35 ms
453 ms
5 ms
458 ms
47 ms
514 ms
10 ms
528 ms
23 ms
557 ms
10 ms
568 ms
35 ms
604 ms
88 ms
692 ms
29 ms
JavaScript execution time - 0.1 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn more.

URL
Total CPU TimeScript EvaluationScript Parse
Other
227 ms13 ms1 ms
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/busting/1/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-1.12.4-wp.js
92 ms61 ms2 ms
Properly size images - Potential savings of 7 KB
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
https://project.pm/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Logo-fo-Project-e1580059015834.png
10 KB7 KB
Remove unused CSS - Potential savings of 56 KB
Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/min/1/6cc3ed7aac190c37a73691a5843d3b9c.css
59 KB56 KB
Avoids enormous network payloads - Total size was 358 KB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn more.

URL
Size
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/min/1/6cc3ed7aac190c37a73691a5843d3b9c.css
59 KB
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/min/1/ec141d845fef0c6b173ece714650369b.js
56 KB
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/busting/1/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-1.12.4-wp.js
33 KB
https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/oswald/v30/TK3iWkUHHAIjg752GT8G.woff2
31 KB
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-127877378-10
29 KB
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js
18 KB
https://project.pm/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Statement-of-Work-e1580058872103.jpg
18 KB
https://project.pm/
18 KB
https://project.pm/
18 KB
https://project.pm/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/To-Complete-Performance-Index-e1580058939420.jpg
15 KB
Minimizes main-thread work - 0.4 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn more.

Category
Time Spent
Script Evaluation
143 ms
Style & Layout
140 ms
Other
59 ms
Rendering
31 ms
Parse HTML & CSS
24 ms
Script Parsing & Compilation
15 ms
Garbage Collection
0 ms
Avoids an excessive DOM size - 371 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow). Learn more.

Statistic
ElementValue
Total DOM Elements
371
Maximum DOM Depth
19
Maximum Child Elements
16
Avoid multiple page redirects - Potential savings of 1,010 ms
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn more.

URL
Time Spent
(Initial: http://project.pm/)
0
https://project.pm/
1010
Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small - 22 requests • 358 KB
To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file. Learn more.

Resource Type
RequestsTransfer Size
Total
22358 KB
Script
5138 KB
Image
989 KB
Stylesheet
261 KB
Font
452 KB
Document
118 KB
Other
10 KB
Media
00 KB
Third-party
997 KB
Eliminate render-blocking resources - Potential savings of 90 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/busting/1/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-1.12.4-wp.js
33 KB310
Enable text compression
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. Learn more.

Efficiently encode images
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. Learn more.

Network Round Trip Times - 0 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance. Learn more.

All text remains visible during webfont loads
Leverage the font-display CSS feature to ensure text is user-visible while webfonts are loading. Learn more.

Preconnect to required origins
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn more.

Minify CSS
Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes. Learn more.

Defer offscreen images
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. Learn more.

Server Backend Latencies - 0 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance. Learn more.

Serve images in next-gen formats
Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption. Learn more.

Avoid chaining critical requests - 4 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Learn more.

Preload key requests
Consider using `` to prioritize fetching resources that are currently requested later in page load. Learn more.

Minify JavaScript
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn more.

User Timing marks and measures
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences. Learn more.

Use video formats for animated content
Large GIFs are inefficient for delivering animated content. Consider using MPEG4/WebM videos for animations and PNG/WebP for static images instead of GIF to save network bytes. Learn more.

Server response times are low (TTFB) - Root document took 120 ms
Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response. Learn more.


Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

89
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.5s 23% of loads for this page have a fast (<1s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18% 48% of loads for this page have an average (1s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 48% 33% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 33%
First Input Delay (FID)234ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 86% 11% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 11% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.5s 18% of loads for this page have a fast (<1s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18% 48% of loads for this page have an average (1s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 48% 33% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 33%
First Input Delay (FID)234ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 86% 11% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 11% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 2%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint 3.0 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more.
Max Potential First Input Delay 150 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task. Learn more.
Time to Interactive 4.0 s
Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more.
Total Blocking Time 150 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
First Contentful Paint (3G) 5079 ms
First Contentful Paint 3G marks the time at which the first text or image is painted while on a 3G network. Learn more.
Estimated Input Latency 10 ms
Estimated Input Latency is an estimate of how long your app takes to respond to user input, in milliseconds, during the busiest 5s window of page load. If your latency is higher than 50 ms, users may perceive your app as laggy. Learn more.
Speed Index 2.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more.
First CPU Idle 3.6 s
First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. Learn more.
First Contentful Paint 2.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more.
Performance budget
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more.

Screenshot Thumbnails

This is what the load of your site looked like.

Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small - 19 requests • 306 KB
To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file. Learn more.

Resource Type
RequestsTransfer Size
Total
19306 KB
Script
5138 KB
Stylesheet
261 KB
Font
445 KB
Image
643 KB
Document
118 KB
Other
10 KB
Media
00 KB
Third-party
991 KB
Eliminate render-blocking resources - Potential savings of 410 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/busting/1/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-1.12.4-wp.js
33 KB1380
Network Requests
Lists the network requests that were made during page load.

URL
Start TimeEnd TimeTransfer SizeResource SizeStatus CodeMIME TypeResource Type
http://project.pm/
0 ms153 ms0 KB0 KB302text/html
https://project.pm/
154 ms251 ms18 KB102 KB200text/htmlDocument
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/min/1/6cc3ed7aac190c37a73691a5843d3b9c.css
265 ms458 ms59 KB275 KB200text/cssStylesheet
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Poppins%3A400%2C%2C600%7COswald%3A500%2C%2C400%7CBaloo+Da%3A400&display=fallback&ver=2.3.0
265 ms284 ms2 KB8 KB200text/cssStylesheet
https://project.pm/wp-content/themes/astra/assets/fonts/astra.woff
266 ms304 ms4 KB3 KB200font/woffFont
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/busting/1/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-1.12.4-wp.js
268 ms409 ms33 KB95 KB200application/javascriptScript
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-127877378-10
268 ms315 ms29 KB74 KB200application/javascriptScript
https://project.pm/wp-content/plugins/wp-rocket/assets/js/lazyload/12.0/lazyload.min.js
277 ms386 ms2 KB5 KB200application/javascriptScript
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/min/1/ec141d845fef0c6b173ece714650369b.js
322 ms476 ms56 KB273 KB200application/javascriptScript
data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20300%2058'%3E%3C/sv
453 ms453 ms0 KB0 KB200image/svg+xmlImage
data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3
454 ms455 ms0 KB0 KB200image/svg+xmlImage
https://project.pm/
469 ms612 ms18 KB64 KB200text/htmlImage
https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/oswald/v30/TK3iWkUHHAIjg752GT8Gl-1PKw.woff2
471 ms474 ms25 KB25 KB200font/woff2Font
https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/poppins/v9/pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfecnFHGPc.woff2
474 ms477 ms8 KB8 KB200font/woff2Font
https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/poppins/v9/pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlFd2JQEk.woff2
475 ms479 ms8 KB8 KB200font/woff2Font
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js
514 ms519 ms18 KB44 KB200text/javascriptScript
https://project.pm/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Logo-fo-Project-e1580059015834.png
614 ms762 ms10 KB10 KB200image/pngImage
https://project.pm/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/EVM-Featured-Image-e1580058974191.jpg
614 ms689 ms15 KB14 KB200image/jpegImage
https://www.google-analytics.com/r/collect?v=1&_v=j81&a=876902507&t=pageview&_s=1&dl=https%3A%2F%2Fproject.pm%2F&ul=en-us&de=UTF-8&dt=Welcome%20to%20Project%20PM%20-%20Project%20Management&sd=24-bit&sr=412x660&vp=412x660&je=0&_u=IEBAAUAB~&jid=1945783503&gjid=879668199&cid=613890920.1581727874&tid=UA-127877378-10&_gid=621736195.1581727874&_r=1>m=2ou250&z=890691130
672 ms677 ms1 KB0 KB200image/gifImage
Uses efficient cache policy on static assets - 1 resource found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more.

URL
Cache TTLSize
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js
7200000 ms18 KB
Minimize third-party usage - Third-party code blocked the main thread for 50 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn more.

Third-Party
SizeMain-Thread Blocking Time
19 KB46 ms
29 KB0 ms
Tasks
Lists the toplevel main thread tasks that executed during page load.

Start Time
End Time
277 ms
9 ms
289 ms
8 ms
438 ms
39 ms
478 ms
6 ms
484 ms
33 ms
527 ms
10 ms
537 ms
9 ms
551 ms
76 ms
639 ms
9 ms
648 ms
47 ms
726 ms
7 ms
1159 ms
6 ms
JavaScript execution time - 0.6 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn more.

URL
Total CPU TimeScript EvaluationScript Parse
Other
791 ms55 ms4 ms
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/busting/1/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-1.12.4-wp.js
321 ms245 ms9 ms
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js
184 ms81 ms5 ms
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/min/1/ec141d845fef0c6b173ece714650369b.js
153 ms112 ms25 ms
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-127877378-10
70 ms60 ms10 ms
Remove unused CSS - Potential savings of 56 KB
Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity. Learn more.

URL
SizePotential Savings
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/min/1/6cc3ed7aac190c37a73691a5843d3b9c.css
59 KB56 KB
Avoids enormous network payloads - Total size was 306 KB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn more.

URL
Size
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/min/1/6cc3ed7aac190c37a73691a5843d3b9c.css
59 KB
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/min/1/ec141d845fef0c6b173ece714650369b.js
56 KB
https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/busting/1/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-1.12.4-wp.js
33 KB
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-127877378-10
29 KB
https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/oswald/v30/TK3iWkUHHAIjg752GT8Gl-1PKw.woff2
25 KB
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js
18 KB
https://project.pm/
18 KB
https://project.pm/
18 KB
https://project.pm/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/EVM-Featured-Image-e1580058974191.jpg
15 KB
https://project.pm/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Logo-fo-Project-e1580059015834.png
10 KB
Minimizes main-thread work - 1.6 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn more.

Category
Time Spent
Script Evaluation
575 ms
Style & Layout
451 ms
Other
233 ms
Rendering
174 ms
Parse HTML & CSS
88 ms
Script Parsing & Compilation
62 ms
Avoids an excessive DOM size - 371 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow). Learn more.

Statistic
ElementValue
Total DOM Elements
371
Maximum DOM Depth
19
Maximum Child Elements
16
Avoid multiple page redirects - Potential savings of 3,960 ms
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn more.

URL
Time Spent
(Initial: http://project.pm/)
0
https://project.pm/
3960
Use video formats for animated content
Large GIFs are inefficient for delivering animated content. Consider using MPEG4/WebM videos for animations and PNG/WebP for static images instead of GIF to save network bytes. Learn more.

Server response times are low (TTFB) - Root document took 100 ms
Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response. Learn more.

Efficiently encode images
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. Learn more.

Enable text compression
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. Learn more.

Network Round Trip Times - 0 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance. Learn more.

All text remains visible during webfont loads
Leverage the font-display CSS feature to ensure text is user-visible while webfonts are loading. Learn more.

Preconnect to required origins
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn more.

Minify CSS
Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes. Learn more.

Defer offscreen images
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. Learn more.

Server Backend Latencies - 0 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance. Learn more.

Properly size images
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. Learn more.

Serve images in next-gen formats
Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption. Learn more.

Avoid chaining critical requests - 4 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Learn more.

Preload key requests
Consider using `` to prioritize fetching resources that are currently requested later in page load. Learn more.

Minify JavaScript
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn more.

User Timing marks and measures
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences. Learn more.

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - v2

Suggestions Summary

Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 1 blocking script resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://project.pm/wp-content/cache/busting/1/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-1.12.4-wp.js

Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-127877378-10 (15 minutes)
https://www.google-***ytics.com/***ytics.js (2 hours)

Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 1.5KiB (16% reduction).

Compressing https://project.pm/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Logo-fo-Project-e1580059015834.png could save 1.5KiB (16% reduction).
Avoid landing page redirects
Your page has no redirects. Learn more about avoiding landing page redirects.
Avoid plugins
Your page does not appear to use plugins, which would prevent content from being usable on many platforms. Learn more about the importance of avoiding plugins.
Configure the viewport
Your page specifies a viewport matching the device's size, which allows it to render properly on all devices. Learn more about configuring viewports.
Enable compression
You have compression enabled. Learn more about enabling compression.
Reduce server response time
Your server responded quickly. Learn more about server response time optimization.
Minify CSS
Your CSS is minified. Learn more about minifying CSS.
Minify HTML
Your HTML is minified. Learn more about minifying HTML.
Minify JavaScript
Your JavaScript content is minified. Learn more about minifying JavaScript.
Prioritize visible content
You have the above-the-fold content properly prioritized. Learn more about prioritizing visible content.
Size content to viewport
The contents of your page fit within the viewport. Learn more about sizing content to the viewport.
Size tap targets appropriately
All of your page's links/buttons are large enough for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Learn more about sizing tap targets appropriately.
Use legible font sizes
The text on your page is legible. Learn more about using legible font sizes.
Download optimized image, JavaScript, and CSS resources for this page.

+ Does project.pm use compression?

project.pm use br compression.
Original size: 101.98 KB
Compressed size: 17.43 KB
File reduced by: 84.55 KB (82%)

+ Google Safe Browsing

This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

Trustworthiness:
  n/a
Vendor reliability:
  n/a
Privacy:
  n/a
Child safety:
  n/a

+ SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

project.pm supports HTTPS
loader
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: project.pm
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Let's Encrypt Authority X3
Valid from: Jan 19 14:29:29 2020 GMT
Valid until: Apr 18 14:29:29 2020 GMT
Authority:
Keysize:

+ Verify HTTP/2 Support

project.pm supports HTTP/2
loader
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

+ Site Categories (dmoz)

Currently Not Available

+ Http Header

Content-Type: text/html
Content-Length: 593
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 00:51:04 GMT
Server: LiteSpeed
Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate, max-age=0
Location: https://project.pm/
Vary: User-Agent,Accept-Encoding
Connection: Keep-Alive

HTTP/2 200 
x-powered-by: PHP/7.4.2
last-modified: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:00:14 GMT
cache-control: public, max-age=0
expires: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 00:51:04 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
content-encoding: br
vary: Accept-Encoding,User-Agent,Accept-Encoding
date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 00:51:04 GMT
server: LiteSpeed
alt-svc: quic=":443"; ma=2592000; v="35,39,43,44"

+ DNS Lookup

Type Ip Target TTL
A 184.154.108.230 3600
SOA 3600
Mname ns1.c02.tmdcloud.com
Rname sn.tmdhosting.net
Serial Number 2019101400
Refresh 3600
Retry 1800
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 0
MX mx2.tmdhosting.com 3600
MX mx1.tmdhosting.com 3600
TXT 3600
NS ns1.c02.tmdcloud.com 3579
NS ns2.c02.tmdcloud.com 3579

+ Whois Lookup

Domain Created:
2018-12-30
Domain Age:
1 years 1 months 15 days  
WhoIs:
 

whois lookup at whois.nic.pm...
%%
%% This is the AFNIC Whois server.
%%
%% complete date format : YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ
%% short date format : DD/MM
%% version : FRNIC-2.5
%%
%% Rights restricted by copyright.
%% See https://www.afnic.fr/en/products-and-services/services/whois/whois-special-notice/
%%
%% Use '-h' option to obtain more information about this service.
%%
%% [67.212.187.106 REQUEST] >> project.pm
%%
%% RL Net [##########] - RL IP [#########.]
%%

domain: project.pm
status: ACTIVE
hold: NO
holder-c: TL1740-FRNIC
admin-c: TL1740-FRNIC
tech-c: TL1740-FRNIC
zone-c: NFC1-FRNIC
nsl-id: NSL297676-FRNIC
registrar: INSTRA CORPORATION PTY LTD
Expiry Date: 2020-12-30T21:14:49Z
created: 2018-12-30T21:14:49Z
last-update: 2019-10-31T09:41:21Z
source: FRNIC

ns-list: NSL297676-FRNIC
nserver: ns1.c02.tmdcloud.com
nserver: ns2.c02.tmdcloud.com
source: FRNIC

registrar: INSTRA CORPORATION PTY LTD
type: Isp Option 1
address: Level 1
address: 222-225 Beach Road
address: 3195 MORDIALLOC, VICTORIA
country: AU
phone: +61 3 9783 1800
fax-no: +61 3 9783 6844
e-mail: email
website: http://www.instra.com
anonymous: NO
registered: 2007-10-23T12:00:00Z
source: FRNIC

nic-hdl: TL1740-FRNIC
type: ORGANIZATION
contact: DOMAIN DIRECTORS
address: Domain Directors France (SARL)
address: 10, rue des Carmes
address: 17000 la Rochelle
country: FR
phone: +33 1 76 60 71 01
e-mail: email
registrar: INSTRA CORPORATION PTY LTD
changed: 2016-06-15T15:21:44Z email
anonymous: NO
obsoleted: NO
eligstatus: ok
eligsource: REGISTRY
eligdate: 2016-06-15T15:21:44Z
reachmedia: phone
reachstatus: ok
reachsource: REGISTRY
reachdate: 2016-06-15T15:21:44Z
source: FRNIC

nic-hdl: TL1740-FRNIC
type: ORGANIZATION
contact: DOMAIN DIRECTORS
address: Domain Directors France (SARL)
address: 10, rue des Carmes
address: 17000 la Rochelle
country: FR
phone: +33 1 76 60 71 01
e-mail: email
registrar: INSTRA CORPORATION PTY LTD
changed: 2016-06-15T15:21:44Z email
anonymous: NO
obsoleted: NO
eligstatus: ok
eligsource: REGISTRY
eligdate: 2016-06-15T15:21:44Z
reachmedia: phone
reachstatus: ok
reachsource: REGISTRY
reachdate: 2016-06-15T15:21:44Z
source: FRNIC

nic-hdl: TL1740-FRNIC
type: ORGANIZATION
contact: DOMAIN DIRECTORS
address: Domain Directors France (SARL)
address: 10, rue des Carmes
address: 17000 la Rochelle
country: FR
phone: +33 1 76 60 71 01
e-mail: email
registrar: INSTRA CORPORATION PTY LTD
changed: 2016-06-15T15:21:44Z email
anonymous: NO
obsoleted: NO
eligstatus: ok
eligsource: REGISTRY
eligdate: 2016-06-15T15:21:44Z
reachmedia: phone
reachstatus: ok
reachsource: REGISTRY
reachdate: 2016-06-15T15:21:44Z
source: FRNIC
Last update was 6 days ago
loader
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not linking to, promoting or affiliated with project.pm in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Recently Analyzed Sites

accountingbox.nl
15 secs
bigbreak.in
15 secs
hct.ac.ae
30 secs
hdencoders.com
58 secs
bigbo***nanny.com
1 min
hd.tamilplay.com
1 min
big******.club
2 mins
bigbashlivestreaming.com
3 mins
hahasports.net
3 mins
bigbangmedia.in
4 mins
WHAT WE RECOMMEND:
We are using the world's No. 1 Marketing Tool to grow our website. Activate your FREE trial today!

BrowserExtension

Install HypeStat extension in your browser to see statistics and technologies used with one click.

Hide/Remove your site data

• Use Show/Hide ESTIMATED data form to hide (Website worth, Daily ads revenue, Daily Visits, Daily Pageviews)
• Use Show/Hide WHOIS data form to hide whois data
• Use Remove form to remove all data
• If you have any problem with REMOVE/HIDE your data just drop an email at support (at) hypestat.com and we will remove/hide your site data manualy.
Make custom Widget for your website
Get the code now!
project.pm widget