privacybadger.org Privacybadger.org

   
Privacy Badger

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Privacybadger.org?

• Privacybadger.org ranks #1,228,297 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Privacybadger.org?

• 9.26E-5% of global Internet users visit Privacybadger.org

How many people visit Privacybadger.org each day?

• Privacybadger.org receives approximately 4.6K visitors and 6,134 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Privacybadger.org receive most of its visitors from?

• Privacybadger.org is mostly visited by people located in United States,France,Germany.

How much Privacybadger.org can earn?

• Privacybadger.org should earn about $22.73/day from advertising revenue.

What is Privacybadger.org estimated value?

• Estimated value of Privacybadger.org is $23,117.65.

What IP addresses does Privacybadger.org resolve to?

• Privacybadger.org resolves to the IP addresses 173.239.79.206.

Where are Privacybadger.org servers located in?

• Privacybadger.org has servers located in San Francisco, California, 94109, United States.

privacybadger.org Profile

Title: Privacy Badger
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Other Computers Electronics and Technology
About: Privacy Badger is a browser extension developed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) aimed at enhancing user privacy and security while browsing the web. It automatically blocks trackers that monitor your online activities without your consent. Unlike traditional ad blockers, Privacy Badger learns and improves over time by detecting tracking behaviors and subsequently blocking them, rather than relying on predefined lists. The extension is designed for ease of use and requires minimal configuration from the user. It works silently in the background, identifying and mitigating threats to privacy by preventing tracking scripts, social media buttons, and other tools that could potentially collect user data across different sites. Privacy Badger is available for major browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Opera, making it a versatile choice for users concerned about web privacy and data security. In addition to blocking trackers, Privacy Badger also supports initiatives aimed at promoting a healthier internet ecosystem. For example, it encourages websites to respect Do Not Track signals and offers tools for developers to comply with user privacy preferences, contributing to a broader culture of online respect for personal data. Overall, Privacy Badger represents a robust solution for individuals looking to safeguard their personal information from third-party tracking and improve their overall online privacy.
*This text is generated by artificial intelligence and may not be accurate. Edit Site Info

What technologies does privacybadger.org use?

These are the technologies used at privacybadger.org. privacybadger.org has a total of 3 technologies installed in 4 different categories.
Static Site Generator
Hugo Hugo
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph

privacybadger.org Traffic Analysis

Privacybadger.org is ranked #1,228,297 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 4.6K visitors daily, generating a total of 6.1K pageviews. This equates to about 138.3K monthly visitors. Privacybadger.org traffic has increased by 42.16% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors4.6K
42.85%
Monthly Visits138.3K
42.16%
Pages per Visit1.34
16.64%
Visit duration00:12
84.83%
Bounce Rate55.46%
32.75%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
4,564
Monthly Visits:
138,289
Pages per Visit:
1.34
Daily Pageviews:
6,134
Avg. visit duration:
00:12
Bounce rate:
55.46%
Global Reach:
9.26E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
172,953
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
146,782
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
135,560
HypeRank:
1,228,297
SEMrush Rank:
518,896
SimilarWeb Rank:
348,470
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
58.95%
Referral:
29.55%
Search:
10.57%
Social:
0.91%
Paid:
0.02%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
69.34%
Mobile:
30.66%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

138.5K
DEC
97.3K
JAN
138.3K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 32.42%
 
France 7.21%
 
Germany 5.89%
 
United Kingdom 4.59%
 
Russian Federation 3.88%

Where do visitors go on privacybadger.org?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
privacybadger.org
100.00%100.00%1.0

Which sites are competitors to privacybadger.org?

Websites similar to privacybadger.org are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 92 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with privacybadger.org in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
9
Bing Index:
125
Baidu Index:
3

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  privacybadger.org
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  518,896
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  12,505
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  2,806
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $3,657.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $22.7 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $681.9 and annual gross revenue of approximately $8.3K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $23.1K.

How much would privacybadger.org make?

Daily Revenue:
$22.73
Monthly Revenue:
$681.90
Yearly Revenue:
$8,296.45
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 1,989$9.61
 
United Kingdom 281$0.75
 
Germany 361$0.51
 
France 442$0.26
 
Russian Federation 238$0.10

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$2.03
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$60.92
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$741.14
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
571
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
17,123
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
208,325

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 358$1.73
 
Germany 105$0.15
 
United Kingdom 45$0.12
 
France 49$0.03
 
Russian Federation 14$0.01

How much is privacybadger.org worth?

Website Value:
$23.1K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
privacybadger.org
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
privacybadger.org
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
privacybadger.org
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is privacybadger.org hosted? ▼

Privacybadger.org may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
173.239.79.206
ASN:
AS32354 
ISP:
Unwired 
Server Location:
San Francisco
California, CA
94109
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 173.239.79.206

How fast does privacybadger.org load? ▼

The average loading time of privacybadger.org is 315 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 81.
Average Load Time:
315 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)4ms 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 82% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 10% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)882ms 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 69% 26% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 26% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 84% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)18ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 85% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)3ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 83% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)867ms 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 70% 25% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 25% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 84% 11% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)18ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 86% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 0.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint 0.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 0.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 0.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

81
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)771ms 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 76% 19% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)96ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)762ms 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 76% 19% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)96ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 4.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 20 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 4.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Contentful Paint 2.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 4.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides

Does privacybadger.org use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on privacybadger.org are reduced by %.
privacybadger.org does not use compression.
Original size: 43 KB
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. privacybadger.org has 72 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  72
Safety Confidence:
  6

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. privacybadger.org supports HTTPS.
 privacybadger.org supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: privacybadger.org
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Feb 23 02:46:54 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 24 02:46:53 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 privacybadger.org supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
accept-ranges: bytes
content-type: text/html
date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 19:28:50 GMT
etag: "679c4cd5-ac04"
last-modified: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 04:08:53 GMT
referrer-policy: no-referrer
server: nginx
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-download-options: noopen
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-permitted-cross-domain-policies: none
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
content-length: 44036

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 36000
Mname ns1.eff.org
Rname hostmaster.eff.org
Serial Number 2025010201
Refresh 3600
Retry 15
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 43200
TXT v=spf1 a -all 36000
A 173.239.79.206 35949
NS ns2.eff.org 3549
NS ns1.eff.org 3549
NS ns4.eff.org 3549
CAA mailto:caa@eff.org 36000
CAA letsencrypt.org 36000

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on March 7, 2013 and will expire on March 7, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Gandi SAS. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on February 9, 2025.
Domain Created:
2013-03-07
Domain Expires:
2026-03-07
Domain Updated:
2025-02-09
Domain Age:
12 years 3 months 11 days
Domain Registrar:
Gandi SAS
Domain Owner:
Electronic Frontier Foundation
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: privacybadger.org
Registry Domain ID: 3647e9aaed314317b5face780c5b2961-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: http://whois.gandi.net
Registrar URL: http://www.gandi.net
Updated Date: 2025-02-09T20:49:01Z
Creation Date: 2013-03-07T22:42:20Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-03-07T22:42:20Z
Registrar: Gandi SAS
Registrar IANA ID: 81
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +33.170377661
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant State/Province: CA
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Name Server: ns1.eff.org
Name Server: ns2.eff.org
Name Server: ns4.eff.org
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-17T19:29:41Z