opensourcealternative.to Opensourcealternative.to

   
Open Source Alternatives To Proprietary Software

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Opensourcealternative.to?

• Opensourcealternative.to ranks #752,354 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Opensourcealternative.to?

• 0.0002217% of global Internet users visit Opensourcealternative.to

How many people visit Opensourcealternative.to each day?

• Opensourcealternative.to receives approximately 10.9K visitors and 40,419 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Opensourcealternative.to receive most of its visitors from?

• Opensourcealternative.to is mostly visited by people located in United States,India,Italy.

How much Opensourcealternative.to can earn?

• Opensourcealternative.to should earn about $135.08/day from advertising revenue.

What is Opensourcealternative.to estimated value?

• Estimated value of Opensourcealternative.to is $125,459.44.

What IP addresses does Opensourcealternative.to resolve to?

• Opensourcealternative.to resolves to the IP addresses 2a09:8280:1::45:b144:0, 66.241.125.173.

Where are Opensourcealternative.to servers located in?

• Opensourcealternative.to has servers located in United States.

opensourcealternative.to Profile

Title:Open Source Alternatives To Proprietary Software Description:The world's largest directory for open source software. Discover 500+ popular open source alternatives to proprietary software products. 100% free.
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Programming and Developer Software
Edit Site Info

What technologies does opensourcealternative.to use?

These are the technologies used at opensourcealternative.to. opensourcealternative.to has a total of 6 technologies installed in 6 different categories.
Web Servers
Fly.io Fly.io
Advertising
Google AdSense Google AdSense
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
UI frameworks
Radix UI Radix UI
JavaScript Frameworks
React React

opensourcealternative.to Traffic Analysis

Opensourcealternative.to is ranked #752,354 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 10.9K visitors daily, generating a total of 40.4K pageviews. This equates to about 331.1K monthly visitors. Opensourcealternative.to traffic has decreased by 38.52% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors10.9K
37.28%
Monthly Visits331.1K
38.52%
Pages per Visit3.70
5.25%
Visit duration01:03
47.5%
Bounce Rate43.39%
11.88%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
10,929
Monthly Visits:
331,149
Pages per Visit:
3.70
Daily Pageviews:
40,419
Avg. visit duration:
01:03
Bounce rate:
43.39%
Global Reach:
0.0002217%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
195,802
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
151,121
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
324,623
HypeRank:
752,354
SEMrush Rank:
310,105
SimilarWeb Rank:
114,195
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
48.37%
Referral:
5.12%
Search:
44.00%
Social:
1.97%
Paid:
0.53%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
62.80%
Mobile:
37.20%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

320.4K
FEB
538.6K
MAR
331.1K
APR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 14.25%
 
India 7.49%
 
Italy 6.01%
 
France 4.76%
 
Spain 4.73%

Where do visitors go on opensourcealternative.to?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
opensourcealternative.to
100.00%100.00%2.9

Which sites are competitors to opensourcealternative.to?

Websites similar to opensourcealternative.to are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 20 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with opensourcealternative.to in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
10,200

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  opensourcealternative.to
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  310,105
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  5,537
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  5,260
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $15,881.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $135.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $4.1K and annual gross revenue of approximately $49.3K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $125.5K.

How much would opensourcealternative.to make?

Daily Revenue:
$135.08
Monthly Revenue:
$4,052.40
Yearly Revenue:
$49,304.20
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 5,761$27.83
 
India 3,028$1.15
 
France 1,923$1.12
 
Spain 1,913$0.92
 
Italy 2,430$0.58

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$5.73
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$171.81
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$2,090.39
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
2,873
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
86,187
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
1,048,602

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 1,037$5.01
 
India 848$0.32
 
Spain 363$0.17
 
France 212$0.12
 
Italy 413$0.10

How much is opensourcealternative.to worth?

Website Value:
$125.5K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
opensourcealternative.to
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
opensourcealternative.to
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
opensourcealternative.to
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is opensourcealternative.to hosted? ▼

Opensourcealternative.to may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2a09:8280:1::45:b144:0, 66.241.125.173
ASN:
AS40509 
ISP:
ORANGE CAPITAL, LLC 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 66.241.125.173

How fast does opensourcealternative.to load? ▼

The average loading time of opensourcealternative.to is 1706 ms. The Desktop speed index is 90 and mobile speed index is 63.
Average Load Time:
1706 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

90
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.8s 60% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 60% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15% 24% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 24%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 66% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 66% 25% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 25% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)36ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 83% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 64% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 64% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20% 14% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 79% 15% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)32ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 1.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

63
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.9s 60% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 58% 13% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 27% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.3s 66% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 61% 24% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 24% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)125ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 84% 11% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 11% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.4s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 76% 15% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 15% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 63% 21% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 21% 15% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 76% 16% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 16% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)96ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Lab Data

Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Time to Interactive 7.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 7.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Contentful Paint 4.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Speed Index 5.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric

Does opensourcealternative.to use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on opensourcealternative.to are reduced by 66%.
opensourcealternative.to use gzip compression.
Original size: 145.54 KB
Compressed size: 48.14 KB
File reduced by: 97.39 KB (66%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. opensourcealternative.to supports HTTPS.
 opensourcealternative.to supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: opensourcealternative.to
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: E5
Valid from: Apr 8 23:28:04 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 7 23:28:03 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: E5
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 opensourcealternative.to supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: gzip
date: Mon, 26 May 2025 22:52:49 GMT
server: Fly/d04dd247 (2025-05-26)
via: 2 fly.io
fly-request-id: 01JW7CRVSCHQ6WT1AM21HX0YAH-ord

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2a09:8280:1::45:b144:0 1736
A 66.241.125.173 1736
NS dns2.registrar-servers.com 86337
NS dns1.registrar-servers.com 86337
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.
WhoIs:
 

Tonic whoisd V1.1
opensourcealternative dns1.registrar-servers.com
opensourcealternative dns2.registrar-servers.com