odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl

   
Odżywiaj się zdrowo Proste Przepisy

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl?

• 5.97E-5% of global Internet users visit Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl

How many people visit Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl each day?

• Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl receives approximately 2.9K visitors and 4,216 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl receive most of its visitors from?

• Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl is mostly visited by people located in Poland,Germany,United Kingdom.

How much Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl can earn?

• Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl should earn about $2.22/day from advertising revenue.

What is Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl estimated value?

• Estimated value of Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl is $2,029.37.

What IP addresses does Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl resolve to?

• Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl resolves to the IP addresses 195.78.66.97.

Where are Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl servers located in?

• Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl has servers located in Konstancin-Jeziorna, Mazovia, 05-520, Poland.

odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl Profile

Title:Odżywiaj się zdrowo Proste Przepisy Description:Moją „misją” jest inspirowanie i motywowanie. Chcę Ci pokazać, że gotowanie zdrowych potraw może być proste i przyjemne.
Category:Food and Drink / Cooking and Recipes
Edit Site Info

What technologies does odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl use?

These are the technologies used at odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl. odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl has a total of 11 technologies installed in 12 different categories.
WordPress plugins
Autoptimize Autoptimize
WooCommerce WooCommerce
Performance
Autoptimize Autoptimize
Priority Hints Priority Hints
WordPress themes
GeneratePress GeneratePress
Tag Managers
Google Tag Manager Google Tag Manager
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Web Servers
LiteSpeed LiteSpeed
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
Ecommerce
WooCommerce WooCommerce
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Databases
MySQL MySQL

odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 2.9K visitors daily, generating a total of 4.2K pageviews. This equates to about 89.2K monthly visitors. Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl traffic has increased by 18.42% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors2.9K
22.41%
Monthly Visits89.2K
18.42%
Pages per Visit1.43
12.77%
Visit duration00:15
17.72%
Bounce Rate27.06%
9.77%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
2,944
Monthly Visits:
89,203
Pages per Visit:
1.43
Daily Pageviews:
4,216
Avg. visit duration:
00:15
Bounce rate:
27.06%
Global Reach:
5.97E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
175,746
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
84,785
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
89,226
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
7,028,979
SimilarWeb Rank:
500,568
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
27.37%
Referral:
0%
Search:
71.57%
Social:
1.06%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
11.34%
Mobile:
88.66%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

63.7K
DEC
75.3K
JAN
89.2K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Poland 92.29%
 
Germany 3.71%
 
United Kingdom 3.70%
 
Netherlands 0.30%

Which sites are competitors to odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl?

Websites similar to odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 85 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
3,490

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  7,028,979
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  159
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  13
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $2.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $66.6 and annual gross revenue of approximately $810.3. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $2K.

How much would odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl make?

Daily Revenue:
$2.22
Monthly Revenue:
$66.60
Yearly Revenue:
$810.30
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Poland 3,891$1.56
 
United Kingdom 156$0.42
 
Germany 157$0.22
 
Netherlands 12$0.02

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.65
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$19.44
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$236.56
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
1,356
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
40,695
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
495,121

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Poland 1,284$0.51
 
United Kingdom 25$0.07
 
Germany 45$0.06
 
Netherlands 2$0.00

How much is odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl worth?

Website Value:
$2K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl hosted? ▼

Odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
195.78.66.97
ASN:
AS41079 
ISP:
H88 S.A. 
Server Location:
Konstancin-Jeziorna
Mazovia, 14
05-520
Poland, PL
 

Other sites hosted on 195.78.66.97

How fast does odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl load? ▼

The average loading time of odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl is 2128 ms. The Desktop speed index is 87 and mobile speed index is 70.
Average Load Time:
2128 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

87
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)583ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)719ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)25ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)765ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)5ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 87% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)691ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)901ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)36ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.0s 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 30 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint 1.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Contentful Paint 1.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Speed Index 2.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
Max Potential First Input Delay 80 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

70
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 90% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)677ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 84% 13% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)930ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)135ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 87% 10% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 10% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)993ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 94% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)717ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 80% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)140ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 89% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 9% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 90 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 7.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 3.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 6.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 40 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint 4.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Does odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl are reduced by 81%.
odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl use br compression.
Original size: 123.8 KB
Compressed size: 22.39 KB
File reduced by: 101.41 KB (81%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl supports HTTPS.
 odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Mar 26 18:09:51 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 24 18:09:50 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
x-ua-compatible: IE=edge
expires: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 20:03:03 GMT
cache-control: max-age=3600
x-redirect-by: WordPress
location: https://www.odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl/
content-length: 0
date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 19:03:03 GMT
server: LiteSpeed
vary: User-Agent
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q050=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q046=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q043=":443"; ma=2592000, quic=":443"; ma=2592000; v="43,46"

HTTP/2 200 
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
x-ua-compatible: IE=edge
link: <https://www.odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
content-encoding: br
vary: Accept-Encoding,User-Agent
date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 19:03:04 GMT
server: LiteSpeed
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q050=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q046=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q043=":443"; ma=2592000, quic=":443"; ma=2592000; v="43,46"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 14400
Mname ns1.cyberfolks.pl
Rname hostmaster.odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl
Serial Number 2025032502
Refresh 14400
Retry 3600
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 3600
TXT v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.cyberfolks.pl -all 14400
MX mail.odzywiajsiezdrowo.pl 14400
A 195.78.66.97 14304
NS ns1.cyberfolks.pl 14400
NS ns2.cyberfolks.pl 14400
NS ns3.cyberfolks.pl 14400

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.
WhoIs:
 

request limit exceeded