litrk.ru Litrk.ru

   
Google

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Litrk.ru?

• 2.82E-5% of global Internet users visit Litrk.ru

How many people visit Litrk.ru each day?

• Litrk.ru receives approximately 1.4K visitors and 1,573 page impressions per day.

How much Litrk.ru can earn?

• Litrk.ru should earn about $6.42/day from advertising revenue.

What is Litrk.ru estimated value?

• Estimated value of Litrk.ru is $5,688.88.

What IP addresses does Litrk.ru resolve to?

• Litrk.ru resolves to the IP addresses 95.213.217.162.

Where are Litrk.ru servers located in?

• Litrk.ru has servers located in St Petersburg, St.-Petersburg, 190000, Russia.

litrk.ru Profile

Title:Google
Description:Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what you're looking for.
Category:eCommerce and Shopping / Coupons and Rebates
Edit Site Info

What technologies does litrk.ru use?

These are the technologies used at litrk.ru. litrk.ru has a total of 2 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
Web Servers
Google Web Server Google Web Server
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3

litrk.ru Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 1.4K visitors daily, generating a total of 1.6K pageviews. This equates to about 42.1K monthly visitors. Litrk.ru traffic has increased by 121.34% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1.4K
197.68%
Monthly Visits42.1K
121.34%
Pages per Visit1.13
17.58%
Visit duration00:26
251.22%
Bounce Rate84.69%
17.52%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,388
Monthly Visits:
42,056
Pages per Visit:
1.13
Daily Pageviews:
1,573
Avg. visit duration:
00:26
Bounce rate:
84.69%
Global Reach:
2.82E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
81,422
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
81,148
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
42,500
HypeRank:
n/a
SimilarWeb Rank:
922,719
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
0.61%
Referral:
99.39%
Search:
0%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
4.63%
Mobile:
95.37%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

31.8K
JAN
19K
FEB
42.1K
MAR

Which sites are competitors to litrk.ru?

Websites similar to litrk.ru are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 31 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with litrk.ru in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  litrk.ru
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $6.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $192.6 and annual gross revenue of approximately $2.3K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $5.7K.

How much would litrk.ru make?

Daily Revenue:
$6.42
Monthly Revenue:
$192.60
Yearly Revenue:
$2,343.30
*All earnings values are estimates only.

How much is litrk.ru worth?

Website Value:
$5.7K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
litrk.ru
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
litrk.ru
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
litrk.ru
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is litrk.ru hosted? ▼

Litrk.ru may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
95.213.217.162
ASN:
AS49505 
ISP:
OOO Network of data-centers Selectel 
Server Location:
St Petersburg
St.-Petersburg, SPE
190000
Russia, RU
 

Other sites hosted on 95.213.217.162

How fast does litrk.ru load? ▼

The average loading time of litrk.ru is 1004 ms. The Desktop speed index is 78 and mobile speed index is 80.
Average Load Time:
1004 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

78
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 63% 23% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 23% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)100ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 87% 7% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 7% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 87% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)212ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)404ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)64ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)767ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 360 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 1.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 1.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Time to Interactive 2.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Contentful Paint 1.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Max Potential First Input Delay 210 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

80
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)4ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)553ms 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 84% 11% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.0s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 90% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)250ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 65% 26% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 26% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)273ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)603ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)178ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 78% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 15% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)896ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Time to Interactive 7.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 160 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Contentful Paint 2.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 240 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 3.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Speed Index 2.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric

Does litrk.ru use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on litrk.ru are reduced by 67%.
litrk.ru use gzip compression.
Original size: 52.72 KB
Compressed size: 17.1 KB
File reduced by: 35.62 KB (67%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. litrk.ru supports HTTPS.
 litrk.ru supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.google.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WR2
Valid from: Mar 20 11:20:31 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 12 11:20:30 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WR2
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R1
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: GTS Root R1
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Jun 19 00:00:42 2020 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 litrk.ru supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: nginx
date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:18:43 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
location: https://google.com
last-modified: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:18:43 GMT
cache-control: no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate,post-check=0,pre-check=0
pragma: no-cache
expires: 0
strict-transport-security: max-age=63072000

HTTP/2 301 
location: https://www.google.com/
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
content-security-policy-report-only: object-src 'none';base-uri 'self';script-src 'nonce-tR08H29PqxEBe0lueD3eVA' 'strict-dynamic' 'report-sample' 'unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline' https: http:;report-uri https://csp.withgoogle.com/csp/gws/other-hp
date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:18:43 GMT
expires: Sun, 18 May 2025 10:18:43 GMT
cache-control: public, max-age=2592000
server: gws
content-length: 220
x-xss-protection: 0
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000,h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000

HTTP/2 200 
date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:18:43 GMT
expires: -1
cache-control: private, max-age=0
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
content-security-policy-report-only: object-src 'none';base-uri 'self';script-src 'nonce-GGheyPl0nA8P1sO4tdmArw' 'strict-dynamic' 'report-sample' 'unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline' https: http:;report-uri https://csp.withgoogle.com/csp/gws/other-hp
accept-ch: Sec-CH-Prefers-Color-Scheme
p3p: CP="This is not a P3P policy! See g.co/p3phelp for more info."
content-encoding: gzip
server: gws
content-length: 17513
x-xss-protection: 0
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
set-cookie: AEC=AVcja2cvdkqSFs-NXJSx3IwLm9tMskdRPvwYWJvJJPmCK6Hj3e8QRE5ctA; expires=Wed, 15-Oct-2025 10:18:43 GMT; path=/; domain=.google.com; Secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=lax
set-cookie: NID=523=cE6onrlYIcVO6m7_Cyyv7EbOZ6GYf4tDW7YjzXAn73l4OnbhmOycDN50zlsRgsw-DQR5W5_d3LrUU3k9UnZxp_xsu9iqR5I5h8Em8JwWHQO8iNaEmYKhwiQBEYcadX-vLqHAb51s-JaQGp07fXCAN1kNLKEcHMH6dOxOKpfRt3lT715iWYT9Ge6ycakv1czOvNS2cILM62-oEio6YmejLOqbDbDZP7ZnVjdf74sNF1P3DAQK; expires=Sat, 18-Oct-2025 10:18:43 GMT; path=/; domain=.google.com; HttpOnly
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000,h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 300
Mname ns1.selectel.ru
Rname support.selectel.ru
Serial Number 2021070577
Refresh 10800
Retry 3600
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 300
A 95.213.217.162 244
NS b.ns.selectel.ru 300
NS d.ns.selectel.ru 300
NS a.ns.selectel.ru 300
NS c.ns.selectel.ru 300

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on July 2, 2021 and will expire on July 2, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar REGRU-RU. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on May 19, 2025.
Domain Created:
2021-07-02
Domain Expires:
2025-07-02
Domain Age:
3 years 10 months 17 days
Domain Registrar:
REGRU-RU
WhoIs:
 

% TCI Whois Service. Terms of use:
% https://tcinet.ru/documents/whois_ru_rf.pdf (in Russian)
% https://tcinet.ru/documents/whois_su.pdf (in Russian)

domain:        LITRK.RU
nserver:       ns1.selectel.org.
nserver:       ns2.selectel.org.
nserver:       ns3.selectel.org.
nserver:       ns4.selectel.org.
state:         REGISTERED, DELEGATED, UNVERIFIED
person:        Private Person
registrar:     REGRU-RU
admin-contact: http://www.reg.ru/whois/admin_contact
created:       2021-07-02T15:15:54Z
paid-till:     2025-07-02T15:15:54Z
free-date:     2025-08-02
source:        TCI

Last updated on 2025-04-18T10:18:02Z