linkcleaner.app Linkcleaner.app

   
Link Cleaner

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Linkcleaner.app?

• 1.16E-5% of global Internet users visit Linkcleaner.app

How many people visit Linkcleaner.app each day?

• Linkcleaner.app receives approximately 572 visitors and 1,267 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Linkcleaner.app receive most of its visitors from?

• Linkcleaner.app is mostly visited by people located in United States,United Kingdom,Canada.

How much Linkcleaner.app can earn?

• Linkcleaner.app should earn about $5.33/day from advertising revenue.

What is Linkcleaner.app estimated value?

• Estimated value of Linkcleaner.app is $4,975.51.

What IP addresses does Linkcleaner.app resolve to?

• Linkcleaner.app resolves to the IP addresses 185.199.108.153.

Where are Linkcleaner.app servers located in?

• Linkcleaner.app has servers located in California, United States.

linkcleaner.app Profile

Title:Link Cleaner Description:Link Cleaner is a web app that removes unnecessary junk from links in one click.
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Other Computers Electronics and Technology
Edit Site Info

What technologies does linkcleaner.app use?

These are the technologies used at linkcleaner.app. linkcleaner.app has a total of 9 technologies installed in 7 different categories.
UI frameworks
Bootstrap Bootstrap
CDN
Fastly Fastly
jsDelivr jsDelivr
PaaS
GitHub Pages GitHub Pages
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
PWA PWA
Payment Processors
PayPal PayPal
Analytics
Plausible Plausible
Caching
Varnish Varnish

linkcleaner.app Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 572 visitors daily, generating a total of 1.3K pageviews. This equates to about 17.3K monthly visitors. Linkcleaner.app traffic has increased by 49.69% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors572
16.83%
Monthly Visits17.3K
49.69%
Pages per Visit2.22
21.24%
Visit duration01:14
277.55%
Bounce Rate54.82%
26.07%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
572
Monthly Visits:
17,332
Pages per Visit:
2.22
Daily Pageviews:
1,267
Avg. visit duration:
01:14
Bounce rate:
54.82%
Global Reach:
1.16E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
7,941
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
5,512
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
17,321
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
2,456,880
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,456,620
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
49.31%
Referral:
1.71%
Search:
48.97%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

16.9K
JAN
11.6K
FEB
17.3K
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 66.51%
 
United Kingdom 9.90%
 
Canada 4.81%
 
India 4.51%
 
Philippines 4.16%

Which sites are competitors to linkcleaner.app?

Websites similar to linkcleaner.app are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 62 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with linkcleaner.app in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  linkcleaner.app
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  2,456,880
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  67
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  226
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $157.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $5.3 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $159.9 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.9K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $5K.

How much would linkcleaner.app make?

Daily Revenue:
$5.33
Monthly Revenue:
$159.90
Yearly Revenue:
$1,945.45
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 843$4.07
 
Canada 61$0.37
 
United Kingdom 125$0.34
 
India 57$0.02
 
Philippines 53$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.89
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$26.56
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$323.12
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
207
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
6,200
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
75,435

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 152$0.73
 
Canada 15$0.09
 
United Kingdom 20$0.05
 
India 16$0.01
 
Philippines 4$0.00

How much is linkcleaner.app worth?

Website Value:
$5K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
linkcleaner.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
linkcleaner.app
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
linkcleaner.app
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is linkcleaner.app hosted? ▼

Linkcleaner.app may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
185.199.108.153
ASN:
AS54113 
ISP:
Fastly 
Server Location:
California, CA
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 185.199.108.153

How fast does linkcleaner.app load? ▼

The average loading time of linkcleaner.app is 48 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 91.
Average Load Time:
48 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)542ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 88% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)934ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)66ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)920ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)542ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 88% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)934ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)66ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)920ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 0.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint 0.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 0.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

91
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)637ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 81% 14% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)99ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.1s 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)637ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 81% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)99ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.1s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 2.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 2.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 2.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Time to Interactive 2.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Does linkcleaner.app use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on linkcleaner.app are reduced by 75%.
linkcleaner.app use gzip compression.
Original size: 16.91 KB
Compressed size: 4.19 KB
File reduced by: 12.71 KB (75%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. linkcleaner.app supports HTTPS.
 linkcleaner.app supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: linkcleaner.app
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Feb 27 20:28:42 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 28 20:28:41 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 linkcleaner.app supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: GitHub.com
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
last-modified: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 22:53:55 GMT
access-control-allow-origin: *
etag: W/"67aa8383-43a0"
expires: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:29:54 GMT
cache-control: max-age=600
content-encoding: gzip
x-proxy-cache: MISS
x-github-request-id: 31A3:268586:F114CD4:FD39F08:67FF7639
accept-ranges: bytes
age: 0
date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:54:19 GMT
via: 1.1 varnish
x-served-by: cache-chi-kigq8000063-CHI
x-cache: HIT
x-cache-hits: 0
x-timer: S1744797260.646462,VS0,VE33
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-fastly-request-id: 7545a0942b9a23aee92ca1ab1df9bb5eef61c863
content-length: 4294

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 900
Mname ns1.hover.com
Rname dnsmaster.hover.com
Serial Number 1720469119
Refresh 1800
Retry 900
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 300
TXT google-site-verification=1gFbf5vamVroi_VEz9hhz0hc2iSVd2M948H8NBVomqU 900
MX mx.hover.com.cust.hostedemail.com 900
A 185.199.111.153 858
A 185.199.109.153 858
A 185.199.108.153 858
A 185.199.110.153 858
NS ns2.hover.com 900
NS ns1.hover.com 900