kletterwald-marburg.de Kletterwald-marburg.de

   
Der etwas andere Kletterwald - Kletterwald Marburg

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Kletterwald-marburg.de?

3.0E-7% of global Internet users visit Kletterwald-marburg.de

How many people visit Kletterwald-marburg.de each day?

• Kletterwald-marburg.de receives approximately 17 visitors and 108 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Kletterwald-marburg.de receive most of its visitors from?

• Kletterwald-marburg.de is mostly visited by people located in Germany,Italy.

How much Kletterwald-marburg.de can earn?

• Kletterwald-marburg.de should earn about $0.15/day from advertising revenue.

What is Kletterwald-marburg.de estimated value?

• Estimated value of Kletterwald-marburg.de is $147.09.

What IP addresses does Kletterwald-marburg.de resolve to?

• Kletterwald-marburg.de resolves to the IP addresses 78.46.140.200.

Where are Kletterwald-marburg.de servers located in?

• Kletterwald-marburg.de has servers located in Germany.

kletterwald-marburg.de Profile

Title:Der etwas andere Kletterwald - Kletterwald Marburg

What technologies does kletterwald-marburg.de use?

These are the technologies used at kletterwald-marburg.de. kletterwald-marburg.de has a total of 5 technologies installed in 4 different categories.

kletterwald-marburg.de Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 17 visitors daily, generating a total of 108 pageviews. This equates to about 515.1 monthly visitors.
Daily Visitors17
Monthly Visits515.1
Pages per Visit6.50
Visit duration03:09
Bounce Rate31.58%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
17
Monthly Visits:
515
Pages per Visit:
6.50
Daily Pageviews:
108
Avg. visit duration:
03:09
Bounce rate:
31.58%
Global Reach:
3.0E-7%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
831
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
458
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
508
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
34,309,629
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
81.44%
Referral:
18.56%
Search:
0%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

425
JAN
515.1
FEB
515.1
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Germany 98.16%
 
Italy 1.84%
Last update was 191 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with kletterwald-marburg.de in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
60

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  kletterwald-marburg.de
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  34,309,629
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  1
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $0.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $4.5 and annual gross revenue of approximately $54.8. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $147.1.

How much would kletterwald-marburg.de make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.15
Monthly Revenue:
$4.50
Yearly Revenue:
$54.75
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Germany 106$0.15
 
Italy 2$0.00

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.04
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$1.29
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$15.74
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
31
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
932
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
11,345

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Germany 31$0.04
 
Italy 0$0.00

How much is kletterwald-marburg.de worth?

Website Value:
$147.1

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
kletterwald-marburg.de
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
kletterwald-marburg.de
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
kletterwald-marburg.de
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is kletterwald-marburg.de hosted?

Kletterwald-marburg.de may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
78.46.140.200
ASN:
AS24940 
ISP:
Hetzner Online GmbH 
Server Location:

Germany, DE
 

Other sites hosted on 78.46.140.200

How fast does kletterwald-marburg.de load?

The average loading time of kletterwald-marburg.de is 407 ms. The Desktop speed index is 97 and mobile speed index is 88.
Average Load Time:
407 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

97
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint 0.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 1.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

88
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)621ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 10% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.0s 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)82ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.0s 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)528ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 84% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)820ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)72ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)870ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Time to Interactive 3.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint 3.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Speed Index 4.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 2.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Does kletterwald-marburg.de use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on kletterwald-marburg.de are reduced by 77%.
kletterwald-marburg.de use gzip compression.
Original size: 33.98 KB
Compressed size: 7.73 KB
File reduced by: 26.25 KB (77%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. kletterwald-marburg.de has 61 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  UNKNOWN
Safety Reputations:
  61
Safety Confidence:
  2

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. kletterwald-marburg.de supports HTTPS.
 kletterwald-marburg.de supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: kletterwald-marburg.de
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Encryption Everywhere DV TLS CA - G2
Valid from: Jun 22 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Jun 22 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Encryption Everywhere DV TLS CA - G2
Organization: DigiCert Inc, OU = www.digicert.com
Location: US
Issuer: DigiCert Global Root G2
Valid from: Nov 27 12:46:40 2017 GMT
Valid until: Nov 27 12:46:40 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 kletterwald-marburg.de supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
cache-control: must-revalidate, no-cache, no-store, private
date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 01:05:02 GMT
x-content-type-options: nosniff
referrer-policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade, strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy: interest-cohort=()
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
contao-cache: miss
age: 0
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: gzip
content-length: 7914
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
server: Apache

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.
Domain Updated:
2020-10-23
WhoIs:
 

% Restricted rights.
% 
% Terms and Conditions of Use
% 
% The above data may only be used within the scope of technical or
% administrative necessities of Internet operation or to remedy legal
% problems.
% The use for other purposes, in particular for advertising, is not permitted.
% 
% The DENIC whois service on port 43 doesn't disclose any information concerning
% the domain holder, general request and abuse contact.
% This information can be obtained through use of our web-based whois service
% available at the DENIC website:
% http://www.denic.de/en/domains/whois-service/web-whois.html
% 
% 

Domain: kletterwald-marburg.de
Nserver: ns2.checkdomain.de
Nserver: ns.checkdomain.de
Status: connect
Changed: 2020-10-23T11:21:43+02:00