indenolifant.nl Indenolifant.nl

   

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Indenolifant.nl?

• 1.1E-6% of global Internet users visit Indenolifant.nl

How many people visit Indenolifant.nl each day?

• Indenolifant.nl receives approximately 54 visitors and 56 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Indenolifant.nl receive most of its visitors from?

• Indenolifant.nl is mostly visited by people located in United States,Netherlands,Belgium.

How much Indenolifant.nl can earn?

• Indenolifant.nl should earn about $0.18/day from advertising revenue.

What is Indenolifant.nl estimated value?

• Estimated value of Indenolifant.nl is $180.15.

What IP addresses does Indenolifant.nl resolve to?

• Indenolifant.nl resolves to the IP addresses 46.30.213.189.

Where are Indenolifant.nl servers located in?

• Indenolifant.nl has servers located in Copenhagen, Capital Region, 1510, Denmark.

indenolifant.nl Profile

Edit Site Info

What technologies does indenolifant.nl use?

These are the technologies used at indenolifant.nl. indenolifant.nl has a total of 9 technologies installed in 10 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
jQuery Migrate jQuery Migrate
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Performance
Priority Hints Priority Hints
Caching
Varnish Varnish
Ecommerce
WooCommerce WooCommerce
WordPress plugins
WooCommerce WooCommerce
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Databases
MySQL MySQL

indenolifant.nl Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 54 visitors daily, generating a total of 56 pageviews. This equates to about 1.6K monthly visitors.
Daily Visitors54
Monthly Visits1.6K
Pages per Visit1.03
Visit duration n/a
Bounce Rate41.64%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
54
Monthly Visits:
1,636
Pages per Visit:
1.03
Daily Pageviews:
56
Avg. visit duration:
n/a
Bounce rate:
41.64%
Global Reach:
1.1E-6%
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
1,660
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
35,919,728
SimilarWeb Rank:
9,985,324
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Total Visits Last 3 Months

730
JAN
1.6K
FEB
1.6K
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 48.46%
 
Netherlands 39.91%
 
Belgium 11.63%
Last update was 185 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with indenolifant.nl in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
2,370

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  indenolifant.nl
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  35,919,728
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  1
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $5.4 and annual gross revenue of approximately $65.7. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $180.2.

How much would indenolifant.nl make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.18
Monthly Revenue:
$5.40
Yearly Revenue:
$65.70
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 27$0.13
 
Netherlands 22$0.04
 
Belgium 7$0.00

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.03
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$0.94
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$11.42
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
9
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
284
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
3,455

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 5$0.02
 
Netherlands 4$0.01
 
Belgium 1$0.00

How much is indenolifant.nl worth?

Website Value:
$180.2

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
indenolifant.nl
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
indenolifant.nl
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
indenolifant.nl
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is indenolifant.nl hosted? ▼

Indenolifant.nl may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
46.30.213.189
ASN:
AS51468 
ISP:
One.com A/S 
Server Location:
Copenhagen
Capital Region, 84
1510
Denmark, DK
 

Other sites hosted on 46.30.213.189

How fast does indenolifant.nl load? ▼

The average loading time of indenolifant.nl is 1145 ms. The Desktop speed index is 94 and mobile speed index is 75.
Average Load Time:
1145 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

94
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Speed Index 2.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 1.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 0.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

75
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 3.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 4.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Time to Interactive 4.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint 4.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Does indenolifant.nl use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on indenolifant.nl are reduced by 82%.
indenolifant.nl use gzip compression.
Original size: 78.25 KB
Compressed size: 13.7 KB
File reduced by: 64.55 KB (82%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. indenolifant.nl supports HTTPS.
 indenolifant.nl supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.indenolifant.nl
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: E5
Valid from: Feb 27 18:53:43 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 28 18:53:42 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: E5
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: ISRG Root X1
Organization: Internet Security Research Group
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Jun 4 11:04:38 2015 GMT
Valid until: Jun 4 11:04:38 2035 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 indenolifant.nl supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 21:10:02 GMT
server: Apache
x-powered-by: PHP/8.0.30
x-redirect-by: WordPress
location: https://www.indenolifant.nl/
content-length: 0
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
x-varnish: 2174314946
age: 0
via: 1.1 webcache2 (Varnish/7.7)

HTTP/2 200 
date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 21:10:03 GMT
server: Apache
x-powered-by: PHP/8.0.30
link: <https://www.indenolifant.nl/index.php?rest_route=/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: gzip
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
x-varnish: 2248958286
age: 0
via: 1.1 webcache2 (Varnish/7.7)
accept-ranges: bytes

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on December 9, 2008 and will expire on October 10, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar One.com A/S. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on November 22, 2019.
Domain Created:
2008-12-09
Domain Updated:
2019-11-22
Domain Age:
16 years 10 months 1 days
Domain Registrar:
One.com A/S
WhoIs:
 

Domain name: indenolifant.nl
Status:      active

Registrar:
   One.com A/S
   Kalvebod Brygge 24
   1560 Kobenhavn V.
   Denmark

Abuse Contact:
   +45.44451220
   email

DNSSEC:      yes

Domain nameservers:
   ns02.one.com
   ns01.one.com

Creation Date: 2008-12-09

Updated Date: 2019-11-22

Record maintained by: SIDN BV