gvdblog.net Gvdblog.net

   
GVDBlog – Daily HD *** *** Videos

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Gvdblog.net?

• Gvdblog.net ranks #115,955 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Gvdblog.net?

0.0001416% of global Internet users visit Gvdblog.net

How many people visit Gvdblog.net each day?

• Gvdblog.net receives approximately 7K visitors and 49,138 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Gvdblog.net receive most of its visitors from?

• Gvdblog.net is mostly visited by people located in United States,Australia,Germany.

How much Gvdblog.net can earn?

• Gvdblog.net should earn about $191.22/day from advertising revenue.

What is Gvdblog.net estimated value?

• Estimated value of Gvdblog.net is $190,243.65.

What IP addresses does Gvdblog.net resolve to?

• Gvdblog.net resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3033::ac43:ce5f, 172.64.80.1.

Where are Gvdblog.net servers located in?

• Gvdblog.net has servers located in Ottawa, Ontario, K1R, United States.

gvdblog.net Profile

Title:GVDBlog – Daily HD *** *** Videos
Description:Watch Free *** *** Videos Online
Category:Adult / Adult
About: Gvdblog.net is a blog created by GVD, a digital marketing agency based in the Netherlands. The blog covers topics related to digital marketing, such as SEO, content marketing, social media, and more. It also features interviews with industry experts, case studies, and other resources to help businesses succeed in the digital world.
*This text is generated by artificial intelligence and may not be accurate. Edit Site Info

What technologies does gvdblog.net use?

These are the technologies used at gvdblog.net. gvdblog.net has a total of 8 technologies installed in 9 different categories.

gvdblog.net Traffic Analysis

Gvdblog.net is ranked #115,955 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 7K visitors daily, generating a total of 49.1K pageviews. This equates to about 211.6K monthly visitors. Gvdblog.net traffic has decreased by 77.03% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors7K
26.82%
Monthly Visits211.6K
77.03%
Pages per Visit7.04
31.9%
Visit duration06:27
33.28%
Bounce Rate39.45%
6.01%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
6,983
Monthly Visits:
211,585
Pages per Visit:
7.04
Daily Pageviews:
49,138
Avg. visit duration:
06:27
Bounce rate:
39.45%
Global Reach:
0.0001416%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
95,677
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
32,947
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
205,389
HypeRank:
115,955
SEMrush Rank:
1,663,151
SimilarWeb Rank:
160,646
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
82.50%
Referral:
5.91%
Search:
11.54%
Social:
0.04%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
39.92%
Mobile:
60.08%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

447.5K
NOV
0.9M
DEC
211.6K
JAN

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 46.00%
 
Australia 13.16%
 
Germany 12.74%
 
United Kingdom 10.50%
 
Spain 3.96%

Which sites are competitors to gvdblog.net?

Websites similar to gvdblog.net are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 9 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with gvdblog.net in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Baidu Index:
1

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  gvdblog.net
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  1,663,151
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  668
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  490
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $3.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $191.2 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $5.7K and annual gross revenue of approximately $69.8K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $190.2K.

How much would gvdblog.net make?

Daily Revenue:
$191.22
Monthly Revenue:
$5,736.60
Yearly Revenue:
$69,795.30
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 22,602$109.17
 
Australia 6,469$31.18
 
United Kingdom 5,161$13.83
 
Germany 6,258$8.76
 
Spain 1,947$0.93

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$30.82
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$924.53
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$11,248.51
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
8,373
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
251,183
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
3,056,059

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 4,068$19.65
 
Australia 1,294$6.24
 
Germany 1,815$2.54
 
United Kingdom 826$2.21
 
Spain 370$0.18

How much is gvdblog.net worth?

Website Value:
$190.2K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
gvdblog.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
gvdblog.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
gvdblog.net
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is gvdblog.net hosted?

Gvdblog.net may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:3033::ac43:ce5f, 172.64.80.1
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:
Ottawa
Ontario, ON
K1R
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 172.64.80.1

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does gvdblog.net load?

The average loading time of gvdblog.net is 474 ms. The Desktop speed index is 77 and mobile speed index is 66.
Average Load Time:
474 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

77
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)50ms 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 53% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 46% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 46%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 50% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 50% 41% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 41% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 85% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)33ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 83% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)40ms 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 70% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 28%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)959ms 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 70% 23% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 23% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)50ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.9s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 85% 9% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 0.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Largest Contentful Paint 0.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

66
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 91% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.5s 50% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 35% 51% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 51% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 72% 22% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)126ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 86% 10% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 10% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.5s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 74% 18% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 18% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 60% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 60% 31% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 31% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 11% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)143ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 83% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 10% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.4s 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 77% 13% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 3.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Time to Interactive 3.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
First Contentful Paint 1.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Speed Index 2.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact

Does gvdblog.net use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on gvdblog.net are reduced by 82%.
gvdblog.net use br compression.
Original size: 95.55 KB
Compressed size: 16.31 KB
File reduced by: 79.24 KB (82%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. gvdblog.net has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51
Child Safety Reputations:
  10
Child Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. gvdblog.net supports HTTPS.
 gvdblog.net supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: gvdblog.net
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Jan 9 10:38:33 2025 GMT
Valid until: Apr 9 11:34:18 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 gvdblog.net supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 21:57:48 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
link: <https://gvdblog.net/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
x-litespeed-cache: hit
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-turbo-charged-by: LiteSpeed
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=K78IY8qZGSCNSbYCpHHeuU4h7JMrhkXdcNQ82LTN3uWTbs%2FuWA79DR2VTBsY3Fu4HzN47ZlBeLimm6XcWwyjsMFZflNyb180VXWEejIZnnlNpphSdty4IAYLayJL9A%3D%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 91bcdf018cf422eb-ORD
content-encoding: br
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=7739&min_rtt=2251&rtt_var=11259&sent=8&recv=12&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3425&recv_bytes=891&delivery_rate=1071005&cwnd=201&unsent_bytes=0&cid=45baea40e8d9f102&ts=326&x=0"

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3031::6815:16b5 238
AAAA 2606:4700:3033::ac43:ce5f 238
A 172.64.80.1 220
NS kami.ns.cloudflare.com 172737
NS patrick.ns.cloudflare.com 172737
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on December 15, 2022 and will expire on December 15, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on September 9, 2024.
Domain Created:
2022-12-15
Domain Expires:
2025-12-15
Domain Updated:
2024-09-09
Domain Age:
2 years 3 months
Domain Registrar:
Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu
Domain Owner:
Whois Privacy Protection Foundation
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: gvdblog.net
Registry Domain ID: 2745061744_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.registrar.eu
Registrar URL: https://www.registrar.eu
Updated Date: 2024-09-09T21:15:10Z
Creation Date: 2022-12-15T23:42:48Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-12-15T23:42:48Z
Registrar: Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu
Registrar IANA ID: 1647
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +31.104482297
Reseller: 
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Name: Whois Privacy Protection Foundation
Registrant Organization: Whois Privacy Protection Foundation
Registrant Street: Hofplein
Registrant City: Rotterdam
Registrant State/Province: Zuid-Holland
Registrant Postal Code: 3032 AC
Registrant Country: NL
Registrant Phone: +31104482295
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: https://contact-form.registrar.eu/?domainName=gvdblog.net&purpose=owner
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Name: Whois Privacy Protection Foundation
Admin Organization: Whois Privacy Protection Foundation
Admin Street: Hofplein
Admin City: Rotterdam
Admin State/Province: Zuid-Holland
Admin Postal Code: 3032 AC
Admin Country: NL
Admin Phone: +31104482295
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: https://contact-form.registrar.eu/?domainName=gvdblog.net&purpose=admin
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Name: Whois Privacy Protection Foundation
Tech Organization: Whois Privacy Protection Foundation
Tech Street: Hofplein
Tech City: Rotterdam
Tech State/Province: Zuid-Holland
Tech Postal Code: 3032 AC
Tech Country: NL
Tech Phone: +31104482295
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: https://contact-form.registrar.eu/?domainName=gvdblog.net&purpose=tech
Name Server: patrick.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: kami.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: https://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-05T21:58:50Z