gload.to Gload.to

   
GLOAD - Game Download

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Gload.to?

• Gload.to ranks #516,683 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Gload.to?

0.0004158% of global Internet users visit Gload.to

How many people visit Gload.to each day?

• Gload.to receives approximately 20.5K visitors and 60,341 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Gload.to receive most of its visitors from?

• Gload.to is mostly visited by people located in Germany,Austria,United States.

How much Gload.to can earn?

• Gload.to should earn about $131.07/day from advertising revenue.

What is Gload.to estimated value?

• Estimated value of Gload.to is $123,307.34.

What IP addresses does Gload.to resolve to?

• Gload.to resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3030::ac43:d161, 104.21.53.60.

Where are Gload.to servers located in?

• Gload.to has servers located in United States.

gload.to Profile

Title:GLOAD - Game Download Description:Hier findest du Kostenlose Spiele für PC, PS3, PS4, XBOX360, WII und Switch.
Category:Gambling / Casinos

What technologies does gload.to use?

These are the technologies used at gload.to. gload.to has a total of 9 technologies installed in 9 different categories.

gload.to Traffic Analysis

Gload.to is ranked #516,683 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 20.5K visitors daily, generating a total of 60.3K pageviews. This equates to about 621.1K monthly visitors. Gload.to traffic has decreased by 1.99% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors20.5K
3.61%
Monthly Visits621.1K
1.99%
Pages per Visit2.94
11.88%
Visit duration01:45
21.93%
Bounce Rate40.80%
0.61%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
20,498
Monthly Visits:
621,089
Pages per Visit:
2.94
Daily Pageviews:
60,341
Avg. visit duration:
01:45
Bounce rate:
40.80%
Global Reach:
0.0004158%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
1,275,433
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
236,049
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
621,138
HypeRank:
516,683
SEMrush Rank:
2,919,584
SimilarWeb Rank:
90,148
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
82.25%
Referral:
8.71%
Search:
5.62%
Social:
3.41%
Paid:
0.01%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
62.49%
Mobile:
37.51%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

549.5K
DEC
633.7K
JAN
621.1K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Germany 55.82%
 
Austria 11.38%
 
United States 5.54%
 
Korea, Republic of 3.66%
 
France 2.61%

Where do visitors go on gload.to?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
gload.to
100.00%100.00%3.9

Which sites are competitors to gload.to?

Websites similar to gload.to are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Domain
CompareDaily Visitors
s.to
Compare >432.3K
platin***.com
Compare >185.5K
Last update was 100 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with gload.to in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
17,500
Bing Index:
1,840
Baidu Index:
2

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  gload.to
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  2,919,584
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  282
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  162
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $328.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $131.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $3.9K and annual gross revenue of approximately $47.8K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $123.3K.

How much would gload.to make?

Daily Revenue:
$131.07
Monthly Revenue:
$3,932.10
Yearly Revenue:
$47,840.55
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Germany 33,685$47.16
 
United States 3,340$16.13
 
Austria 6,868$13.87
 
Korea, Republic of 2,206$1.32
 
France 1,577$0.91

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$20.34
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$610.22
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$7,424.39
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
12,417
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
372,522
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
4,532,350

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Germany 9,769$13.68
 
Austria 1,786$3.61
 
United States 601$2.90
 
France 174$0.10
 
Korea, Republic of 88$0.05

How much is gload.to worth?

Website Value:
$123.3K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
gload.to
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
gload.to
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
gload.to
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2021-04-02 19:27:45
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is gload.to hosted?

Gload.to may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:3030::ac43:d161, 104.21.53.60
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 104.21.53.60

How fast does gload.to load?

The average loading time of gload.to is 934 ms. The Desktop speed index is 95 and mobile speed index is 81.
Average Load Time:
934 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

95
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 48% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 48% 45% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 45% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 84% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)24ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 67% 28% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)29ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Speed Index 1.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Time to Interactive 1.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

81
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 48% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 54% 38% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 38% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 79% 15% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)127ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 88% 9% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 9% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)936ms 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 71% 25% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 25% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 85% 10% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)115ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 91% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
First Contentful Paint 2.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 20 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 5.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 4.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 3.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs

Does gload.to use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on gload.to are reduced by 82%.
gload.to use br compression.
Original size: 404 KB
Compressed size: 71.39 KB
File reduced by: 332.6 KB (82%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. gload.to has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51
Child Safety Reputations:
  10
Child Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. gload.to supports HTTPS.
 gload.to supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: gload.to
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Jan 12 21:05:25 2025 GMT
Valid until: Apr 12 22:02:41 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 gload.to supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 16:26:02 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
server: cloudflare
vary: Accept-Encoding
last-modified: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 16:24:43 GMT
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
content-encoding: br
cf-ray: 91dbee7fb81422f3-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3034::6815:353c 230
AAAA 2606:4700:3030::ac43:d161 230
A 172.67.209.97 230
A 104.21.53.60 230
NS apollo.ns.cloudflare.com 86330
NS linda.ns.cloudflare.com 86330
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on January 1, 1970 and will expire on January 1, 1970 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar . The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on January 1, 1970.
Domain Created:
1970-01-01
Domain Expires:
1970-01-01
Domain Updated:
1970-01-01
Domain Age:
55 years 5 months 16 days
WhoIs:
 

Tonic whoisd V1.1
gload apollo.ns.cloudflare.com
gload linda.ns.cloudflare.com