gitb.org Gitb.org

   
Gitb – Viral Video Leaked

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Gitb.org?

• 0.0004518% of global Internet users visit Gitb.org

How many people visit Gitb.org each day?

• Gitb.org receives approximately 22.3K visitors and 60,654 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Gitb.org receive most of its visitors from?

• Gitb.org is mostly visited by people located in United States,India,United Kingdom.

How much Gitb.org can earn?

• Gitb.org should earn about $179.74/day from advertising revenue.

What is Gitb.org estimated value?

• Estimated value of Gitb.org is $169,772.92.

What IP addresses does Gitb.org resolve to?

• Gitb.org resolves to the IP addresses 45.143.99.2.

Where are Gitb.org servers located in?

• Gitb.org has servers located in Istanbul, Istanbul, 34000, Türkiye.

gitb.org Profile

Title:Gitb – Viral Video Leaked
Category:Arts and Entertainment / Streaming & Online TV
Edit Site Info

What technologies does gitb.org use?

These are the technologies used at gitb.org. gitb.org has a total of 8 technologies installed in 8 different categories.
CMS
ButterCMS ButterCMS
WordPress WordPress
WordPress themes
GeneratePress GeneratePress
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Analytics
Histats Histats
Web Servers
LiteSpeed LiteSpeed
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Databases
MySQL MySQL

gitb.org Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 22.3K visitors daily, generating a total of 60.7K pageviews. This equates to about 674.8K monthly visitors. Gitb.org traffic has decreased by 38.31% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors22.3K
39.37%
Monthly Visits674.8K
38.31%
Pages per Visit2.72
13.77%
Visit duration00:48
11.61%
Bounce Rate51.18%
18.21%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
22,272
Monthly Visits:
674,842
Pages per Visit:
2.72
Daily Pageviews:
60,654
Avg. visit duration:
00:48
Bounce rate:
51.18%
Global Reach:
0.0004518%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
868,076
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
776,671
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
674,913
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
11,722,232
SimilarWeb Rank:
73,854
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
91.92%
Referral:
5.81%
Search:
0.21%
Social:
2.06%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
5.33%
Mobile:
94.67%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

631K
DEC
1.1M
JAN
674.8K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 39.65%
 
India 20.39%
 
United Kingdom 8.03%
 
Indonesia 7.02%
 
Philippines 6.92%

Which sites are competitors to gitb.org?

Websites similar to gitb.org are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 93 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with gitb.org in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
7

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  gitb.org
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  11,722,232
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  13
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  1
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $179.7 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $5.4K and annual gross revenue of approximately $65.6K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $169.8K.

How much would gitb.org make?

Daily Revenue:
$179.74
Monthly Revenue:
$5,392.20
Yearly Revenue:
$65,605.10
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 24,049$116.16
 
United Kingdom 4,871$13.06
 
India 12,368$4.70
 
Philippines 4,197$0.84
 
Indonesia 4,257$0.47

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$24.64
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$739.30
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$8,994.87
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
11,334
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
340,023
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
4,136,946

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 4,329$20.91
 
United Kingdom 779$2.09
 
India 3,463$1.32
 
Indonesia 2,469$0.27
 
Philippines 294$0.06

How much is gitb.org worth?

Website Value:
$169.8K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
gitb.org
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
gitb.org
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
gitb.org
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is gitb.org hosted? ▼

Gitb.org may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
45.143.99.2
ASN:
AS207279 
ISP:
Markahost Telekomunikasyon Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi 
Server Location:
Istanbul
Istanbul, 34
34000
Türkiye, TR
 

Other sites hosted on 45.143.99.2

How fast does gitb.org load? ▼

The average loading time of gitb.org is 1081 ms. The Desktop speed index is 98 and mobile speed index is 98.
Average Load Time:
1081 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)14ms 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 67% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 20% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 12%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 59% 33% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 33% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 78% 17% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 81% 14% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)14ms 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 67% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 20% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 12%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 59% 33% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 33% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 78% 17% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.3s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 81% 14% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 14% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Speed Index 1.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 0.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 94% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)830ms 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 72% 22% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 22% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 91% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)466ms 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 31% 45% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 45% 23% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 23%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.1s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)33ms 48% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 48% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 45% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 45%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.6s 48% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 48% 33% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 33% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 17%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.2s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 63% 28% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 28% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)246ms 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 70% 17% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 17% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 12%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.2s 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 59% 26% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 26% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13%

Lab Data

LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Speed Index 4.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Contentful Paint 1.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading

Does gitb.org use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on gitb.org are reduced by 75%.
gitb.org use br compression.
Original size: 200.07 KB
Compressed size: 48.18 KB
File reduced by: 151.9 KB (75%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. gitb.org has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. gitb.org supports HTTPS.
 gitb.org supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: gitb.org
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Feb 8 11:45:32 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 9 11:45:31 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 gitb.org supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
x-powered-by: PHP/8.0.30
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
x-ua-compatible: IE=edge
link: <https://gitb.org/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
content-encoding: br
vary: Accept-Encoding
date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 22:23:19 GMT
server: LiteSpeed
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q050=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q046=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q043=":443"; ma=2592000, quic=":443"; ma=2592000; v="43,46"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 86400
Mname ns1.markahost.com
Rname cpanellog.markahost.com.tr
Serial Number 2024022402
Refresh 3600
Retry 1800
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
MX gitb.org 14400
TXT v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:45.143.99.2 include:relay.mailbaby.net ~all 14400
A 45.143.99.2 14318
NS ns1.markahost.com 3518
NS ns2.markahost.com 3518

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on February 24, 2024 and will expire on February 24, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Turkticaret.net Yazılım Hizmetleri Sanayi ve Ticar. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on January 31, 2025.
Domain Created:
2024-02-24
Domain Expires:
2026-02-24
Domain Updated:
2025-01-31
Domain Age:
1 years 3 months 19 days
Domain Registrar:
Turkticaret.net Yazılım Hizmetleri Sanayi ve Ticar
Domain Owner:
GDPR Masked
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: gitb.org
Registry Domain ID: 17ee1d69f85d42d6916c4f892b329c8f-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: http://whois.reg2c.com
Registrar URL: http://www.reg2c.com
Updated Date: 2025-01-31T14:51:25Z
Creation Date: 2024-02-24T12:52:09Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-02-24T12:52:09Z
Registrar: Turkticaret.net Yazılım Hizmetleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.
Registrar IANA ID: 819
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +90.2242248640
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Organization: GDPR Masked
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant State/Province: GDPR Masked
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Name Server: ns1.markahost.com
Name Server: ns2.markahost.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-12T22:26:21Z