genteflow.lat Genteflow.lat

   
GENTEFLOW.Vip ~ Descargar Música de YouTube 2025.

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Genteflow.lat?

7.3E-6% of global Internet users visit Genteflow.lat

How many people visit Genteflow.lat each day?

• Genteflow.lat receives approximately 361 visitors and 1,097 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Genteflow.lat receive most of its visitors from?

• Genteflow.lat is mostly visited by people located in Mexico,Paraguay,Peru.

How much Genteflow.lat can earn?

• Genteflow.lat should earn about $0.39/day from advertising revenue.

What is Genteflow.lat estimated value?

• Estimated value of Genteflow.lat is $366.79.

What IP addresses does Genteflow.lat resolve to?

• Genteflow.lat resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3030::ac43:c6a9, 172.67.198.169.

Where are Genteflow.lat servers located in?

• Genteflow.lat has servers located in United States.

genteflow.lat Profile

Title:GENTEFLOW.Vip ~ Descargar Música de YouTube 2025. Description:genteflow.vip la mejor web para descargar musica gratis, » descargar mp3 « , escuchar musica 2025 online desde tu celular totalmente gratis.
Tags:

What technologies does genteflow.lat use?

These are the technologies used at genteflow.lat. genteflow.lat has a total of 9 technologies installed in 9 different categories.

genteflow.lat Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 361 visitors daily, generating a total of 1.1K pageviews. This equates to about 10.9K monthly visitors. Genteflow.lat traffic has decreased by 96.41% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors361
91.51%
Monthly Visits10.9K
96.41%
Pages per Visit3.04
374.39%
Visit duration02:01
769.91%
Bounce Rate24.38%
100%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
361
Monthly Visits:
10,938
Pages per Visit:
3.04
Daily Pageviews:
1,097
Avg. visit duration:
02:01
Bounce rate:
24.38%
Global Reach:
7.3E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
2,377
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
2,364
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
11,053
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
2,508,547
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,678,457
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
0%
Referral:
0%
Search:
100.00%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
34.46%
Mobile:
65.54%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

14.6K
DEC
304.7K
JAN
10.9K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Mexico 74.42%
 
Paraguay 18.28%
 
Peru 7.31%
Last update was 129 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with genteflow.lat in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  genteflow.lat
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  2,508,547
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  10
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  221
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $0.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $11.7 and annual gross revenue of approximately $142.4. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $366.8.

How much would genteflow.lat make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.39
Monthly Revenue:
$11.70
Yearly Revenue:
$142.35
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Mexico 816$0.23
 
Paraguay 201$0.11
 
Peru 80$0.05

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.03
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$0.84
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$10.23
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
85
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
2,565
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
31,206

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Mexico 73$0.02
 
Peru 8$0.01
 
Paraguay 4$0.00

How much is genteflow.lat worth?

Website Value:
$366.8

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
genteflow.lat
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
genteflow.lat
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
genteflow.lat
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is genteflow.lat hosted?

Genteflow.lat may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:3030::ac43:c6a9, 172.67.198.169
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 172.67.198.169

How fast does genteflow.lat load?

The average loading time of genteflow.lat is 217 ms. The Desktop speed index is 89 and mobile speed index is 65.
Average Load Time:
217 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

89
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.7s 61% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 61% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 24% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 24%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 72% 13% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 13%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)82ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 91% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 79% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.4s 14% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 25% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 25% 60% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 60%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.0s 23% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 23% 50% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 50% 25% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 25%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)108ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.2s 48% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 48% 38% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 38% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 12%

Lab Data

CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 1.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Contentful Paint 1.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

65
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)778ms 61% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 75% 14% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)156ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 86% 10% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 10% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)7ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 88% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 10% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.1s 38% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 38% 22% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 22% 38% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 38%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.8s 44% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 44% 36% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 36% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)239ms 68% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 68% 24% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 24% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.3s 57% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 57% 25% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 25% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 16%

Lab Data

Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Speed Index 4.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 5.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 4.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 5.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading

Does genteflow.lat use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on genteflow.lat are reduced by 71%.
genteflow.lat use br compression.
Original size: 32.58 KB
Compressed size: 9.16 KB
File reduced by: 23.42 KB (71%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. genteflow.lat supports HTTPS.
 genteflow.lat supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: genteflow.vip
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Mar 20 00:48:34 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 18 01:46:23 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 genteflow.lat supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:40:42 GMT
content-type: text/html
location: https://m3.genteflow.vip/
x-turbo-charged-by: LiteSpeed
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=C9MWc%2F4Xr7ZIVDaFhynB2tkdyOjhS9ShnB0U%2BWGv7qAFTjIuM%2BbgwPO08y%2FrB7dBWNSW%2FGX0MWlyNaAO8Eb5fy7H4ZTzDTakf8p2AEggVr6MwpQz2PLd25gnf4CvlIjN"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 92783a3b4d49616a-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=1589&min_rtt=1453&rtt_var=496&sent=7&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3416&recv_bytes=893&delivery_rate=1517819&cwnd=198&unsent_bytes=0&cid=9add6dc29fa9adf7&ts=33&x=0"

HTTP/2 301 
date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:40:42 GMT
content-type: text/html
location: https://m.genteflow.vip/
x-turbo-charged-by: LiteSpeed
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=S2E%2FIUlI9WnWz8HiDBR9yFWGs0i9n9UUIaY0HwX2eFXHkB4kJkFTYpE19Vol%2FXSDQvLqDfN%2Baw0xpVux30RWis%2FAO7ZvL%2BwOtePMVP%2F8ziO40rVmFHb3HrQUcp%2Bh4Vrp73en"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 92783a3b8f5198b9-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=2584&min_rtt=2326&rtt_var=626&sent=5&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3395&recv_bytes=895&delivery_rate=1106610&cwnd=253&unsent_bytes=0&cid=74467b3d77954053&ts=28&x=0"

HTTP/2 301 
date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:40:42 GMT
content-type: text/html
location: https://ww1.genteflow.vip/
x-turbo-charged-by: LiteSpeed
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=u71M49CmoTGF9THu8NdHZjcHdo3%2BHD3eEl3JQFHgtYiUE4rA1aTefVBbBueRUjFJxcbZbSv3YTAFpwdohr2BRHir7qyrJXcW%2BAFZ%2BQ65ePE%2F3WMo%2B83bsyBKZXklNh4N8L4%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 92783a3bbc4810d8-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=1516&min_rtt=1482&rtt_var=466&sent=7&recv=10&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3416&recv_bytes=894&delivery_rate=1954116&cwnd=253&unsent_bytes=0&cid=3da89f0370a5da89&ts=41&x=0"

HTTP/2 301 
date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:40:42 GMT
content-type: text/html
location: https://www3.genteflow.vip/
x-turbo-charged-by: LiteSpeed
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=25m6T9KvL8j0hMgJl8vkp8yNVyUjN29WeTs775AEvfd7CCgtv02gk0OcWzC0RsahrLthfMqfdA25H4Nmj2pZ1%2BJdqF%2BSqa9zO9YY8bpqUEx9xtE1syFIp2rVgeaFvDzcC2yMHA%3D%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 92783a3c0b6a117f-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=1714&min_rtt=1639&rtt_var=574&sent=6&recv=10&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3394&recv_bytes=896&delivery_rate=1766931&cwnd=219&unsent_bytes=0&cid=9c7b7eb5733b8302&ts=36&x=0"

HTTP/2 200 
date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:40:42 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-turbo-charged-by: LiteSpeed
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=jsl0zb%2FZFGpu4LO2ZhK%2Brgw56oxwJ3Ibea1gysqeDItDqwEpzRJyYrWasL9CfJbSdRloPP%2FMqmeY5yBkyOjHpsfqYFkLxSsjRz1aU0Sk2OLEQhQvQo%2BrmAQoLIuYF91syeFuY7E%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 92783a3c49791155-ORD
content-encoding: br
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=1617&min_rtt=1451&rtt_var=466&sent=7&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3417&recv_bytes=897&delivery_rate=1575625&cwnd=218&unsent_bytes=0&cid=07477282ac3647d6&ts=47&x=0"

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3036::6815:44d3 235
AAAA 2606:4700:3030::ac43:c6a9 235
A 104.21.68.211 235
A 172.67.198.169 235
NS pablo.ns.cloudflare.com 3535
NS vera.ns.cloudflare.com 3535
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on May 25, 2024 and will expire on May 25, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Name.com, Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on June 1, 2024.
Domain Created:
2024-05-25
Domain Expires:
2025-05-25
Domain Updated:
2024-06-01
Domain Age:
1 years 2 months 11 days
Domain Registrar:
Name.com, Inc.
Domain Owner:
Domain Protection Services, Inc.
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: GENTEFLOW.LAT 
Registry Domain ID: D458185668-CNIC 
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.name.com 
Registrar URL: http://www.name.com 
Updated Date: 2024-06-01T12:59:35Z 
Creation Date: 2024-05-25T18:59:32Z 
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-05-25T23:59:59Z 
Registrar: Name.com, Inc. 
Registrar IANA ID: 625 
Reseller:  
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited 
Registry Registrant ID: Not Available From Registry 
Registrant Name: Redacted For Privacy 
Registrant Organization: Domain Protection Services, Inc. 
Registrant Street: PO Box 1769  
Registrant City: Denver 
Registrant State/Province: CO 
Registrant Postal Code: 80201 
Registrant Country: US 
Registrant Phone: +1.7208009072 
Registrant Fax: +1.7209758725 
Registrant Email: https://www.name.com/contact-domain-whois/genteflow.lat 
Registry Admin ID: Not Available From Registry 
Admin Name: Redacted For Privacy 
Admin Organization: Domain Protection Services, Inc. 
Admin Street: PO Box 1769  
Admin City: Denver 
Admin State/Province: CO 
Admin Postal Code: 80201 
Admin Country: US 
Admin Phone: +1.7208009072 
Admin Fax: +1.7209758725 
Admin Email: https://www.name.com/contact-domain-whois/genteflow.lat 
Registry Tech ID: Not Available From Registry 
Tech Name: Redacted For Privacy 
Tech Organization: Domain Protection Services, Inc. 
Tech Street: PO Box 1769  
Tech City: Denver 
Tech State/Province: CO 
Tech Postal Code: 80201 
Tech Country: US 
Tech Phone: +1.7208009072 
Tech Fax: +1.7209758725 
Tech Email: https://www.name.com/contact-domain-whois/genteflow.lat 
Name Server: vera.ns.cloudflare.com 
Name Server: pablo.ns.cloudflare.com 
DNSSEC: unSigned 
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email 
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.7203101849 
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-28T15:41:45Z