Garder.me
Safeguard Your Data for Eternity - Unparalleled Data Security
Domain Summary
What is the traffic rank for Garder.me?
• Garder.me ranks #6,735,098 globally on HypeStat.
What percent of global Internet users visit Garder.me?
• 2.2E-6% of global Internet users visit Garder.me
How many people visit Garder.me each day?
• Garder.me receives approximately 108 visitors and 113 page impressions per day.
Which countries does Garder.me receive most of its visitors from?
• Garder.me is mostly visited by people located in Singapore,United States,Taiwan.
How much Garder.me can earn?
• Garder.me should earn about $0.42/day from advertising revenue.
What is Garder.me estimated value?
• Estimated value of Garder.me is $462.92.
What IP addresses does Garder.me resolve to?
• Garder.me resolves to the IP addresses 52.169.147.155.
Where are Garder.me servers located in?
• Garder.me has servers located in Dublin, Leinster, D02, Ireland.
garder.me Profile
Title:Safeguard Your Data for Eternity - Unparalleled Data Security
Description:Software technology service to safeguard and protect your files, data and privacy using the latest encryption and data security technology
Tags:
About:
At Garder.me, we redefine data security by providing an enhanced level of protection that acts as an additional layer of defence. Our cutting-edge data security and protection service are designed to significantly reduce the risk of data breaches and cyberattacks, ensuring the utmost safety of your sensitive information.
When you entrust us with your valuable data, you gain more than just encryption; you gain a comprehensive shield that goes above and beyond industry standards. Our advanced cybersecurity and encryption algorithms not only encrypt your files but create an additional layer of security, making unauthorized access nearly impossible.
Rest assured that your sensitive information remains locked away from prying eyes, safeguarding your privacy and preventing data loss. Garder.me empowers you to reinforce your cybersecurity defences in various ways, from file encryption to robust data security measures and the creation of secure data backups and long-term archives.
In a digital landscape where threats constantly evolve, Garder.me remains at the forefront. Our unwavering commitment to innovation and improvement ensures that your data remains impervious to the ever-changing threat landscape.
Choose Garder.me for state-of-the-art technology that not only reduces the risk of data breaches but also provides an extra layer of security to protect your sensitive information. With Garder.me, your data isn't just secure; it's fortified! Edit Site Info
When you entrust us with your valuable data, you gain more than just encryption; you gain a comprehensive shield that goes above and beyond industry standards. Our advanced cybersecurity and encryption algorithms not only encrypt your files but create an additional layer of security, making unauthorized access nearly impossible.
Rest assured that your sensitive information remains locked away from prying eyes, safeguarding your privacy and preventing data loss. Garder.me empowers you to reinforce your cybersecurity defences in various ways, from file encryption to robust data security measures and the creation of secure data backups and long-term archives.
In a digital landscape where threats constantly evolve, Garder.me remains at the forefront. Our unwavering commitment to innovation and improvement ensures that your data remains impervious to the ever-changing threat landscape.
Choose Garder.me for state-of-the-art technology that not only reduces the risk of data breaches but also provides an extra layer of security to protect your sensitive information. With Garder.me, your data isn't just secure; it's fortified! Edit Site Info
What technologies does garder.me use?
These are the technologies used at garder.me. garder.me has a total of 9 technologies installed in 6 different categories.
garder.me Traffic Analysis
Garder.me is ranked #6,735,098 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 108 visitors daily, generating a total of 113 pageviews. This equates to about 2.4K monthly visitors. Garder.me traffic has increased by 4.42% compared to last month.Daily Visitors108
9.09%
Monthly Visits2.4K
4.42%
Pages per Visit1.43
14.4%
Visit duration00:19
58.33%
Bounce Rate70.95%
11.07%
- Daily Unique Visitors:
- 108
- Monthly Visits:
- 2,363
- Pages per Visit:
- 1.43
- Daily Pageviews:
- 113
- Avg. visit duration:
- 00:19
- Bounce rate:
- 70.95%
- Global Reach:
- 2.2E-6%
- Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
- 3
- Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
- 2,815
- HypeRank:
- 6,735,098
- SEMrush Rank:
- 12,565,131
- SimilarWeb Rank:
- 35,204,789
Traffic sources
- Direct:
- 95.60%
- Referral:
- 0.04%
- Search:
- 0.04%
- Social:
- 0.08%
- Paid:
- 0%
Desktop vs Mobile
- Desktop:
- 55.31%
- Mobile:
- 35.42%
Total Visits Last 3 Months
788
FEB
2K
MAR
2.5K
APR
Visitors by country
- Country
- Users%
- Singapore 71.94%
- United States 2.67%
- Taiwan 1.27%
- Viet Nam 1.27%
- Brazil 1.02%
Backlinks Report ▼
Garder.me has a total of 214 backlinks from 58 referring domains and most of them comes from United States.- Total Backlinks:
- 214
- Follow Links:
- n/a
- Nofollow Links:
- n/a
- Referring Domains:
- 58
- Referring IPs:
- 61
- Authority Domain Score:
- 6
Backlinks by country
- Country
- Domains
- United States 6
- Singapore 1
- Russian Federation 1
- Romania 1
- Hong Kong 1
Backlinks by TLDs
- TLD Distribution
- Domains
- .com
- 12
- .info
- 8
- .net
- 5
- .edu
- 0
- .gov
- 0
Last update was 3 days ago
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with garder.me in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.
Search Engine Indexes ▼
Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.- Google Index:
- 1
- Bing Index:
- 10
▼
SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.- Domain:
- garder.me
- Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic) - 12,565,131
- Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP) - 2
- Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results) - 1
- Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords) - $0.00
Revenue report ▼
Google.com would generate approximately $0.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $12.6 and annual gross revenue of approximately $153.3. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $462.9.How much would garder.me make?
- Daily Revenue:
- $0.42
- Monthly Revenue:
- $12.60
- Yearly Revenue:
- $153.30
Daily earning by country
- CountryPageviewsEarning
- Singapore 81$0.15
- United States 3$0.01
- Brazil 1$0.00
- Viet Nam 1$0.00
- Taiwan 1$0.00
Loss of money due to Adblock?
- Daily Revenue Loss:
- $0.05
- Monthly Revenue Loss:
- $1.41
- Yearly Revenue Loss:
- $17.20
- Daily Pageviews Blocked:
- 24
- Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
- 734
- Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
- 8,933
Daily revenue loss by country
- CountryBlockedLost Money
- Singapore 24$0.04
- United States 1$0.00
- Brazil 0$0.00
- Taiwan 0$0.00
- Viet Nam 0$0.00
How much is garder.me worth?
- Website Value:
- $462.9
Ad Experience Report ▼
Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.Mobile summary
- Root domain:
- garder.me
- Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.) - Not reviewed
Desktop summary
- Root domain:
- garder.me
- Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.) - Not reviewed
Abusive Experience Report ▼
Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.- Root domain:
- garder.me
- Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.) - Not reviewed
Where is garder.me hosted? ▼
Garder.me may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.- Server IP:
- 52.169.147.155
- ASN:
- AS8075
- ISP:
- Microsoft Corporation
- Server Location:
- Dublin
Leinster, L
D02
Ireland, IE
Other sites hosted on 52.169.147.155
There are no other sites hosted on this IPHow fast does garder.me load? ▼
The average loading time of garder.me is 475 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 84.- Average Load Time:
- 475 ms
Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop
Field Data
Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Origin Data
All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Lab Data
Time to Interactive 0.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Forced reflow
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Lazy load third-party resources with facades
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Long critical network tree
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 0.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Render blocking requests
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Font display
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Improve image delivery
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Total Blocking Time 80 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 130 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 0.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
LCP request discovery
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
CSS Selector costs
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile
Field Data
Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Origin Data
All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Lab Data
LCP request discovery
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint 3.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 3.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Render blocking requests
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Forced reflow
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Lazy load third-party resources with facades
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
INP by phase
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Speed Index 2.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
CSS Selector costs
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Max Potential First Input Delay 140 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Long critical network tree
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Meaningful Paint
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Improve image delivery
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
First Contentful Paint 2.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 90 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Does garder.me use compression? ▼
Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on garder.me are reduced by 63%.
garder.me use br compression.
Original size: 60.72 KB
Compressed size: 22.26 KB
File reduced by: 38.46 KB (63%)
Compressed size: 22.26 KB
File reduced by: 38.46 KB (63%)
Google Safe Browsing ▼
Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼
An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. garder.me supports HTTPS. garder.me supports HTTPS
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.garder.me
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Apr 24 12:49:18 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 23 12:49:17 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Apr 24 12:49:18 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 23 12:49:17 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼
HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency. garder.me supports HTTP/2
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...
Http Header ▼
HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.cache-control: no-cache, no-store, max-age=0
pragma: no-cache
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
content-encoding: br
last-modified: Mon, 07 Apr 2025, 14:10:00 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0
strict-transport-security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
access-control-allow-origin: https://www.garder.me https://*.google-analytics.com https://www.googletagmanager.com
content-security-policy: default-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; form-action 'self'; manifest-src 'self'; upgrade-insecure-requests; font-src 'self' data:; style-src 'self' https://tagmanager.google.com; img-src 'self' data: https://www.garder.me https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.google-analytics.com; connect-src 'self' https://www.garder.me wss://www.garder.me/ https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://analytics.google.com; object-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'nonce-ASf4Cr4fhC6Xu6gasWcG6KoX7oZ3sxKg' 'strict-dynamic' https://www.garder.me https://www.googletagmanager.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com;
content-security-policy: frame-ancestors 'self'
cross-origin-embedder-policy: require-corp
cross-origin-opener-policy: same-origin
cross-origin-resource-policy: same-origin
permissions-policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(self), display-capture=(), encrypted-media=(self), fullscreen=(self), geolocation=(self), gyroscope=(), magnetometer=(), microphone=(), midi=(), payment=(self), picture-in-picture=(), publickey-credentials-get=(self), screen-wake-lock=(self), sync-xhr=(self), usb=(self)
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
x-clacks-overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
x-content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-permitted-cross-domain-policies: none
x-robots-tag: all
x-xss-protection: 0
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400; persist=1
blazor-enhanced-nav: allow
set-cookie: .AspNetCore.Culture=c%3Den%7Cuic%3Den; path=/; secure; samesite=strict; httponly
set-cookie: .AspNetCore.Antiforgery.tDiHCI_I3QE=CfDJ8K187pY4Wa1GtpQW0mHn98Dkfg72KkjAYRwm6zrJ3_Ngf-WV8Ox-rcw8Pq-nSmniO5TsfZCGWsCu9JJr06CLLM90fKGqo6HZWBgQU3Xs9lYFzVolPfLleXL66-7eVFWyRqw3UyVx1rZb9sPZIPQkS_g; path=/; secure; samesite=strict; httponly
x-powered-by: ASP.NET
date: Sat, 10 May 2025 10:52:58 GMT
DNS Lookup ▼
DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.| Type | Ip | Target/Txt | TTL |
| A | 52.169.147.155 | 3571 | |
| NS | 3571 | ||
| NS | 3571 | ||
| NS | 3571 | ||
| NS | 3571 | ||
| HINFO | 300 |
Whois Lookup ▼
Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on September 30, 2020 and will expire on September 30, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Mesh Digital Limited. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on November 14, 2024.- Domain Created:
- 2020-09-30
- Domain Expires:
- 2025-09-30
- Domain Updated:
- 2024-11-14
- Domain Age:
- 4 years 7 months 13 days
- Domain Registrar:
- Mesh Digital Limited
- Domain Owner:
- Domains By Proxy, LLC
- WhoIs:
Domain Name: garder.me Registry Domain ID: 62aad318f7ed4a34b20903ecb4b3efa9-DONUTS Registrar WHOIS Server: domains.meshdigital.com Registrar URL: http://www.domainbox.com Updated Date: 2024-11-14T16:06:46Z Creation Date: 2020-09-30T16:06:31Z Registry Expiry Date: 2025-09-30T16:06:31Z Registrar: Mesh Digital Limited Registrar IANA ID: 1390 Registrar Abuse Contact Email:Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8779770099 Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED Registrant Name: REDACTED Registrant Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC Registrant Street: REDACTED Registrant City: REDACTED Registrant State/Province: Arizona Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED Registrant Country: US Registrant Phone: REDACTED Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED Registrant Fax: REDACTED Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED Registrant Email: REDACTED Registry Admin ID: REDACTED Admin Name: REDACTED Admin Organization: REDACTED Admin Street: REDACTED Admin City: REDACTED Admin State/Province: REDACTED Admin Postal Code: REDACTED Admin Country: REDACTED Admin Phone: REDACTED Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED Admin Fax: REDACTED Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED Admin Email: REDACTED Registry Tech ID: REDACTED Tech Name: REDACTED Tech Organization: REDACTED Tech Street: REDACTED Tech City: REDACTED Tech State/Province: REDACTED Tech Postal Code: REDACTED Tech Country: REDACTED Tech Phone: REDACTED Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED Tech Fax: REDACTED Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED Tech Email: REDACTED Name Server: ns1-32.azure-dns.com Name Server: ns2-32.azure-dns.net Name Server: ns3-32.azure-dns.org Name Server: ns4-32.azure-dns.info DNSSEC: unsigned URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://icann.org/wicf/ >>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-04-16T11:25:18Z