fixpart.ro Fixpart.ro

   
Platforma pentru repararea tuturor aparatelor tale – FixPart

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Fixpart.ro?

• 5.27E-5% of global Internet users visit Fixpart.ro

How many people visit Fixpart.ro each day?

• Fixpart.ro receives approximately 2.6K visitors and 8,253 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Fixpart.ro receive most of its visitors from?

• Fixpart.ro is mostly visited by people located in Romania,Germany,United Kingdom.

How much Fixpart.ro can earn?

• Fixpart.ro should earn about $2.87/day from advertising revenue.

What is Fixpart.ro estimated value?

• Estimated value of Fixpart.ro is $2,844.99.

What IP addresses does Fixpart.ro resolve to?

• Fixpart.ro resolves to the IP addresses 151.101.131.52.

Where are Fixpart.ro servers located in?

• Fixpart.ro has servers located in United States.

fixpart.ro Profile

Title:Platforma pentru repararea tuturor aparatelor tale – FixPart Description:Specialistul în piese de schimb, produse de întreținere și accesorii pentru toate aparatele tale. Comandă acum pentru: mașina de spălat vase, aspirator, frigider, congelator, mașina de spălat rufe, cuptor cu microunde, cuptor. Mărci: Philips, Bosch, DeLonghi, Siemens, LG, Krups, Indesit
Category:eCommerce and Shopping / Price Comparison
Edit Site Info

What technologies does fixpart.ro use?

These are the technologies used at fixpart.ro. fixpart.ro has a total of 8 technologies installed in 6 different categories.
Ecommerce
Cart Functionality Cart Functionality
Security
HSTS HSTS
reCAPTCHA reCAPTCHA
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Open Graph Open Graph
PWA PWA
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
Caching
Varnish Varnish

fixpart.ro Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 2.6K visitors daily, generating a total of 8.3K pageviews. This equates to about 78.7K monthly visitors. Fixpart.ro traffic has increased by 8.9% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors2.6K
4.18%
Monthly Visits78.7K
8.9%
Pages per Visit3.18
26.58%
Visit duration03:50
15.99%
Bounce Rate44.06%
20.26%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
2,597
Monthly Visits:
78,689
Pages per Visit:
3.18
Daily Pageviews:
8,253
Avg. visit duration:
03:50
Bounce rate:
44.06%
Global Reach:
5.27E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
119,282
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
95,479
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
79,504
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
13,537,281
SimilarWeb Rank:
392,375
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
66.32%
Referral:
0.95%
Search:
24.41%
Social:
0%
Paid:
8.32%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
23.39%
Mobile:
76.61%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

102.7K
DEC
72.3K
JAN
78.7K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Romania 94.49%
 
Germany 4.08%
 
United Kingdom 0.88%
 
Netherlands 0.37%
 
Austria 0.10%

Which sites are competitors to fixpart.ro?

Websites similar to fixpart.ro are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 87 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with fixpart.ro in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  fixpart.ro
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  13,537,281
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  38
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $2.9 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $86.1 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $2.8K.

How much would fixpart.ro make?

Daily Revenue:
$2.87
Monthly Revenue:
$86.10
Yearly Revenue:
$1,047.55
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Romania 7,798$2.11
 
Germany 337$0.47
 
United Kingdom 72$0.19
 
Netherlands 31$0.06
 
Austria 8$0.02

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.62
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$18.73
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$227.84
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
1,754
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
52,625
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
640,272

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Romania 1,638$0.44
 
Germany 98$0.14
 
United Kingdom 12$0.03
 
Netherlands 5$0.01
 
Austria 2$0.00

How much is fixpart.ro worth?

Website Value:
$2.8K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
fixpart.ro
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
fixpart.ro
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
fixpart.ro
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is fixpart.ro hosted? ▼

Fixpart.ro may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.

How fast does fixpart.ro load? ▼

The average loading time of fixpart.ro is 1107 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
1107 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)467ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)844ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)79ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.0s 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 93% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)653ms 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 82% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)917ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)63ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.0s 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Speed Index 0.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)4ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 84% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 15% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)557ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 89% 8% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)186ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 78% 19% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 19% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)711ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 80% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)149ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 86% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 11% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Speed Index 1.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Does fixpart.ro use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on fixpart.ro are reduced by %.
fixpart.ro does not use compression.
Original size: 192.18 KB
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. fixpart.ro supports HTTPS.
 fixpart.ro supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: fixpart.ro
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Feb 11 05:17:52 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 12 05:17:51 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 fixpart.ro supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: nginx
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
cache-control: no-cache, private
set-cookie: fp-sess=vbOvTQ5SusUi7Ts6xgPev0lzIWsKpwDn8brlsRyV; expires=Sat, 29 Mar 2025 09:10:23 GMT; Max-Age=345600; path=/; secure; httponly; samesite=lax
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
accept-ranges: bytes
date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 09:10:23 GMT
via: 1.1 varnish
x-served-by: cache-chi-kigq8000125-CHI
x-cache: MISS
x-cache-hits: 0
x-timer: S1742893823.785213,VS0,VE734
vary: Accept-Encoding
strict-transport-security: max-age=31557600
alt-svc: h3=":443";ma=86400,h3-29=":443";ma=86400,h3-27=":443";ma=86400

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on February 22, 2021 and will expire on February 21, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Ascio Technologies Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on June 20, 2025.
Domain Created:
2021-02-22
Domain Expires:
2026-02-21
Domain Age:
4 years 3 months 26 days
Domain Registrar:
Ascio Technologies Inc.
WhoIs:
 

% The WHOIS service offered by ROTLD and the access to the records in the ROTLD WHOIS database 
% are provided for information purposes and to be used within the scope of technical or administrative
% necessities of Internet operation or to remedy legal problems. The use for other purposes, 
% in particular for advertising and domain hunting, is not permitted.

% Without prejudice to the above, it is explicitly forbidden to extract, copy and/or use or re-utilise
% in any form and by any means (electronically or not) the whole or a quantitatively or qualitatively 
% substantial part of the contents of the WHOIS database without prior and explicit permission by ROTLD, 
% nor in any attempt hereof, to apply automated, electronic processes to ROTLD (or its systems).

% ROTLD cannot, under any circumstances, be held liable in case the stored information would prove 
% to be wrong, incomplete or not accurate in any sense.

% You agree that any reproduction and/or transmission of data for commercial purposes will always 
% be considered as the extraction of a substantial part of the content of the WHOIS database.

% By submitting the query you agree to abide by this policy and accept that ROTLD can take measures 
% to limit the use of its WHOIS services in order to protect the privacy of its registrants or the 
% integrity of the database.

% The ROTLD WHOIS service on port 43 never discloses any information concerning the registrant.

% Registrant information can be obtained through use of the web-based whois service available from 
% the ROTLD website www.rotld.ro


  Domain Name: fixpart.ro
  Registered On: 2021-02-22
  Expires On: 2026-02-21
  Registrar: Ascio Technologies Inc.
  Referral URL: www.ascio.com

  DNSSEC: Inactive

  Nameserver: ns01.hostnet.nl
  Nameserver: ns02.hostnet.nl

  Domain Status: OK