fic.com.py Fic.com.py

   
Financiera – FIC

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Fic.com.py?

• Fic.com.py ranks #2,183,264 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Fic.com.py?

• 7.6E-6% of global Internet users visit Fic.com.py

How many people visit Fic.com.py each day?

• Fic.com.py receives approximately 376 visitors and 649 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Fic.com.py receive most of its visitors from?

• Fic.com.py is mostly visited by people located in Paraguay,Argentina.

How much Fic.com.py can earn?

• Fic.com.py should earn about $0.35/day from advertising revenue.

What is Fic.com.py estimated value?

• Estimated value of Fic.com.py is $311.85.

What IP addresses does Fic.com.py resolve to?

• Fic.com.py resolves to the IP addresses 143.110.228.5.

Where are Fic.com.py servers located in?

• Fic.com.py has servers located in Santa Clara, California, 95054, United States.

fic.com.py Profile

Title:Financiera – FIC
Description:Más para vos!
Tags:
más para vos!
Edit Site Info

What technologies does fic.com.py use?

These are the technologies used at fic.com.py. fic.com.py has a total of 8 technologies installed in 10 different categories.
Page builders
Bricks Bricks
WordPress themes
Bricks Bricks
Security
HSTS HSTS
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
Performance
Priority Hints Priority Hints
Live Chat
WhatsApp Business Chat WhatsApp Business Chat
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Databases
MySQL MySQL

fic.com.py Traffic Analysis

Fic.com.py is ranked #2,183,264 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 376 visitors daily, generating a total of 649 pageviews. This equates to about 11.4K monthly visitors. Fic.com.py traffic has increased by 65.69% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors376
97.61%
Monthly Visits11.4K
65.69%
Pages per Visit1.73
5.99%
Visit duration00:43
30.54%
Bounce Rate55.27%
0.44%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
376
Monthly Visits:
11,393
Pages per Visit:
1.73
Daily Pageviews:
649
Avg. visit duration:
00:43
Bounce rate:
55.27%
Global Reach:
7.6E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
4,772
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
3,059
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
11,159
HypeRank:
2,183,264
SEMrush Rank:
14,362,411
SimilarWeb Rank:
2,183,264
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
43.61%
Referral:
7.65%
Search:
45.64%
Social:
3.10%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
72.63%
Mobile:
27.37%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

5.9K
JAN
6.9K
FEB
11.4K
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Paraguay 91.18%
 
Argentina 8.82%
Last update was 5 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 19 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with fic.com.py in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  fic.com.py
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  14,362,411
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  19
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $10.5 and annual gross revenue of approximately $127.8. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $311.9.

How much would fic.com.py make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.35
Monthly Revenue:
$10.50
Yearly Revenue:
$127.75
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Paraguay 592$0.33
 
Argentina 57$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.01
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$0.26
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$3.15
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
20
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
595
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
7,244

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Paraguay 12$0.01
 
Argentina 8$0.00

How much is fic.com.py worth?

Website Value:
$311.9

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
fic.com.py
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
fic.com.py
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
fic.com.py
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is fic.com.py hosted? ▼

Fic.com.py may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
143.110.228.5
ASN:
AS14061 
ISP:
DigitalOcean, LLC 
Server Location:
Santa Clara
California, CA
95054
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 143.110.228.5

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does fic.com.py load? ▼

The average loading time of fic.com.py is 826 ms. The Desktop speed index is 85 and mobile speed index is 70.
Average Load Time:
826 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

85
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 90% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.2s 11% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 49% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 49% 39% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 39%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.3s 23% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 23% 41% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 41% 34% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 34%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)49ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.1s 32% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 32% 37% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 37% 30% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 30%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)3ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 92% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.9s 17% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 17% 52% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 52% 30% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 30%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.9s 45% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 45% 32% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 32% 22% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)40ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.8s 45% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 45% 32% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 32% 21% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint 1.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Speed Index 2.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 1.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 0.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

70
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.6s 11% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 34% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 34% 56% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 56%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.4s 23% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 32% 30% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 30% 36% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 36%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)112ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 90% 8% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 8% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.9s 32% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 45% 31% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 31% 23% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 23%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.1s 20% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20% 44% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 44% 35% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 35%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.8s 50% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 50% 27% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 27% 22% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)121ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 87% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.6s 56% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 56% 23% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 23% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 20%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint 5.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 5.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 7.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Contentful Paint 1.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Does fic.com.py use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on fic.com.py are reduced by 79%.
fic.com.py use gzip compression.
Original size: 112.24 KB
Compressed size: 23.41 KB
File reduced by: 88.83 KB (79%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. fic.com.py supports HTTPS.
 fic.com.py supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.fic.com.py
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Thawte TLS RSA CA G1
Valid from: Aug 2 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Aug 1 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 fic.com.py does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 13:48:02 GMT
Server:  
X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains
Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=()
Link: <https://fic.com.py/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
Link: <https://fic.com.py/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/89>; rel="alternate"; title="JSON"; type="application/json"
Link: <https://fic.com.py/>; rel=shortlink
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Encoding: gzip
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
Referrer-Policy: strict-origin
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://*.googleapis.com https://*.gstatic.com *.google.com https://*.ggpht.com *.googleusercontent.com blob:;
Content-Security-Policy: img-src 'self' https://*.googleapis.com https://*.gstatic.com *.google.com *.gravatar.com *.googleusercontent.com data:;
Content-Security-Policy: frame-src 'self' *.google.com;
Content-Security-Policy: connect-src 'self' https://*.googleapis.com *.google.com https://*.gstatic.com  data: blob:;
Content-Security-Policy: font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com;
Content-Security-Policy: style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; worker-src blob:;
Content-Length: 23976
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all 300
MX fic-com-py.mail.protection.outlook.com 0
SOA 900
Mname ns-939.awsdns-53.net
Rname awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
A 143.110.228.5 0
NS ns-1067.awsdns-05.org 17912
NS ns-122.awsdns-15.com 17912
NS ns-939.awsdns-53.net 17912
NS ns-1573.awsdns-04.co.uk 17912