delicio.ro Delicio.ro

   
Pizza Delicio - Pizza&More - Delicio.ro

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Delicio.ro?

• Delicio.ro ranks #1,058,243 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Delicio.ro?

• 1.33E-5% of global Internet users visit Delicio.ro

How many people visit Delicio.ro each day?

• Delicio.ro receives approximately 658 visitors and 2,770 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Delicio.ro receive most of its visitors from?

• Delicio.ro is mostly visited by people located in Romania.

How much Delicio.ro can earn?

• Delicio.ro should earn about $0.75/day from advertising revenue.

What is Delicio.ro estimated value?

• Estimated value of Delicio.ro is $733.73.

What IP addresses does Delicio.ro resolve to?

• Delicio.ro resolves to the IP addresses 89.42.218.130.

Where are Delicio.ro servers located in?

• Delicio.ro has servers located in Romania.

delicio.ro Profile

Title:Pizza Delicio - Pizza&More - Delicio.ro Description:Comanda Pizza Delicio. Livrare pizza la domiciliu. Oferte pizza: DUO pack - TRIO pack | PIZZA-PARTY | paste | panzerotti | salate
Category:Arts and Entertainment / Streaming & Online TV
Edit Site Info

What technologies does delicio.ro use?

These are the technologies used at delicio.ro. delicio.ro has a total of 15 technologies installed in 14 different categories.
Page builders
Elementor Elementor
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
MonsterInsights MonsterInsights
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Open Graph Open Graph
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
jQuery Migrate jQuery Migrate
Web Servers
LiteSpeed LiteSpeed
Caching
Litespeed Cache Litespeed Cache
WordPress plugins
Litespeed Cache Litespeed Cache
MonsterInsights MonsterInsights
Yoast SEO Yoast SEO
WordPress themes
Twenty Twenty-One Twenty Twenty-One
Font Scripts
Typekit Typekit
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
SEO
Yoast SEO Yoast SEO
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Databases
MySQL MySQL

delicio.ro Traffic Analysis

Delicio.ro is ranked #1,058,243 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 658 visitors daily, generating a total of 2.8K pageviews. This equates to about 19.9K monthly visitors. Delicio.ro traffic has increased by 61.03% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors658
46.98%
Monthly Visits19.9K
61.03%
Pages per Visit4.21
28.35%
Visit duration05:28
100.81%
Bounce Rate37.99%
15.05%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
658
Monthly Visits:
19,937
Pages per Visit:
4.21
Daily Pageviews:
2,770
Avg. visit duration:
05:28
Bounce rate:
37.99%
Global Reach:
1.33E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
42,194
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
21,536
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
19,341
HypeRank:
1,058,243
SEMrush Rank:
8,805,540
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,058,243
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
34.78%
Referral:
1.47%
Search:
63.56%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0.18%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
13.27%
Mobile:
86.73%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

30.1K
DEC
12.4K
JAN
19.9K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Romania 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to delicio.ro?

Websites similar to delicio.ro are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 93 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with delicio.ro in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
567

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  delicio.ro
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  8,805,540
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  90
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  5
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.8 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $22.5 and annual gross revenue of approximately $273.8. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $733.7.

How much would delicio.ro make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.75
Monthly Revenue:
$22.50
Yearly Revenue:
$273.75
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Romania 2,770$0.75

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.16
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$4.71
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$57.33
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
582
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
17,451
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
212,321

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Romania 582$0.16

How much is delicio.ro worth?

Website Value:
$733.7

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
delicio.ro
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
delicio.ro
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
delicio.ro
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is delicio.ro hosted? ▼

Delicio.ro may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
89.42.218.130
ASN:
AS205275 
ISP:
ROMARG SRL 
Server Location:

Romania, RO
 

Other sites hosted on 89.42.218.130

How fast does delicio.ro load? ▼

The average loading time of delicio.ro is 843 ms. The Desktop speed index is 91 and mobile speed index is 70.
Average Load Time:
843 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

91
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)700ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 79% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)8ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)7ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 84% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 14% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 63% 28% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)34ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Time to Interactive 1.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 20 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 2.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

70
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)971ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 63% 31% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 31% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 86% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)71ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 90% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 8% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)808ms 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 74% 20% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 86% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)119ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 5.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Time to Interactive 5.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 5.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Total Blocking Time 20 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 2.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading

Does delicio.ro use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on delicio.ro are reduced by 75%.
delicio.ro use br compression.
Original size: 43.94 KB
Compressed size: 10.72 KB
File reduced by: 33.21 KB (75%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. delicio.ro supports HTTPS.
 delicio.ro supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: delicio.ro
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Feb 20 15:50:10 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 21 15:50:09 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 delicio.ro supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
link: <https://delicio.ro/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
link: <https://delicio.ro/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/19>; rel="alternate"; title="JSON"; type="application/json"
link: <https://delicio.ro/>; rel=shortlink
x-litespeed-cache-control: public,max-age=604800
x-litespeed-tag: 9f8_HTTP.200,9f8_PGSRP,9f8_front,9f8_URL.6666cd76f96956469e7be39d750cc7d9,9f8_F,9f8_Po.19,9f8_PGS,9f8_
etag: "2594-1741905361;br"
x-litespeed-cache: miss
content-encoding: br
vary: Accept-Encoding
date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 22:36:01 GMT
server: LiteSpeed
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
x-content-type-options: nosniff
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q050=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q046=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q043=":443"; ma=2592000, quic=":443"; ma=2592000; v="43,46"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 30
Mname ns1.romarg.com
Rname hostmaster.romarg.com
Serial Number 2025022001
Refresh 3600
Retry 1800
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
MX delicio-ro.mail.protection.outlook.com 30
TXT google-site-verification=j6pnq2Z6CSFNIIVd8iA3Rxqf_sdOjtYStbHCHIaSJkA 30
TXT v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all 30
A 89.42.218.130 17
NS ns4.romarg.com 30
NS ns3.romarg.com 30
NS ns1.romarg.com 30
NS ns2.romarg.com 30

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on February 10, 2020 and will expire on January 27, 2027 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar EXTREME SOLUTIONS SRL. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on June 15, 2025.
Domain Created:
2020-02-10
Domain Expires:
2027-01-27
Domain Age:
5 years 4 months 5 days
Domain Registrar:
EXTREME SOLUTIONS SRL
WhoIs:
 

% The WHOIS service offered by ROTLD and the access to the records in the ROTLD WHOIS database 
% are provided for information purposes and to be used within the scope of technical or administrative
% necessities of Internet operation or to remedy legal problems. The use for other purposes, 
% in particular for advertising and domain hunting, is not permitted.

% Without prejudice to the above, it is explicitly forbidden to extract, copy and/or use or re-utilise
% in any form and by any means (electronically or not) the whole or a quantitatively or qualitatively 
% substantial part of the contents of the WHOIS database without prior and explicit permission by ROTLD, 
% nor in any attempt hereof, to apply automated, electronic processes to ROTLD (or its systems).

% ROTLD cannot, under any circumstances, be held liable in case the stored information would prove 
% to be wrong, incomplete or not accurate in any sense.

% You agree that any reproduction and/or transmission of data for commercial purposes will always 
% be considered as the extraction of a substantial part of the content of the WHOIS database.

% By submitting the query you agree to abide by this policy and accept that ROTLD can take measures 
% to limit the use of its WHOIS services in order to protect the privacy of its registrants or the 
% integrity of the database.

% The ROTLD WHOIS service on port 43 never discloses any information concerning the registrant.

% Registrant information can be obtained through use of the web-based whois service available from 
% the ROTLD website www.rotld.ro


  Domain Name: delicio.ro
  Registered On: 2020-02-10
  Expires On: 2027-01-27
  Registrar: EXTREME SOLUTIONS SRL
  Referral URL: www.eureg.ro

  DNSSEC: Inactive

  Nameserver: ns1.romarg.com
  Nameserver: ns2.romarg.com
  Nameserver: ns3.romarg.com
  Nameserver: ns4.romarg.com

  Domain Status: OK