codex-vpn.ru Codex-vpn.ru

   
Codex VPN — Быстрый и надежный VPN 🚀

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Codex-vpn.ru?

• Codex-vpn.ru ranks #1,525,700 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Codex-vpn.ru?

• 1.24E-5% of global Internet users visit Codex-vpn.ru

How many people visit Codex-vpn.ru each day?

• Codex-vpn.ru receives approximately 609 visitors and 1,074 page impressions per day.

How much Codex-vpn.ru can earn?

• Codex-vpn.ru should earn about $4.38/day from advertising revenue.

What is Codex-vpn.ru estimated value?

• Estimated value of Codex-vpn.ru is $3,982.85.

What IP addresses does Codex-vpn.ru resolve to?

• Codex-vpn.ru resolves to the IP addresses 176.124.215.219.

Where are Codex-vpn.ru servers located in?

• Codex-vpn.ru has servers located in The Netherlands.

codex-vpn.ru Profile

Title:Codex VPN — Быстрый и надежный VPN 🚀 Description:Доступ к YouTube, Instagram, Telegram, ChatGPT, Notion, LinkedIn и другим сайтам!
Edit Site Info

What technologies does codex-vpn.ru use?

These are the technologies used at codex-vpn.ru. codex-vpn.ru has a total of 8 technologies installed in 8 different categories.
Web Frameworks
Next.js Next.js
Web Servers
Next.js Next.js
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
Miscellaneous
PWA PWA
webpack webpack
Performance
Priority Hints Priority Hints
Operating Systems
Ubuntu Ubuntu
JavaScript Frameworks
React React
Programming Languages
Node.js Node.js

codex-vpn.ru Traffic Analysis

Codex-vpn.ru is ranked #1,525,700 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 609 visitors daily, generating a total of 1.1K pageviews. This equates to about 18.5K monthly visitors. Codex-vpn.ru traffic has decreased by 61.52% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors609
60.54%
Monthly Visits18.5K
61.52%
Pages per Visit1.76
Visit duration00:41
Bounce Rate62.92%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
609
Monthly Visits:
18,453
Pages per Visit:
1.76
Daily Pageviews:
1,074
Avg. visit duration:
00:41
Bounce rate:
62.92%
Global Reach:
1.24E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
720
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
719
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
18,085
HypeRank:
1,525,700
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,525,700
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
27.92%
Referral:
0%
Search:
72.08%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

0
NOV
48K
DEC
18.5K
JAN
Last update was 141 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with codex-vpn.ru in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
7

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  codex-vpn.ru
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $4.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $131.4 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.6K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $4K.

How much would codex-vpn.ru make?

Daily Revenue:
$4.38
Monthly Revenue:
$131.40
Yearly Revenue:
$1,598.70
*All earnings values are estimates only.

How much is codex-vpn.ru worth?

Website Value:
$4K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
codex-vpn.ru
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
codex-vpn.ru
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
codex-vpn.ru
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is codex-vpn.ru hosted? ▼

Codex-vpn.ru may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
176.124.215.219
ASN:
AS216071 
ISP:
Servers Tech Fzco 
Server Location:

The Netherlands, NL
 

Other sites hosted on 176.124.215.219

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does codex-vpn.ru load? ▼

The average loading time of codex-vpn.ru is 447 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 99.
Average Load Time:
447 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)303ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)763ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)795ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)303ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)763ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)795ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 0.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 20 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 1.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)476ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 87% 11% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 85% 11% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)461ms 86% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 87% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 1.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 3.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 30 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 1.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Max Potential First Input Delay 80 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 3.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Does codex-vpn.ru use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on codex-vpn.ru are reduced by 74%.
codex-vpn.ru use gzip compression.
Original size: 13.89 KB
Compressed size: 3.51 KB
File reduced by: 10.38 KB (74%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  UNKNOWN

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. codex-vpn.ru supports HTTPS.
 codex-vpn.ru supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: codex-vpn.ru
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: E6
Valid from: Jan 20 07:46:40 2025 GMT
Valid until: Apr 20 07:46:39 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: E6
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 codex-vpn.ru does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
Server: nginx/1.24.0 (Ubuntu)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 05:26:03 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Connection: keep-alive
Vary: RSC, Next-Router-State-Tree, Next-Router-Prefetch, Next-Router-Segment-Prefetch, Accept-Encoding
x-nextjs-cache: HIT
x-nextjs-prerender: 1
x-nextjs-stale-time: 4294967294
X-Powered-By: Next.js
Cache-Control: s-maxage=31536000,
ETag: "orxhpdrdmrabr"
Content-Encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 176.124.215.219 43152
NS dean.ns.cloudflare.com 345552
NS addyson.ns.cloudflare.com 345552
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on September 12, 2024 and will expire on September 12, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar REGRU-RU. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on July 2, 2025.
Domain Created:
2024-09-12
Domain Expires:
2025-09-12
Domain Age:
9 months 20 days
Domain Registrar:
REGRU-RU
WhoIs:
 

% TCI Whois Service. Terms of use:
% https://tcinet.ru/documents/whois_ru_rf.pdf (in Russian)
% https://tcinet.ru/documents/whois_su.pdf (in Russian)

domain:        CODEX-VPN.RU
nserver:       addyson.ns.cloudflare.com.
nserver:       dean.ns.cloudflare.com.
state:         REGISTERED, DELEGATED, UNVERIFIED
person:        Private Person
registrar:     REGRU-RU
admin-contact: http://www.reg.ru/whois/admin_contact
created:       2024-09-12T18:18:28Z
paid-till:     2025-09-12T18:18:28Z
free-date:     2025-10-13
source:        TCI

Last updated on 2025-02-11T05:23:01Z