cloudonaut.io Cloudonaut.io

   
Cloudonaut | Launchpad for Amazon Web Services

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Cloudonaut.io?

• Cloudonaut.io ranks #1,116,236 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Cloudonaut.io?

1.26E-5% of global Internet users visit Cloudonaut.io

How many people visit Cloudonaut.io each day?

• Cloudonaut.io receives approximately 623 visitors and 995 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Cloudonaut.io receive most of its visitors from?

• Cloudonaut.io is mostly visited by people located in United States,India,Norway.

How much Cloudonaut.io can earn?

• Cloudonaut.io should earn about $3.39/day from advertising revenue.

What is Cloudonaut.io estimated value?

• Estimated value of Cloudonaut.io is $3,383.59.

What IP addresses does Cloudonaut.io resolve to?

• Cloudonaut.io resolves to the IP addresses 18.244.179.74.

Where are Cloudonaut.io servers located in?

• Cloudonaut.io has servers located in Seattle, WA, 98144, United States.

cloudonaut.io Profile

Title:cloudonaut | Launchpad for Amazon Web Services Description:All you need to know to build a highly available, scalable and cost efficient cloud infrastructure based on Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Programming and Developer Software

What technologies does cloudonaut.io use?

These are the technologies used at cloudonaut.io. cloudonaut.io has a total of 9 technologies installed in 7 different categories.

cloudonaut.io Traffic Analysis

Cloudonaut.io is ranked #1,116,236 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 623 visitors daily, generating a total of 1K pageviews. This equates to about 18.9K monthly visitors. Cloudonaut.io traffic has decreased by 52.63% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors623
70.59%
Monthly Visits18.9K
52.63%
Pages per Visit1.60
5.11%
Visit duration00:31
81.76%
Bounce Rate47.78%
17.12%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
623
Monthly Visits:
18,877
Pages per Visit:
1.60
Daily Pageviews:
995
Avg. visit duration:
00:31
Bounce rate:
47.78%
Global Reach:
1.26E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
2,310
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
1,311
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
18,310
HypeRank:
1,116,236
SEMrush Rank:
2,209,528
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,472,390
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
10.30%
Referral:
6.32%
Search:
77.19%
Social:
6.19%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

20.3K
DEC
39.8K
JAN
18.9K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 27.23%
 
India 10.42%
 
Norway 9.70%
 
Viet Nam 7.87%
 
Canada 6.29%

Where do visitors go on cloudonaut.io?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
cloudonaut.io
100.00%100.00%2.1

Which sites are competitors to cloudonaut.io?

Websites similar to cloudonaut.io are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 83 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with cloudonaut.io in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
2,030

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  cloudonaut.io
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  2,209,528
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  1,477
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  283
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $171.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $3.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $101.7 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.2K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $3.4K.

How much would cloudonaut.io make?

Daily Revenue:
$3.39
Monthly Revenue:
$101.70
Yearly Revenue:
$1,237.35
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 271$1.31
 
Canada 63$0.38
 
Norway 96$0.07
 
India 104$0.04
 
Viet Nam 78$0.04

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.36
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$10.68
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$129.98
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
116
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
3,476
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
42,293

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 49$0.24
 
Canada 16$0.09
 
Norway 19$0.01
 
India 29$0.01
 
Viet Nam 3$0.00

How much is cloudonaut.io worth?

Website Value:
$3.4K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
cloudonaut.io
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
cloudonaut.io
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
cloudonaut.io
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is cloudonaut.io hosted?

Cloudonaut.io may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
18.244.179.74
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:
Seattle
WA
98144
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 18.244.179.74

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does cloudonaut.io load?

The average loading time of cloudonaut.io is 290 ms. The Desktop speed index is 84 and mobile speed index is 86.
Average Load Time:
290 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

84
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)4ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 90% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 67% 23% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 23% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)31ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 9% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)4ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 90% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 67% 23% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 23% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)31ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 9% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 0.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 0.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint 0.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 0.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

86
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 67% 21% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 21% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 84% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 67% 21% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 21% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 84% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 2.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Time to Interactive 3.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint 3.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Speed Index 4.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric

Does cloudonaut.io use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on cloudonaut.io are reduced by 79%.
cloudonaut.io use gzip compression.
Original size: 49.85 KB
Compressed size: 10.2 KB
File reduced by: 39.65 KB (79%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. cloudonaut.io has 95 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  95
Safety Confidence:
  12

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. cloudonaut.io supports HTTPS.
 cloudonaut.io supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: cloudonaut.io
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Amazon RSA 2048 M02
Valid from: Feb 27 00:00:00 2025 GMT
Valid until: Mar 28 23:59:59 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon RSA 2048 M02
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Amazon Root CA 1
Valid from: Aug 23 22:25:30 2022 GMT
Valid until: Aug 23 22:25:30 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon Root CA 1
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: May 25 12:00:00 2015 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 01:00:00 2037 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 cloudonaut.io supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
content-type: text/html
x-amz-id-2: ns/OEzVF0OJZG7jIeu1d5rvFMCeqQ39TrF0DrFFEiShM8aJCfzmnEZPSNGO43DWK6odLHT0f6LE=
x-amz-request-id: PRCXQEEJAA8AXJ3B
date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:23:22 GMT
last-modified: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 02:33:23 GMT
x-amz-server-side-encryption: AES256
cache-control: max-age=86400
server: AmazonS3
content-encoding: gzip
etag: W/"73fa8938a13d48a030dfbfd832d0e724"
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-cache: Hit from cloudfront
via: 1.1 2ebdcfa405b1be36ccc36f8b3dc3deae.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
x-amz-cf-pop: LHR61-P7
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
x-amz-cf-id: ROAVHmVu43AphwM0Uga1wLClbdvrlFOUXyioBvh7-aKqsNRMOA4Y7g==
age: 29240

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT google-site-verification=WPzL6Yiee6tJKbSpBGpE7TsCwB7Nv3h8cT-xFgepZAU 300
TXT v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net ?all 300
MX aspmx3.googlemail.com 300
MX alt1.aspmx.l.google.com 300
MX aspmx2.googlemail.com 300
MX alt2.aspmx.l.google.com 300
MX aspmx.l.google.com 300
SOA 900
Mname ns-140.awsdns-17.com
Rname awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
A 18.244.179.74 60
A 18.244.179.23 60
A 18.244.179.36 60
A 18.244.179.70 60
NS ns-1156.awsdns-16.org 3296
NS ns-140.awsdns-17.com 3296
NS ns-524.awsdns-01.net 3296
NS ns-1741.awsdns-25.co.uk 3296

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on May 8, 2015 and will expire on May 8, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Gandi SAS. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on April 9, 2024.
Domain Created:
2015-05-08
Domain Expires:
2025-05-08
Domain Updated:
2024-04-09
Domain Age:
10 years 1 months 8 days
Domain Registrar:
Gandi SAS
Domain Owner:
REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: cloudonaut.io
Registry Domain ID: 04653224f8e144ffb855f4077a14320a-DONUTS
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.gandi.net
Registrar URL: https://www.gandi.net
Updated Date: 2024-04-09T01:32:47Z
Creation Date: 2015-05-08T20:10:48Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-05-08T20:10:48Z
Registrar: Gandi SAS
Registrar IANA ID: 81
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +33.170377661
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Organization: 
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant State/Province: Paris
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Country: FR
Registrant Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Name Server: ns-140.awsdns-17.com
Name Server: ns-524.awsdns-01.net
Name Server: ns-1741.awsdns-25.co.uk
Name Server: ns-1156.awsdns-16.org
DNSSEC: signedDelegation
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-24T23:31:45Z