classicwrestlingreview.com Classicwrestlingreview.com

   
Classic Wrestling Review

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Classicwrestlingreview.com?

• Classicwrestlingreview.com ranks #1,254,206 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Classicwrestlingreview.com?

• 1.46E-5% of global Internet users visit Classicwrestlingreview.com

How many people visit Classicwrestlingreview.com each day?

• Classicwrestlingreview.com receives approximately 720 visitors and 1,158 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Classicwrestlingreview.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Classicwrestlingreview.com is mostly visited by people located in United States,United Kingdom,Canada.

How much Classicwrestlingreview.com can earn?

• Classicwrestlingreview.com should earn about $4.86/day from advertising revenue.

What is Classicwrestlingreview.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Classicwrestlingreview.com is $4,701.51.

What IP addresses does Classicwrestlingreview.com resolve to?

• Classicwrestlingreview.com resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3034::ac43:c9cb, 104.21.60.215.

classicwrestlingreview.com Profile

Title:Classic Wrestling Review
Description:A wrestling blog chronologically reviewing all pre-network PPVs from the WWF/WWE, WCW, & ECW. I am covering from Starrcade '83 to WrestleMania 30.
Category:Sports / Other Sports
Edit Site Info

What technologies does classicwrestlingreview.com use?

These are the technologies used at classicwrestlingreview.com. classicwrestlingreview.com has a total of 13 technologies installed in 12 different categories.
Hosting
Bluehost Bluehost
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
WordPress plugins
Endurance Page Cache Endurance Page Cache
Jetpack Boost Jetpack Boost
Caching
Endurance Page Cache Endurance Page Cache
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Open Graph Open Graph
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
jQuery Migrate jQuery Migrate
Performance
Priority Hints Priority Hints
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Databases
MySQL MySQL

classicwrestlingreview.com Traffic Analysis

Classicwrestlingreview.com is ranked #1,254,206 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 720 visitors daily, generating a total of 1.2K pageviews. This equates to about 21.8K monthly visitors. Classicwrestlingreview.com traffic has decreased by 59.54% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors720
78.78%
Monthly Visits21.8K
59.54%
Pages per Visit1.61
53.47%
Visit duration00:54
83%
Bounce Rate48.01%
20.1%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
720
Monthly Visits:
21,816
Pages per Visit:
1.61
Daily Pageviews:
1,158
Avg. visit duration:
00:54
Bounce rate:
48.01%
Global Reach:
1.46E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
19,933
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
5,607
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
21,394
HypeRank:
1,254,206
SEMrush Rank:
972,930
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,254,206
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
61.33%
Referral:
0.21%
Search:
38.46%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
13.71%
Mobile:
86.29%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

22.2K
FEB
53.9K
MAR
21.8K
APR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 47.28%
 
United Kingdom 24.99%
 
Canada 19.71%
 
Chile 8.02%

Which sites are competitors to classicwrestlingreview.com?

Websites similar to classicwrestlingreview.com are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 4 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 20 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with classicwrestlingreview.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  classicwrestlingreview.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  972,930
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  2,526
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  1,133
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $18.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $4.9 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $145.8 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.8K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $4.7K.

How much would classicwrestlingreview.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$4.86
Monthly Revenue:
$145.80
Yearly Revenue:
$1,773.90
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 547$2.64
 
Canada 228$1.38
 
United Kingdom 289$0.78
 
Chile 93$0.07

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.95
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$28.60
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$347.95
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
214
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
6,420
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
78,104

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 99$0.48
 
Canada 57$0.34
 
United Kingdom 46$0.12
 
Chile 12$0.01

How much is classicwrestlingreview.com worth?

Website Value:
$4.7K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
classicwrestlingreview.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
classicwrestlingreview.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
classicwrestlingreview.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is classicwrestlingreview.com hosted? ▼

Classicwrestlingreview.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.

How fast does classicwrestlingreview.com load? ▼

The average loading time of classicwrestlingreview.com is 976 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 87.
Average Load Time:
976 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)3ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 66% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 66% 28% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 80% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)95ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 81% 13% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)3ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 66% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 66% 28% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 28% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 80% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)95ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 81% 13% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 13% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 0.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Time to Interactive 0.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Speed Index 1.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

87
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)8ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 79% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 14% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 66% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 64% 29% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 29% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 79% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)99ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 84% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)8ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 79% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 14% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 64% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 64% 29% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 29% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 79% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)99ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 84% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Lab Data

Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint 3.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 1.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Speed Index 2.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Time to Interactive 3.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric

Does classicwrestlingreview.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on classicwrestlingreview.com are reduced by 80%.
classicwrestlingreview.com use br compression.
Original size: 162.74 KB
Compressed size: 31.65 KB
File reduced by: 131.09 KB (80%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SUSPICIOUS

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. classicwrestlingreview.com supports HTTPS.
 classicwrestlingreview.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: classicwrestlingreview.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Mar 14 04:44:07 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 12 05:42:28 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 classicwrestlingreview.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Sat, 10 May 2025 13:18:22 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
x-dns-prefetch-control: on
cf-edge-cache: cache,platform=wordpress
vary: accept,content-type,Accept-Encoding
link: <https://classicwrestlingreview.com/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/", <https://classicwrestlingreview.com/?author=0>; title="ActivityPub (JSON)"; rel="alternate"; type="application/activity+json", </wp-content/themes/boldwp/style.css>; rel=preload; as=style, </wp-content/themes/boldwp/assets/css/all.min.css>; rel=preload; as=style, </wp-content/uploads/fonts/1a51cd19d1bcfb0f569d206dfb62dc26/font.css?v=1703681584>; rel=preload; as=style, </wp-content/themes/boldwp/assets/js/respond.min.js>; rel=preload; as=script, </wp-content/plugins/thirstyaffiliates/js/app/ta.js?ver=3.11.4>; rel=preload; as=script, </wp-content/themes/boldwp/assets/js/ResizeSensor.min.js>; rel=preload; as=script, </wp-content/themes/boldwp/assets/js/theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js>; rel=preload; as=script, </wp-content/themes/boldwp/assets/js/jquery.fitvids.min.js>; rel=preload; as=script, </wp-content/themes/boldwp/assets/js/navigation.js>; rel=preload; as=script, </wp-content/themes/boldwp/assets/js/skip-link-focus-fix.js>; rel=preload; as=script, </wp-content/themes/boldwp/assets/js/custom.js>; rel=preload; as=script, </wp-content/themes/boldwp/assets/js/html5shiv.js>; rel=preload; as=script
x-litespeed-tag: 6ca_home,6ca_URL.6666cd76f96956469e7be39d750cc7d9,6ca_F,6ca_guest,6ca_,6ca_UCSS.8aca0597d23b96652b7245e5c3a2c1bf,6ca_MIN.f1ab2c41510a19d26ae9c5b56924bc74.css,6ca_MIN.83337b66a118c3f3ef7fb38b629576a8.js
cache-control: max-age=7200
expires: Sat, 10 May 2025 15:18:21 GMT
report-to: {"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800,"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=N3QiqfjM0VvbECOA86BPRyAQqjJMjFWrK9vIPgz8HLSPu8RmPGdF%2F1vTLHEje4V0%2F5xfUBHv58eCXnAJB7xITFqfG28ert0mpsPKmmS8av0vfYQ7RXOjwZ7H33sTB60khuaPs110lmgRxHKS6g%3D%3D"}]}
host-header: c2hhcmVkLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
x-endurance-cache-level: 2
x-nginx-cache: WordPress
server: cloudflare
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
nel: {"report_to":"cf-nel","success_fraction":0.0,"max_age":604800}
content-encoding: br
cf-ray: 93d9b8d8ce8f5da7-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3033::6815:3cd7 211
AAAA 2606:4700:3034::ac43:c9cb 211
A 172.67.201.203 211
A 104.21.60.215 211
NS seamus.ns.cloudflare.com 172711
NS melissa.ns.cloudflare.com 172711
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on March 7, 2020 and will expire on March 7, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar FastDomain Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on February 19, 2025.
Domain Created:
2020-03-07
Domain Expires:
2026-03-07
Domain Updated:
2025-02-19
Domain Age:
5 years 2 months 3 days
Domain Registrar:
FastDomain Inc.
Domain Owner:
PERFECT PRIVACY, LLC
WhoIs:
 

   Domain Name: CLASSICWRESTLINGREVIEW.COM
   Registry Domain ID: 2500749592_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
   Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.fastdomain.com
   Registrar URL: http://www.fastdomain.com
   Updated Date: 2025-02-19T09:42:18Z
   Creation Date: 2020-03-07T00:19:09Z
   Registry Expiry Date: 2026-03-07T00:19:09Z
   Registrar: FastDomain Inc.
   Registrar IANA ID: 1154
   Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
   Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8777228662
   Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
   Name Server: MELISSA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
   Name Server: SEAMUS.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
   DNSSEC: unsigned
   URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2025-05-10T13:19:34Z