Citer.toolforge.org
Citer
Domain Summary
What percent of global Internet users visit Citer.toolforge.org?
• 6.4E-6% of global Internet users visit Citer.toolforge.org
How many people visit Citer.toolforge.org each day?
• Citer.toolforge.org receives approximately 314 visitors and 747 page impressions per day.
Which countries does Citer.toolforge.org receive most of its visitors from?
• Citer.toolforge.org is mostly visited by people located in Netherlands,United Kingdom,United States.
How much Citer.toolforge.org can earn?
• Citer.toolforge.org should earn about $1.67/day from advertising revenue.
What is Citer.toolforge.org estimated value?
• Estimated value of Citer.toolforge.org is $1,656.08.
What IP addresses does Citer.toolforge.org resolve to?
• Citer.toolforge.org resolves to the IP addresses 2a02:ec80:a000:1::1db, 185.15.56.11.
Where are Citer.toolforge.org servers located in?
• Citer.toolforge.org has servers located in United States.
citer.toolforge.org Profile

What technologies does citer.toolforge.org use?
These are the technologies used at citer.toolforge.org. citer.toolforge.org has a total of 2 technologies installed in 3 different categories.citer.toolforge.org Traffic Analysis
This website is viewed by an estimated 314 visitors daily, generating a total of 747 pageviews. This equates to about 9.5K monthly visitors. Citer.toolforge.org traffic has increased by 0.34% compared to last month.Daily Visitors314
3.33%
Monthly Visits9.5K
0.34%
Pages per Visit2.38
8.99%
Visit duration06:50
4%
Bounce Rate27.68%
0.22%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
- Daily Unique Visitors:
- 314
- Monthly Visits:
- 9,514
- Pages per Visit:
- 2.38
- Daily Pageviews:
- 747
- Avg. visit duration:
- 06:50
- Bounce rate:
- 27.68%
- Global Reach:
- 6.4E-6%
- Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
- 3,001,057
- Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
- 2,048,108
- Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
- 9,315
- HypeRank:
- n/a
- SEMrush Rank:
- 5,120,500
Traffic sources
- Direct:
- 15.08%
- Referral:
- 82.59%
- Search:
- 2.10%
- Social:
- 0.21%
- Paid:
- 0.02%
Desktop vs Mobile
- Desktop:
- 57.75%
- Mobile:
- 42.25%
Total Visits Last 3 Months
8K
APR
9.5K
MAY
9.5K
JUN
Visitors by country
- Country
- Users%
- Netherlands 70.85%
- United Kingdom 11.03%
- United States 10.50%
- Brazil 5.83%
- India 1.78%
Backlinks Report ▼
Citer.toolforge.org has a total of 3,540 backlinks from 178 referring domains and most of them comes from United States.- Total Backlinks:
- 3,540
- Follow Links:
- n/a
- Nofollow Links:
- n/a
- Referring Domains:
- 178
- Referring IPs:
- 225
- Authority Domain Score:
- 25
Backlinks by country
- Country
- Domains
- United States 65
- Germany 13
- France 7
- Finland 7
- Hong Kong 5
Backlinks by TLDs
- TLD Distribution
- Domains
- .com
- 48
- .org
- 44
- .dev
- 11
- .edu
- 0
- .gov
- 0
Which sites are competitors to citer.toolforge.org?
Websites similar to citer.toolforge.org are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.- Domain
- CompareDaily Visitors
- wikipedia.org
- Compare >125.7M
- quora.com
- Compare >16.1M
- deepl.com
- Compare >6.2M
- yelp.com
- Compare >4.5M
- perplexity.ai
- Compare >4.2M
- sciencedirect.com
- Compare >3.1M
- merriam-webster.com
- Compare >2M
- britannica.com
- Compare >1.3M
- thesaurus.com
- Compare >881.5K
- urbandictionary.com
- Compare >598.9K
- geoguessr.com
- Compare >449.9K
- dict.cc
- Compare >220.4K
- wikidata.org
- Compare >207.7K
- openstreetmap.org
- Compare >200.8K
- mapchart.net
- Compare >24.7K
- latitude.to
- Compare >13.8K
Last update was 2 hours ago
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...
Update will be available in 22 hours
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...
Update will be available in 22 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with citer.toolforge.org in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.
Search Engine Indexes ▼
Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.- Bing Index:
- 6,130,000
▼
SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.- Domain:
- citer.toolforge.org
- Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic) - 5,120,500
- Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP) - 13
- Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results) - 41
- Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords) - $53.00
Revenue report ▼
Google.com would generate approximately $1.7 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $50.1 and annual gross revenue of approximately $609.6. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1.7K.How much would citer.toolforge.org make?
- Daily Revenue:
- $1.67
- Monthly Revenue:
- $50.10
- Yearly Revenue:
- $609.55
Daily earning by country
- CountryPageviewsEarning
- Netherlands 529$1.01
- United States 78$0.38
- United Kingdom 82$0.22
- Brazil 44$0.06
- India 13$0.01
Loss of money due to Adblock?
- Daily Revenue Loss:
- $0.28
- Monthly Revenue Loss:
- $8.41
- Yearly Revenue Loss:
- $102.30
- Daily Pageviews Blocked:
- 124
- Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
- 3,709
- Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
- 45,121
Daily revenue loss by country
- CountryBlockedLost Money
- Netherlands 90$0.17
- United States 14$0.07
- United Kingdom 13$0.04
- Brazil 3$0.00
- India 4$0.00
How much is citer.toolforge.org worth?
- Website Value:
- $1.7K
Ad Experience Report ▼
Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.Mobile summary
- Root domain:
- citer.toolforge.org
- Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.) - Not reviewed
Desktop summary
- Root domain:
- citer.toolforge.org
- Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.) - Not reviewed
Abusive Experience Report ▼
Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.- Root domain:
- citer.toolforge.org
- Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.) - Not reviewed
Where is citer.toolforge.org hosted? ▼
Citer.toolforge.org may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.- Server IP:
- 2a02:ec80:a000:1::1db, 185.15.56.11
- ASN:
- AS14907
- ISP:
- Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
- Server Location:
United States, US
Other sites hosted on 185.15.56.11
How fast does citer.toolforge.org load? ▼
The average loading time of citer.toolforge.org is 285 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.- Average Load Time:
- 285 ms
Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop
Field Data
Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Origin Data
All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Lab Data
LCP request discovery
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Improve image delivery
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Time to Interactive 0.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
INP breakdown
Start investigating with the longest subpart. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Start investigating with the longest subpart. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Minimize third-party usage
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
First Meaningful Paint
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 0.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile
Field Data
Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Origin Data
All pages served from this origin have an speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0
First Contentful Paint (FCP)0
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)0
Lab Data
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Speed Index 1.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP breakdown
Start investigating with the longest subpart. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Start investigating with the longest subpart. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Minimize third-party usage
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Improve image delivery
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Meaningful Paint
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Does citer.toolforge.org use compression? ▼
Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on citer.toolforge.org are reduced by 60%.
citer.toolforge.org use gzip compression.
Original size: 3.64 KB
Compressed size: 1.46 KB
File reduced by: 2.18 KB (60%)
Compressed size: 1.46 KB
File reduced by: 2.18 KB (60%)
Google Safe Browsing ▼
Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼
An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. citer.toolforge.org supports HTTPS. citer.toolforge.org supports HTTPS
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: toolforge.org
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: E5
Valid from: Jun 13 12:04:46 2025 GMT
Valid until: Sep 11 12:04:45 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: E5
Valid from: Jun 13 12:04:46 2025 GMT
Valid until: Sep 11 12:04:45 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: E5
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼
HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency. citer.toolforge.org supports HTTP/2
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...
Http Header ▼
HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.server: nginx/1.22.1
date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 17:39:02 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
access-control-allow-origin: *
strict-transport-security: max-age=31622400
x-clacks-overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
permissions-policy: browsing-topics=()
content-security-policy-report-only: default-src 'self' 'unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline' blob: data: filesystem: mediastream: *.toolforge.org wikibooks.org *.wikibooks.org wikidata.org *.wikidata.org wikimedia.org *.wikimedia.org wikinews.org *.wikinews.org wikipedia.org *.wikipedia.org wikiquote.org *.wikiquote.org wikisource.org *.wikisource.org wikiversity.org *.wikiversity.org wikivoyage.org *.wikivoyage.org wiktionary.org *.wiktionary.org *.wmcloud.org *.wmflabs.org wikimediafoundation.org mediawiki.org *.mediawiki.org wss://citer.toolforge.org; report-uri https://csp-report.toolforge.org/collect;
content-encoding: gzip
DNS Lookup ▼
DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.Type | Ip | Target/Txt | TTL |
A | 185.15.56.11 | 3600 | |
AAAA | 2a02:ec80:a000:1::1db | 3600 |
Whois Lookup ▼
Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.- WhoIs:
Malformed request. >>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-07-09T17:39:38Z