borderalarm.com Borderalarm.com

   
BorderAlarm

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Borderalarm.com?

• Borderalarm.com ranks #3,342,025 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Borderalarm.com?

• 3.4E-6% of global Internet users visit Borderalarm.com

How many people visit Borderalarm.com each day?

• Borderalarm.com receives approximately 170 visitors and 386 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Borderalarm.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Borderalarm.com is mostly visited by people located in Germany,Serbia,Hungary.

How much Borderalarm.com can earn?

• Borderalarm.com should earn about $0.34/day from advertising revenue.

What is Borderalarm.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Borderalarm.com is $331.30.

What IP addresses does Borderalarm.com resolve to?

• Borderalarm.com resolves to the IP addresses 2a01:4f8:d0a:5143::2, 88.198.220.154.

Where are Borderalarm.com servers located in?

• Borderalarm.com has servers located in Germany.

borderalarm.com Profile

Title:BorderAlarm Description:Accurate user reported waiting times on borders accross EU
Edit Site Info

What technologies does borderalarm.com use?

These are the technologies used at borderalarm.com. borderalarm.com has a total of 13 technologies installed in 13 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server
Tag Managers
Google Tag Manager Google Tag Manager
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
jQuery Migrate jQuery Migrate
Select2 Select2
CDN
jsDelivr jsDelivr
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
Security
reCAPTCHA reCAPTCHA
Caching
WP Rocket WP Rocket
WordPress plugins
WP Rocket WP Rocket
WPML WPML
Translation
WPML WPML
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Databases
MySQL MySQL

borderalarm.com Traffic Analysis

Borderalarm.com is ranked #3,342,025 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 170 visitors daily, generating a total of 386 pageviews. This equates to about 5.2K monthly visitors. Borderalarm.com traffic has decreased by 95.04% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors170
83.54%
Monthly Visits5.2K
95.04%
Pages per Visit2.27
21.2%
Visit duration00:33
147.37%
Bounce Rate47.15%
435.9%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
170
Monthly Visits:
5,151
Pages per Visit:
2.27
Daily Pageviews:
386
Avg. visit duration:
00:33
Bounce rate:
47.15%
Global Reach:
3.4E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
2,843
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
2,808
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
5,045
HypeRank:
3,342,025
SEMrush Rank:
11,539,637
SimilarWeb Rank:
3,342,025
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
8.20%
Referral:
0%
Search:
91.80%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
19.77%
Mobile:
80.23%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

34.7K
DEC
103.9K
JAN
5.2K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Germany 46.11%
 
Serbia 24.13%
 
Hungary 14.65%
 
Croatia 13.21%
 
Sweden 1.90%
Last update was 120 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with borderalarm.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1,510

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  borderalarm.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  11,539,637
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  25
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  1
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.3 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $10.2 and annual gross revenue of approximately $124.1. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $331.3.

How much would borderalarm.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.34
Monthly Revenue:
$10.20
Yearly Revenue:
$124.10
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Germany 178$0.25
 
Croatia 51$0.05
 
Serbia 93$0.02
 
Hungary 57$0.01
 
Sweden 7$0.01

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.09
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$2.77
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$33.75
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
95
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
2,863
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
34,830

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Germany 52$0.07
 
Croatia 11$0.01
 
Hungary 15$0.00
 
Serbia 16$0.00
 
Sweden 2$0.00

How much is borderalarm.com worth?

Website Value:
$331.3

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
borderalarm.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
borderalarm.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
borderalarm.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is borderalarm.com hosted? ▼

Borderalarm.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2a01:4f8:d0a:5143::2, 88.198.220.154
ASN:
AS24940 
ISP:
Hetzner Online GmbH 
Server Location:

Germany, DE
 

Other sites hosted on 88.198.220.154

How fast does borderalarm.com load? ▼

The average loading time of borderalarm.com is 1174 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 98.
Average Load Time:
1174 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 17% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 17% 70% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 70% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)44ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 17% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 17% 70% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 70% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.5s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 87% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)44ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Speed Index 1.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 40 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Time to Interactive 0.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

98
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.7s 17% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 64% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 64% 21% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 21%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 72% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.2s 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 81% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.7s 12% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12% 67% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 67% 20% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 20%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 71% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 71% 21% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)88ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 87% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 2.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Speed Index 3.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 2.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
First Contentful Paint 1.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Does borderalarm.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on borderalarm.com are reduced by 84%.
borderalarm.com use gzip compression.
Original size: 159.17 KB
Compressed size: 24.75 KB
File reduced by: 134.42 KB (84%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  UNKNOWN

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. borderalarm.com supports HTTPS.
 borderalarm.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: borderalarm.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Encryption Everywhere DV TLS CA - G2
Valid from: Jul 9 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Jul 8 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Encryption Everywhere DV TLS CA - G2
Organization: DigiCert Inc, OU = www.digicert.com
Location: US
Issuer: DigiCert Global Root G2
Valid from: Nov 27 12:46:40 2017 GMT
Valid until: Nov 27 12:46:40 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 borderalarm.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
link: <https://borderalarm.com/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/", <https://borderalarm.com/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/99>; rel="alternate"; type="application/json", <https://borderalarm.com/>; rel=shortlink
vary: Accept-Encoding
cache-control: max-age=0
expires: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 02:31:42 GMT
content-encoding: gzip
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 02:31:42 GMT
server: Apache

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 7200
Mname ns1.your-server.de
Rname postmaster.your-server.de
Serial Number 2025021800
Refresh 86400
Retry 10800
Expire 3600000
Minimum TTL 3600
AAAA 2a01:4f8:d0a:5143::2 6893
A 88.198.220.154 6893
NS ns3.second-ns.de 172493
NS ns.second-ns.com 172493
NS ns1.your-server.de 172493

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on July 8, 2019 and will expire on July 8, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar GoDaddy.com, LLC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on July 9, 2024.
Domain Created:
2019-07-08
Domain Expires:
2025-07-08
Domain Updated:
2024-07-09
Domain Age:
6 years 26 days
Domain Registrar:
GoDaddy.com, LLC
WhoIs:
 

   Domain Name: BORDERALARM.COM
   Registry Domain ID: 2410508784_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
   Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
   Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
   Updated Date: 2024-07-09T11:36:33Z
   Creation Date: 2019-07-08T11:11:28Z
   Registry Expiry Date: 2025-07-08T11:11:28Z
   Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
   Registrar IANA ID: 146
   Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
   Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
   Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
   Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
   Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
   Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
   Name Server: NS.SECOND-NS.COM
   Name Server: NS1.YOUR-SERVER.DE
   Name Server: NS3.SECOND-NS.DE
   DNSSEC: unsigned
   URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2025-04-05T02:32:33Z